Source:Livingstone:Journal of Semitic Studies:42:1:se'um - Revision history

RogerNicholson: /* Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'" */

2014-09-26T02:20:29Z

Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'"

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:20, 26 September 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	<onlyinclude>		<onlyinclude>
	==Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'"==		==Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'"==
			Alasdair Livingstone:
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>
	If this [u'um] was the common word in Babylonian then it is more than likely that it also existed in Old Akkadian and could then have existed along with se, 'barley', as a loanword in Sumerian. ... In summary, the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'. It does, however, manifestly require the existence of a word u'um. <ref>Alasdair Livingstone, [http://jss.oxfordjournals.org/content/XLII/1/1.full.pdf+html?ssource=mfc&rss=1 "The Akkadian Word for Barley: A Note from the Schoolroom,"] ''Journal of Semitic Studies'', 42:1, (1997)</ref>		If this [u'um] was the common word in Babylonian then it is more than likely that it also existed in Old Akkadian and could then have existed along with se, 'barley', as a loanword in Sumerian. ... In summary, the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'. It does, however, manifestly require the existence of a word u'um. <ref>Alasdair Livingstone, [http://jss.oxfordjournals.org/content/XLII/1/1.full.pdf+html?ssource=mfc&rss=1 "The Akkadian Word for Barley: A Note from the Schoolroom,"] ''Journal of Semitic Studies'', 42:1, (1997)</ref>

RogerNicholson: /* Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'" */

2014-09-26T02:14:27Z

Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'"

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:14, 26 September 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:
	==Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'"==		==Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'"==
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>
	If this [u'um] was the common word in Babylonian then it is more than likely that it also existed in Old Akkadian and could then have existed along with se, 'barley', as a loanword in Sumerian. ... In summary, the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'. It does, however, manifestly require the existence of a word u'um. <ref>Alasdair Livingstone, [http://jss.oxfordjournals.org/content/XLII/1/1.full.pdf+html?ssource=mfc&rss=1 "The Akkadian Word for Barley: A Note from the Schoolroom"] (''Journal of Semitic Studies'', 42:1, Sp 1997)</ref>		If this [u'um] was the common word in Babylonian then it is more than likely that it also existed in Old Akkadian and could then have existed along with se, 'barley', as a loanword in Sumerian. ... In summary, the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'. It does, however, manifestly require the existence of a word u'um. <ref>Alasdair Livingstone, [http://jss.oxfordjournals.org/content/XLII/1/1.full.pdf+html?ssource=mfc&rss=1 "The Akkadian Word for Barley: A Note from the Schoolroom,"] ''Journal of Semitic Studies'', 42:1, (1997)</ref>
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>
	</onlyinclude>		</onlyinclude>
	{{endnotes sources}}		{{endnotes sources}}

RogerNicholson: Created page with "{{FME-Source |title=Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'" |category=Book of Mormon/Plants/Sheum }} ==Li..."

2014-09-26T02:13:42Z

Created page with "{{FME-Source |title=Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'" |category=Book of Mormon/Plants/Sheum }} <onlyinclude> ==Li..."

New page

{{FME-Source
|title=Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'"
|category=Book of Mormon/Plants/Sheum
}}
<onlyinclude>
==Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'"==
<blockquote>
If this [u'um] was the common word in Babylonian then it is more than likely that it also existed in Old Akkadian and could then have existed along with se, 'barley', as a loanword in Sumerian. ... In summary, the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'. It does, however, manifestly require the existence of a word u'um. <ref>Alasdair Livingstone, [http://jss.oxfordjournals.org/content/XLII/1/1.full.pdf+html?ssource=mfc&rss=1 "The Akkadian Word for Barley: A Note from the Schoolroom"] (''Journal of Semitic Studies'', 42:1, Sp 1997)</ref>
</blockquote>
</onlyinclude>
{{endnotes sources}}