Source:Nibley:CW06:Ch8:6:Lands of inheritance - Revision history

RogerNicholson: /* The importance of "lands of inheritance" in ancient Israel */ m

2014-09-05T19:55:55Z

The importance of "lands of inheritance" in ancient Israel: m

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:55, 5 September 2014
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Book of Mormon/Anthropology/Politics\|Politics]]		[[Category:Book of Mormon/Anthropology/Politics\|Politics]]
	[[Category:Jerusalem]]		[[Category:Jerusalem]]
			[[Category:Jershon]]

RogerNicholson: /* Lands of inheritance */ m

2014-09-03T03:45:18Z

Lands of inheritance: m

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:45, 3 September 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\|catname=		\|catname=
	}}<onlyinclude>		}}<onlyinclude>
	==~~Lands~~ of inheritance==		==The importance of "lands of inheritance" in ancient Israel==

	:Such was the old aristocracy of Israel. Eduard Meyer says that all their power and authority went back originally to the first land-allotments made among the leaders of the migratory host when they settled down in their land of promise. Regardless of wealth of influence or ability, no one could belong to the old aristocracy who did not still possess "the land of his inheritance."14 This institution—or attitude—plays a remarkably conspicuous role in the Book of Mormon. Not only does Lehi leave "the land of his inheritance" ({{s\|1\|Nephi\|2\|4}}) but whenever his people wish to establish a new society they first of all make sure to allot and define the lands of their inheritance, which first allotment is regarded as inalienable. No matter where a group or family move to in later times, the first land allotted to them is always regarded as "the land of their inheritance," thus {{s\|\|Alma\|22\|28}}; {{sv\|\|Alma\|54\|12—13}}; {{s\|\|Ether\|7\|16}}—in these cases the expression "land of ''first'' inheritance" is used ({{s\|\|Mormon\|2\|27—28}}; {{S\|1\|Nephi\|13\|15}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|35\|9,14}}; {{sv\|\|Alma\|43\|12}}; {{s\|\|Jacob\|3\|4}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|62\|42}}; {{s\|\|Mormon\|3\|17}}). This is a powerful argument for the authenticity of the Book of Mormon both because the existence of such a system is largely the discovery of modern research and because it is set forth in the Book of Mormon very distinctly and yet quite casually.<ref>{{Book:Nibley:CW06\|pages=[http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1107&index=11 Chapter 8], {{sofr}} {{eo}}}}</ref></onlyinclude>		:Such was the old aristocracy of Israel. Eduard Meyer says that all their power and authority went back originally to the first land-allotments made among the leaders of the migratory host when they settled down in their land of promise. Regardless of wealth of influence or ability, no one could belong to the old aristocracy who did not still possess "the land of his inheritance."14 This institution—or attitude—plays a remarkably conspicuous role in the Book of Mormon. Not only does Lehi leave "the land of his inheritance" ({{s\|1\|Nephi\|2\|4}}) but whenever his people wish to establish a new society they first of all make sure to allot and define the lands of their inheritance, which first allotment is regarded as inalienable. No matter where a group or family move to in later times, the first land allotted to them is always regarded as "the land of their inheritance," thus {{s\|\|Alma\|22\|28}}; {{sv\|\|Alma\|54\|12—13}}; {{s\|\|Ether\|7\|16}}—in these cases the expression "land of ''first'' inheritance" is used ({{s\|\|Mormon\|2\|27—28}}; {{S\|1\|Nephi\|13\|15}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|35\|9,14}}; {{sv\|\|Alma\|43\|12}}; {{s\|\|Jacob\|3\|4}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|62\|42}}; {{s\|\|Mormon\|3\|17}}). This is a powerful argument for the authenticity of the Book of Mormon both because the existence of such a system is largely the discovery of modern research and because it is set forth in the Book of Mormon very distinctly and yet quite casually.<ref>{{Book:Nibley:CW06\|pages=[http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1107&index=11 Chapter 8], {{sofr}} {{eo}}}}</ref></onlyinclude>

RogerNicholson: RogerNicholson moved page Source:Nibley:CW06:Ch8:6 to Source:Nibley:CW06:Ch8:6:Lands of inheritance

2014-09-03T01:19:59Z

RogerNicholson moved page Source:Nibley:CW06:Ch8:6 to Source:Nibley:CW06:Ch8:6:Lands of inheritance

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:19, 3 September 2014
(No difference)

RogerNicholson: m

2014-09-03T01:19:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:19, 3 September 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\|catname=		\|catname=
	}}<onlyinclude>		}}<onlyinclude>
	===Lands of inheritance===		==Lands of inheritance==

	:Such was the old aristocracy of Israel. Eduard Meyer says that all their power and authority went back originally to the first land-allotments made among the leaders of the migratory host when they settled down in their land of promise. Regardless of wealth of influence or ability, no one could belong to the old aristocracy who did not still possess "the land of his inheritance."14 This institution—or attitude—plays a remarkably conspicuous role in the Book of Mormon. Not only does Lehi leave "the land of his inheritance" ({{s\|1\|Nephi\|2\|4}}) but whenever his people wish to establish a new society they first of all make sure to allot and define the lands of their inheritance, which first allotment is regarded as inalienable. No matter where a group or family move to in later times, the first land allotted to them is always regarded as "the land of their inheritance," thus {{s\|\|Alma\|22\|28}}; {{sv\|\|Alma\|54\|12—13}}; {{s\|\|Ether\|7\|16}}—in these cases the expression "land of ''first'' inheritance" is used ({{s\|\|Mormon\|2\|27—28}}; {{S\|1\|Nephi\|13\|15}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|35\|9,14}}; {{sv\|\|Alma\|43\|12}}; {{s\|\|Jacob\|3\|4}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|62\|42}}; {{s\|\|Mormon\|3\|17}}). This is a powerful argument for the authenticity of the Book of Mormon both because the existence of such a system is largely the discovery of modern research and because it is set forth in the Book of Mormon very distinctly and yet quite casually.<ref>{{Book:Nibley:CW06\|pages=[http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1107&index=11 Chapter 8], {{sofr}} {{eo}}}}</ref></onlyinclude>		:Such was the old aristocracy of Israel. Eduard Meyer says that all their power and authority went back originally to the first land-allotments made among the leaders of the migratory host when they settled down in their land of promise. Regardless of wealth of influence or ability, no one could belong to the old aristocracy who did not still possess "the land of his inheritance."14 This institution—or attitude—plays a remarkably conspicuous role in the Book of Mormon. Not only does Lehi leave "the land of his inheritance" ({{s\|1\|Nephi\|2\|4}}) but whenever his people wish to establish a new society they first of all make sure to allot and define the lands of their inheritance, which first allotment is regarded as inalienable. No matter where a group or family move to in later times, the first land allotted to them is always regarded as "the land of their inheritance," thus {{s\|\|Alma\|22\|28}}; {{sv\|\|Alma\|54\|12—13}}; {{s\|\|Ether\|7\|16}}—in these cases the expression "land of ''first'' inheritance" is used ({{s\|\|Mormon\|2\|27—28}}; {{S\|1\|Nephi\|13\|15}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|35\|9,14}}; {{sv\|\|Alma\|43\|12}}; {{s\|\|Jacob\|3\|4}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|62\|42}}; {{s\|\|Mormon\|3\|17}}). This is a powerful argument for the authenticity of the Book of Mormon both because the existence of such a system is largely the discovery of modern research and because it is set forth in the Book of Mormon very distinctly and yet quite casually.<ref>{{Book:Nibley:CW06\|pages=[http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1107&index=11 Chapter 8], {{sofr}} {{eo}}}}</ref></onlyinclude>
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Book of Mormon/Anthropology/Culture/Old World\|Old World]]		[[Category:Book of Mormon/Anthropology/Culture/Old World\|Old World]]
	[[Category:Book of Mormon/Anthropology/Politics\|Politics]]		[[Category:Book of Mormon/Anthropology/Politics\|Politics]]
	[[Category:~~Book of Mormon/Geography/Old World/~~Jerusalem]]		[[Category:Jerusalem]]

GregSmith at 14:11, 2 September 2014

2014-09-02T14:11:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 2 September 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<onlyinclude>		{{FME-Source
			\|title=Lands of inheritance
			\|category=
			\|catname=
			}}<onlyinclude>
	===Lands of inheritance===		===Lands of inheritance===

GregSmith at 04:44, 1 September 2014

2014-09-01T04:44:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 1 September 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:
	===Lands of inheritance===		===Lands of inheritance===

	:Such was the old aristocracy of Israel. Eduard Meyer says that all their power and authority went back originally to the first land-allotments made among the leaders of the migratory host when they settled down in their land of promise. Regardless of wealth of influence or ability, no one could belong to the old aristocracy who did not still possess "the land of his inheritance."14 This institution—or attitude—plays a remarkably conspicuous role in the Book of Mormon. Not only does Lehi leave "the land of his inheritance" (1 Nephi 2:4) but whenever his people wish to establish a new society they first of all make sure to allot and define the lands of their inheritance, which first allotment is regarded as inalienable. No matter where a group or family move to in later times, the first land allotted to them is always regarded as "the land of their inheritance," thus Alma 22:28; 54:12—13; Ether 7~~:16—in~~ these cases the expression "land of ''first'' inheritance" is used ({{s\|\|Mormon\|2\|27—28}}; {{S\|1\|Nephi\|13\|15}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|35:9,14}}; {{sv\|\|Alma\|43\|12}}; {{s\|\|Jacob\|3\|4}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|62\|42}}; {{s\|\|Mormon\|3\|17}}). This is a powerful argument for the authenticity of the Book of Mormon both because the existence of such a system is largely the discovery of modern research and because it is set forth in the Book of Mormon very distinctly and yet quite casually.<ref>{{Book:Nibley:CW06\|pages=[http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1107&index=11 Chapter 8], {{sofr}} {{eo}}}}</ref></onlyinclude>		:Such was the old aristocracy of Israel. Eduard Meyer says that all their power and authority went back originally to the first land-allotments made among the leaders of the migratory host when they settled down in their land of promise. Regardless of wealth of influence or ability, no one could belong to the old aristocracy who did not still possess "the land of his inheritance."14 This institution—or attitude—plays a remarkably conspicuous role in the Book of Mormon. Not only does Lehi leave "the land of his inheritance" ({{s\|1\|Nephi\|2\|4}}) but whenever his people wish to establish a new society they first of all make sure to allot and define the lands of their inheritance, which first allotment is regarded as inalienable. No matter where a group or family move to in later times, the first land allotted to them is always regarded as "the land of their inheritance," thus {{s\|\|Alma\|22\|28}}; {{sv\|\|Alma\|54\|12—13}}; {{s\|\|Ether\|7\|16}}—in these cases the expression "land of ''first'' inheritance" is used ({{s\|\|Mormon\|2\|27—28}}; {{S\|1\|Nephi\|13\|15}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|35\|9,14}}; {{sv\|\|Alma\|43\|12}}; {{s\|\|Jacob\|3\|4}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|62\|42}}; {{s\|\|Mormon\|3\|17}}). This is a powerful argument for the authenticity of the Book of Mormon both because the existence of such a system is largely the discovery of modern research and because it is set forth in the Book of Mormon very distinctly and yet quite casually.<ref>{{Book:Nibley:CW06\|pages=[http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1107&index=11 Chapter 8], {{sofr}} {{eo}}}}</ref></onlyinclude>

	{{Endnotes sources}}		{{Endnotes sources}}

GregSmith at 04:44, 1 September 2014

2014-09-01T04:44:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 1 September 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:
	===Lands of inheritance===		===Lands of inheritance===

	Such was the old aristocracy of Israel. Eduard Meyer says that all their power and authority went back originally to the first land-allotments made among the leaders of the migratory host when they settled down in their land of promise. Regardless of wealth of influence or ability, no one could belong to the old aristocracy who did not still possess "the land of his inheritance."14 This institution—or attitude—plays a remarkably conspicuous role in the Book of Mormon. Not only does Lehi leave "the land of his inheritance" (1 Nephi 2:4) but whenever his people wish to establish a new society they first of all make sure to allot and define the lands of their inheritance, which first allotment is regarded as inalienable. No matter where a group or family move to in later times, the first land allotted to them is always regarded as "the land of their inheritance," thus Alma 22:28; 54:12—13; Ether 7:16—in these cases the expression "land of ''first'' inheritance" is used ({{s\|\|Mormon\|2\|27—28}}; {{S\|1\|Nephi\|13\|15}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|35:9,14; {{sv\|\|Alma\|43\|12}}; {{s\|\|Jacob\|3\|4}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|62\|42}}; {{s\|\|Mormon\|3\|17}}). This is a powerful argument for the authenticity of the Book of Mormon both because the existence of such a system is largely the discovery of modern research and because it is set forth in the Book of Mormon very distinctly and yet quite casually.<ref>{{Book:Nibley:CW06\|pages=[http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1107&index=11 Chapter 8], {{sofr}} {{eo}}}}</ref></onlyinclude>		:Such was the old aristocracy of Israel. Eduard Meyer says that all their power and authority went back originally to the first land-allotments made among the leaders of the migratory host when they settled down in their land of promise. Regardless of wealth of influence or ability, no one could belong to the old aristocracy who did not still possess "the land of his inheritance."14 This institution—or attitude—plays a remarkably conspicuous role in the Book of Mormon. Not only does Lehi leave "the land of his inheritance" (1 Nephi 2:4) but whenever his people wish to establish a new society they first of all make sure to allot and define the lands of their inheritance, which first allotment is regarded as inalienable. No matter where a group or family move to in later times, the first land allotted to them is always regarded as "the land of their inheritance," thus Alma 22:28; 54:12—13; Ether 7:16—in these cases the expression "land of ''first'' inheritance" is used ({{s\|\|Mormon\|2\|27—28}}; {{S\|1\|Nephi\|13\|15}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|35:9,14}}; {{sv\|\|Alma\|43\|12}}; {{s\|\|Jacob\|3\|4}}; {{s\|\|Alma\|62\|42}}; {{s\|\|Mormon\|3\|17}}). This is a powerful argument for the authenticity of the Book of Mormon both because the existence of such a system is largely the discovery of modern research and because it is set forth in the Book of Mormon very distinctly and yet quite casually.<ref>{{Book:Nibley:CW06\|pages=[http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1107&index=11 Chapter 8], {{sofr}} {{eo}}}}</ref></onlyinclude>

	{{Endnotes sources}}		{{Endnotes sources}}

GregSmith: Created page with " ===Lands of inheritance=== Such was the old aristocracy of Israel. Eduard Meyer says that all their power and authority went back originally to the first land-a..."

2014-09-01T04:43:07Z

Created page with "<onlyinclude> ===Lands of inheritance=== Such was the old aristocracy of Israel. Eduard Meyer says that all their power and authority went back originally to the first land-a..."

New page

<onlyinclude>
===Lands of inheritance===

Such was the old aristocracy of Israel. Eduard Meyer says that all their power and authority went back originally to the first land-allotments made among the leaders of the migratory host when they settled down in their land of promise. Regardless of wealth of influence or ability, no one could belong to the old aristocracy who did not still possess "the land of his inheritance."14 This institution—or attitude—plays a remarkably conspicuous role in the Book of Mormon. Not only does Lehi leave "the land of his inheritance" (1 Nephi 2:4) but whenever his people wish to establish a new society they first of all make sure to allot and define the lands of their inheritance, which first allotment is regarded as inalienable. No matter where a group or family move to in later times, the first land allotted to them is always regarded as "the land of their inheritance," thus Alma 22:28; 54:12—13; Ether 7:16—in these cases the expression "land of ''first'' inheritance" is used ({{s||Mormon|2|27—28}}; {{S|1|Nephi|13|15}}; {{s||Alma|35:9,14; {{sv||Alma|43|12}}; {{s||Jacob|3|4}}; {{s||Alma|62|42}}; {{s||Mormon|3|17}}). This is a powerful argument for the authenticity of the Book of Mormon both because the existence of such a system is largely the discovery of modern research and because it is set forth in the Book of Mormon very distinctly and yet quite casually.<ref>{{Book:Nibley:CW06|pages=[http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1107&index=11 Chapter 8], {{sofr}} {{eo}}}}</ref></onlyinclude>

{{Endnotes sources}}

[[Category:Hugh Nibley]]
[[Category:An Approach to the Book of Mormon]]
[[Category:Collected Works of Hugh Nibley Vol. 06]]
[[Category:Book of Mormon/Anthropology/Culture/Old World|Old World]]
[[Category:Book of Mormon/Anthropology/Politics|Politics]]
[[Category:Book of Mormon/Geography/Old World/Jerusalem]]