Keskustelu:Bob McCue/Quotes and Responses - Muutoshistoria

RogerNicholson: Talk:Self-contradiction moved to Talk:Bob McCue/Quotes and Responses: Making a subpage

2008-05-10T13:03:38Z

Talk:Self-contradiction moved to Talk:Bob McCue/Quotes and Responses: Making a subpage

← Vanhempi versio	Versio 10. toukokuuta 2008 kello 13.03
(ei mitään eroa)

RogerNicholson: Talk:Lies and self-contradiction moved to Talk:Self-contradiction: Removing word "lies" from page title

2008-04-16T00:55:54Z

Talk:Lies and self-contradiction moved to Talk:Self-contradiction: Removing word "lies" from page title

← Vanhempi versio	Versio 16. huhtikuuta 2008 kello 00.55
(ei mitään eroa)

GregSmith (14. heinäkuuta 2006 kello 05.43)

2006-07-14T05:43:58Z

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 14. heinäkuuta 2006 kello 05.43
Rivi 12:		Rivi 12:

	I think adding something like that middle part would be helpful for people who are reading this article and have never heard of McCue. Does anyone agree? Or at least agree that something like that should be added in, though not those exact words?		I think adding something like that middle part would be helpful for people who are reading this article and have never heard of McCue. Does anyone agree? Or at least agree that something like that should be added in, though not those exact words?

			* I think it gives McCue too much credit as worded. He's not well known except in a limited circle. McCue loves being important and the center of attention; I'd be reluctant to swell his head any further by calling him "premier." :-) I'd vote for something else, maybe something along the lines of: "The large volume of McCue's output is regarded as tedious by some, while some critics consider his work valuable?"[[User:GregSmith\|Greg Smith]] 23:43, 13 Jul 2006 (MDT)

DavidFerguson: asking for an opinion about adding to McCue section

2006-07-10T04:08:41Z

asking for an opinion about adding to McCue section

Uusi sivu

The article says:

:Robert "Bob" McCue is a lawyer from Calgary, Alberta. A former LDS bishop, McCue has left the Church and now writes large amounts of material about his former faith.

Would it be appropriate to add something like:

:He is regarded as one of the premier anti-Mormons in Canada who's research on the subject of Mormonism is highly regarded by skeptics and antagonists.

And then move on to the rest:

:Sadly, McCue is not always straightforward with his readers. On occasion, he changes his claims to suit the needs of the moment. In addition, a comparison between the LDS doctrine which he taught before his apostasy, and LDS doctrine as he describes it after leaving the Church is instructive:

I think adding something like that middle part would be helpful for people who are reading this article and have never heard of McCue. Does anyone agree? Or at least agree that something like that should be added in, though not those exact words?