Malline:FeaturedArticles - Muutoshistoria

RKMBot: Don't need interwiki links between templates

2017-06-06T20:22:37Z

Don't need interwiki links between templates

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 6. kesäkuuta 2017 kello 20.22
Rivi 14:		Rivi 14:
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''<noinclude>		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''<noinclude>
	~~[[fr:Modèle:FeaturedArticles]]~~
	</noinclude>		</noinclude>

RogerNicholson: format

2010-05-14T01:14:18Z

format

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 14. toukokuuta 2010 kello 01.14
Rivi 1:		Rivi 1:
	{{editme\|url=Template:FeaturedArticles\|before=\|after='''''Current Features'''''}}		{{editme\|url=Template:FeaturedArticles\|before=\|after='''''Current Features'''''}}
	'''Analysis and response to the article "Reinventing Lamanite Identity," by Brent Lee Metcalfe, published in Sunstone, March 2004,		'''Analysis and response to the article "Reinventing Lamanite Identity," by Brent Lee Metcalfe, published in Sunstone, March 2004, 20-25.'''
	20-25.'''

	Critics who wish to use DNA evidence to disprove the Book of Mormon must use a hemispheric model of the lands described in the book and assume that the Lehites and Mulekites arrived on an empty continent. The article argues for a traditional interpretation of the Book of Mormon which would exclude the presence of others on the American continents and thereby enable critical DNA claims to be valid. The article's claims are examined one-by-one and links to corresponding responses in the FAIR Wiki are provided. The analysis can be found here:		Critics who wish to use DNA evidence to disprove the Book of Mormon must use a hemispheric model of the lands described in the book and assume that the Lehites and Mulekites arrived on an empty continent. The article argues for a traditional interpretation of the Book of Mormon which would exclude the presence of others on the American continents and thereby enable critical DNA claims to be valid. The article's claims are examined one-by-one and links to corresponding responses in the FAIR Wiki are provided. The analysis can be found here:

RogerNicholson: format

2010-05-14T01:13:54Z

format

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 14. toukokuuta 2010 kello 01.13
Rivi 1:		Rivi 1:
	{{editme\|url=Template:FeaturedArticles\|before=\|after='''''Current Features'''''}}		{{editme\|url=Template:FeaturedArticles\|before=\|after='''''Current Features'''''}}
	Analysis and response to the article "Reinventing Lamanite Identity," by Brent Lee Metcalfe, published in Sunstone, March 2004,		'''Analysis and response to the article "Reinventing Lamanite Identity," by Brent Lee Metcalfe, published in Sunstone, March 2004,
	20-25. Critics who wish to use DNA evidence to disprove the Book of Mormon must use a hemispheric model of the lands described in the book and assume that the Lehites and Mulekites arrived on an empty continent. The article argues for a traditional interpretation of the Book of Mormon which would exclude the presence of others on the American continents and thereby enable critical DNA claims to be valid. The article's claims are examined one-by-one and links to corresponding responses in the FAIR Wiki are provided. The analysis can be found here:		20-25.'''

			Critics who wish to use DNA evidence to disprove the Book of Mormon must use a hemispheric model of the lands described in the book and assume that the Lehites and Mulekites arrived on an empty continent. The article argues for a traditional interpretation of the Book of Mormon which would exclude the presence of others on the American continents and thereby enable critical DNA claims to be valid. The article's claims are examined one-by-one and links to corresponding responses in the FAIR Wiki are provided. The analysis can be found here:

	*'''[[Specific works/Reinventing Lamanite Identity\|A FAIR Analysis of: ''Reinventing Lamanite Identity'']]		*'''[[Specific works/Reinventing Lamanite Identity\|A FAIR Analysis of: ''Reinventing Lamanite Identity'']]

RogerNicholson: format

2010-05-14T01:12:55Z

format

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 14. toukokuuta 2010 kello 01.12
Rivi 3:		Rivi 3:
	20-25. Critics who wish to use DNA evidence to disprove the Book of Mormon must use a hemispheric model of the lands described in the book and assume that the Lehites and Mulekites arrived on an empty continent. The article argues for a traditional interpretation of the Book of Mormon which would exclude the presence of others on the American continents and thereby enable critical DNA claims to be valid. The article's claims are examined one-by-one and links to corresponding responses in the FAIR Wiki are provided. The analysis can be found here:		20-25. Critics who wish to use DNA evidence to disprove the Book of Mormon must use a hemispheric model of the lands described in the book and assume that the Lehites and Mulekites arrived on an empty continent. The article argues for a traditional interpretation of the Book of Mormon which would exclude the presence of others on the American continents and thereby enable critical DNA claims to be valid. The article's claims are examined one-by-one and links to corresponding responses in the FAIR Wiki are provided. The analysis can be found here:

	'''[[Specific works/Reinventing Lamanite Identity\|A FAIR Analysis of: ''Reinventing Lamanite Identity'']]		*'''[[Specific works/Reinventing Lamanite Identity\|A FAIR Analysis of: ''Reinventing Lamanite Identity'']]

	*'''Elder Holland's General Conference Talk (Oct. 4, 2009)'''		'''Elder Holland's General Conference Talk (Oct. 4, 2009)'''
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>
	For 179 years this book has been examined and attacked, denied and deconstructed, targeted and torn apart like perhaps no other book in modern religious history—perhaps like no other book in any religious history. And still it stands. Failed theories about its origins have been born and parroted and have died—from Ethan Smith to Solomon Spaulding to deranged paranoid to cunning genius. None of these frankly pathetic answers for this book has ever withstood examination because ''there is no other answer'' than the one Joseph gave as its young unlearned translator. In this I stand with my own great-grandfather, who said simply enough, “No wicked man could write such a book as this; and no good man would write it, unless it were true and he were commanded of God to do so.”<br>		For 179 years this book has been examined and attacked, denied and deconstructed, targeted and torn apart like perhaps no other book in modern religious history—perhaps like no other book in any religious history. And still it stands. Failed theories about its origins have been born and parroted and have died—from Ethan Smith to Solomon Spaulding to deranged paranoid to cunning genius. None of these frankly pathetic answers for this book has ever withstood examination because ''there is no other answer'' than the one Joseph gave as its young unlearned translator. In this I stand with my own great-grandfather, who said simply enough, “No wicked man could write such a book as this; and no good man would write it, unless it were true and he were commanded of God to do so.”<br>

RogerNicholson: mod

2010-05-14T01:12:24Z

mod

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 14. toukokuuta 2010 kello 01.12
Rivi 1:		Rivi 1:
	{{editme\|url=Template:FeaturedArticles\|before=\|after='''''Current Features'''''}}		{{editme\|url=Template:FeaturedArticles\|before=\|after='''''Current Features'''''}}
			Analysis and response to the article "Reinventing Lamanite Identity," by Brent Lee Metcalfe, published in Sunstone, March 2004,
			20-25. Critics who wish to use DNA evidence to disprove the Book of Mormon must use a hemispheric model of the lands described in the book and assume that the Lehites and Mulekites arrived on an empty continent. The article argues for a traditional interpretation of the Book of Mormon which would exclude the presence of others on the American continents and thereby enable critical DNA claims to be valid. The article's claims are examined one-by-one and links to corresponding responses in the FAIR Wiki are provided. The analysis can be found here:

			'''[[Specific works/Reinventing Lamanite Identity\|A FAIR Analysis of: ''Reinventing Lamanite Identity'']]

	*'''Elder Holland's General Conference Talk (Oct. 4, 2009)'''		*'''Elder Holland's General Conference Talk (Oct. 4, 2009)'''
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>

GregSmith: robot Adding: fr:Modèle:FeaturedArticles

2010-05-03T23:28:09Z

robot Adding: fr:Modèle:FeaturedArticles

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 3. toukokuuta 2010 kello 23.28
Rivi 7:		Rivi 7:
	*Elder Holland gave a powerful testimony about the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon. During the course of his talk he mentioned two secular Book of Mormon authorship theories. So who are Ethan Smith and Solomon Spalding? What is the best that critics have been able to come up with to explain away the origin of the Book of Mormon? Read the articles below to find out.		*Elder Holland gave a powerful testimony about the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon. During the course of his talk he mentioned two secular Book of Mormon authorship theories. So who are Ethan Smith and Solomon Spalding? What is the best that critics have been able to come up with to explain away the origin of the Book of Mormon? Read the articles below to find out.
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''<noinclude>
			[[fr:Modèle:FeaturedArticles]]
			</noinclude>

RogerNicholson: mv

2010-02-28T04:09:24Z

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 28. helmikuuta 2010 kello 04.09
Rivi 8:		Rivi 8:
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''

	*'''[[Website reviews\|FAIR web site reviews.]]''' Many web sites critical of the Church are very obvious in their mission—to pull the foundation from members' faith. Some, however, are much more subtle in their approach. These sites are claimed to be operated by active and believing members of the Church. Their message, unfortunately, is not consistent with building or supporting faith. FAIR reviews one such site.
	**'''[[Website reviews/MormonThink\|A FAIR Analysis of ''MormonThink.com'']]

RogerNicholson: mv

2010-02-28T04:05:51Z

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 28. helmikuuta 2010 kello 04.05
Rivi 8:		Rivi 8:
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''

	*'''[[Mormonism and Wikipedia]]'''. FAIR regularly receives queries about specific LDS-themed Wikipedia articles with requests that we somehow "fix" them. Although some individual members of FAIR may choose to edit Wikipedia articles, FAIR as an organization does not. Controversial Wikipedia articles require constant maintenance and a significant amount of time. We prefer instead to respond to claims in the FAIR Wiki rather than fight the ongoing battle that LDS Wikipedia articles sometimes invite. From FAIR’s perspective, assertions made in LDS-themed Wikipedia articles are therefore treated just like any other critical (or, if one prefers, "anti-Mormon") work. FAIR examines and responds to several LDS-related Wikipedia articles in detail:
	**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/First Vision\|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"''']]
	**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/Joseph Smith, Jr.\|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "Joseph Smith, Jr."''']]
	**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/Golden plates\|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "Golden plates"''']]
	**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/Three Witnesses\|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "Three Witnesses"''']]

	*'''[[Website reviews\|FAIR web site reviews.]]''' Many web sites critical of the Church are very obvious in their mission—to pull the foundation from members' faith. Some, however, are much more subtle in their approach. These sites are claimed to be operated by active and believing members of the Church. Their message, unfortunately, is not consistent with building or supporting faith. FAIR reviews one such site.		*'''[[Website reviews\|FAIR web site reviews.]]''' Many web sites critical of the Church are very obvious in their mission—to pull the foundation from members' faith. Some, however, are much more subtle in their approach. These sites are claimed to be operated by active and believing members of the Church. Their message, unfortunately, is not consistent with building or supporting faith. FAIR reviews one such site.
	**'''[[Website reviews/MormonThink\|A FAIR Analysis of ''MormonThink.com'']]		**'''[[Website reviews/MormonThink\|A FAIR Analysis of ''MormonThink.com'']]

RogerNicholson: update

2010-02-12T04:41:26Z

update

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 12. helmikuuta 2010 kello 04.41
Rivi 2:		Rivi 2:
	*'''Elder Holland's General Conference Talk (Oct. 4, 2009)'''		*'''Elder Holland's General Conference Talk (Oct. 4, 2009)'''
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>
	''For 179 years this book has been examined, and attacked~~. Denied~~ and deconstructed~~. Targeted~~ and torn apart, like perhaps no other book in modern religious ~~history. Perhaps~~ like no other book in any religious history~~, and~~ still, it stands. Failed theories about its origins have been born, parroted and ~~died. From~~ Ethan Smith to Solomon ~~Spalding,~~ to deranged paranoid, to cunning genius. None of these frankly pathetic answers for this book has ever withstood examination, because there is no other answer than the one Joseph gave as its young, unlearned translator.''<br>		For 179 years this book has been examined and attacked, denied and deconstructed, targeted and torn apart like perhaps no other book in modern religious history—perhaps like no other book in any religious history. And still it stands. Failed theories about its origins have been born and parroted and have died—from Ethan Smith to Solomon Spaulding to deranged paranoid to cunning genius. None of these frankly pathetic answers for this book has ever withstood examination because ''there is no other answer'' than the one Joseph gave as its young unlearned translator. In this I stand with my own great-grandfather, who said simply enough, “No wicked man could write such a book as this; and no good man would write it, unless it were true and he were commanded of God to do so.”<br>
	~~Elder~~ Jeffrey R. Holland, ~~General Conference talk~~, ~~Oct. 4~~, 2009		—Jeffrey R. Holland, [http://www.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?hideNav=1&locale=0&sourceId=77ee56627ab94210VgnVCM100000176f620a____&vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD “Safety for the Soul,”] Ensign, Nov 2009, 88–90
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>
	*Elder Holland gave a powerful testimony about the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon. During the course of his talk he mentioned two secular Book of Mormon authorship theories. So who are Ethan Smith and Solomon Spalding? What is the best that critics have been able to come up with to explain away the origin of the Book of Mormon? Read the articles below to find out.		*Elder Holland gave a powerful testimony about the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon. During the course of his talk he mentioned two secular Book of Mormon authorship theories. So who are Ethan Smith and Solomon Spalding? What is the best that critics have been able to come up with to explain away the origin of the Book of Mormon? Read the articles below to find out.

RogerNicholson: mod

2010-01-18T00:43:10Z

mod

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 18. tammikuuta 2010 kello 00.43
Rivi 9:		Rivi 9:
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''

	*'''[[Mormonism and Wikipedia]]'''. FAIR regularly receives queries about specific LDS-themed Wikipedia articles with requests that we somehow "fix" them. Although some individual members of FAIR may choose to edit Wikipedia articles, FAIR as an organization does not. Controversial Wikipedia articles require constant maintenance and a significant amount of time. We prefer instead to respond to claims in the FAIR Wiki rather than fight the ongoing battle that LDS Wikipedia articles sometimes invite. From FAIR’s perspective, assertions made in LDS-themed Wikipedia articles are therefore treated just like any other critical (or, if one prefers, "anti-Mormon") work. FAIR examines and responds to ~~three~~ LDS-related Wikipedia articles in detail:		*'''[[Mormonism and Wikipedia]]'''. FAIR regularly receives queries about specific LDS-themed Wikipedia articles with requests that we somehow "fix" them. Although some individual members of FAIR may choose to edit Wikipedia articles, FAIR as an organization does not. Controversial Wikipedia articles require constant maintenance and a significant amount of time. We prefer instead to respond to claims in the FAIR Wiki rather than fight the ongoing battle that LDS Wikipedia articles sometimes invite. From FAIR’s perspective, assertions made in LDS-themed Wikipedia articles are therefore treated just like any other critical (or, if one prefers, "anti-Mormon") work. FAIR examines and responds to several LDS-related Wikipedia articles in detail:
	**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/First Vision\|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"''']]		**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/First Vision\|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"''']]
	**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/Joseph Smith, Jr.\|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "Joseph Smith, Jr."''']]		**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/Joseph Smith, Jr.\|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "Joseph Smith, Jr."''']]

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 28. helmikuuta 2010 kello 04.09
Rivi 8:		Rivi 8:
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''

	*'''[[Website reviews\|FAIR web site reviews.]]''' Many web sites critical of the Church are very obvious in their mission—to pull the foundation from members' faith. Some, however, are much more subtle in their approach. These sites are claimed to be operated by active and believing members of the Church. Their message, unfortunately, is not consistent with building or supporting faith. FAIR reviews one such site.
	**'''[[Website reviews/MormonThink\|A FAIR Analysis of ''MormonThink.com'']]

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 28. helmikuuta 2010 kello 04.05
Rivi 8:		Rivi 8:
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''
	**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''		**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript\|Book of Mormon Authorship theories—Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''

	*'''[[Mormonism and Wikipedia]]'''. FAIR regularly receives queries about specific LDS-themed Wikipedia articles with requests that we somehow "fix" them. Although some individual members of FAIR may choose to edit Wikipedia articles, FAIR as an organization does not. Controversial Wikipedia articles require constant maintenance and a significant amount of time. We prefer instead to respond to claims in the FAIR Wiki rather than fight the ongoing battle that LDS Wikipedia articles sometimes invite. From FAIR’s perspective, assertions made in LDS-themed Wikipedia articles are therefore treated just like any other critical (or, if one prefers, "anti-Mormon") work. FAIR examines and responds to several LDS-related Wikipedia articles in detail:
	**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/First Vision\|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"''']]
	**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/Joseph Smith, Jr.\|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "Joseph Smith, Jr."''']]
	**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/Golden plates\|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "Golden plates"''']]
	**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/Three Witnesses\|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "Three Witnesses"''']]

	*'''[[Website reviews\|FAIR web site reviews.]]''' Many web sites critical of the Church are very obvious in their mission—to pull the foundation from members' faith. Some, however, are much more subtle in their approach. These sites are claimed to be operated by active and believing members of the Church. Their message, unfortunately, is not consistent with building or supporting faith. FAIR reviews one such site.		*'''[[Website reviews\|FAIR web site reviews.]]''' Many web sites critical of the Church are very obvious in their mission—to pull the foundation from members' faith. Some, however, are much more subtle in their approach. These sites are claimed to be operated by active and believing members of the Church. Their message, unfortunately, is not consistent with building or supporting faith. FAIR reviews one such site.
	**'''[[Website reviews/MormonThink\|A FAIR Analysis of ''MormonThink.com'']]		**'''[[Website reviews/MormonThink\|A FAIR Analysis of ''MormonThink.com'']]