Malline:NoOfficial - Muutoshistoria

RKMBot: Don't need interwiki links between templates

2017-06-06T20:24:53Z

Don't need interwiki links between templates

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 6. kesäkuuta 2017 kello 20.24
Rivi 23:		Rivi 23:

	{{Main\|Church doctrine/Statements by Church leaders\|l1=Official doctrine in the Church}}<noinclude>		{{Main\|Church doctrine/Statements by Church leaders\|l1=Official doctrine in the Church}}<noinclude>
	~~[[fr:Modèle:NoOfficial]]~~
	</noinclude>		</noinclude>

GregSmith: robot Adding: fr:Modèle:NoOfficial

2010-05-04T04:00:14Z

robot Adding: fr:Modèle:NoOfficial

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 4. toukokuuta 2010 kello 04.00
Rivi 22:		Rivi 22:
	:—LDS Newsroom, "Approaching Mormon Doctrine," ''lds.org'' (4 May 2007) {{link\|url=http://newsroom.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/commentary/approaching-mormon-doctrine}}]		:—LDS Newsroom, "Approaching Mormon Doctrine," ''lds.org'' (4 May 2007) {{link\|url=http://newsroom.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/commentary/approaching-mormon-doctrine}}]

	{{Main\|Church doctrine/Statements by Church leaders\|l1=Official doctrine in the Church}}		{{Main\|Church doctrine/Statements by Church leaders\|l1=Official doctrine in the Church}}<noinclude>
			[[fr:Modèle:NoOfficial]]
			</noinclude>

GregSmith (26. joulukuuta 2009 kello 23.18)

2009-12-26T23:18:19Z

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 26. joulukuuta 2009 kello 23.18
Rivi 1:		Rivi 1:
	==The Church does not take an official position on this issue==		==The Church does not take an official position on this issue==
	{{Main\|Fallibility of prophets\|Changing doctrine}}		{{Main\|Church doctrine/Statements by Church leaders\|l1=Fallibility of prophets\|Church doctrine/Changing\|l2=Does LDS doctrine change?}}

	This is one of many issues about which the Church has no official position. As President J. Reuben Clark taught under assignment from the First Presidency:		This is one of many issues about which the Church has no official position. As President J. Reuben Clark taught under assignment from the First Presidency:
Rivi 22:		Rivi 22:
	:—LDS Newsroom, "Approaching Mormon Doctrine," ''lds.org'' (4 May 2007) {{link\|url=http://newsroom.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/commentary/approaching-mormon-doctrine}}]		:—LDS Newsroom, "Approaching Mormon Doctrine," ''lds.org'' (4 May 2007) {{link\|url=http://newsroom.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/commentary/approaching-mormon-doctrine}}]

	~~(''For further discussion of this principle see:'' FAIR wiki article: [[Fallibility_of_prophets~~\|~~Official~~ Church doctrine ~~and statements~~ by Church leaders~~]].)~~		{{Main\|Church doctrine/Statements by Church leaders\|l1=Official doctrine in the Church}}

GregSmith (26. joulukuuta 2009 kello 23.09)

2009-12-26T23:09:39Z

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 26. joulukuuta 2009 kello 23.09
Rivi 9:		Rivi 9:

	:''Of these things we may have a confident assurance without chance for doubt or quibbling.''		:''Of these things we may have a confident assurance without chance for doubt or quibbling.''
	:—J. Reuben Clark, Jr. "When Are the Writings or Sermons of Church Leaders Entitled to the Claim of Scripture?" ~~Address~~ to Seminary and Institute Teachers, BYU (7 July 1954); reproduced in ''Church News'' (31 July 1954); also reprinted in ''Dialogue'' 12/2 (Summer 1979): 68–81.]		:—J. Reuben Clark, Jr., "Church Leaders and the Scriptures," [orginal title "When Are the Writings or Sermons of Church Leaders Entitled to the Claim of Scripture?"] ''Immortality and Eternal Life: Reflections from the Writings and Messages of President J. Reuben Clark, Jr.'', Vol, 2, (1969-70): 221; address to Seminary and Institute Teachers, BYU (7 July 1954); reproduced in ''Church News'' (31 July 1954); also reprinted in ''Dialogue'' 12/2 (Summer 1979): 68–81.

	Harold B. Lee was emphatic that only one person can speak for the Church:		Harold B. Lee was emphatic that only one person can speak for the Church:

GregSmith (20. marraskuuta 2009 kello 08.36)

2009-11-20T08:36:28Z

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 20. marraskuuta 2009 kello 08.36
Rivi 15:		Rivi 15:
	:All over the Church you're being asked this: "What does the Church think about this or that?" Have you ever heard anybody ask that question? "What does the Church think about the civil rights legislation?" "What do they think about the war?" "What do they think about drinking Coca-Cola or Sanka coffee?" Did you ever hear that? "What do they think about the Democratic Party or ticket or the Republican ticket?" Did you ever hear that? "How should we vote in this forthcoming election?" Now, with most all of those questions, if you answer them, you're going to be in trouble. Most all of them. Now, it's the smart man that will say, "There's only one man in this church that speaks for the Church, and I'm not that one man."		:All over the Church you're being asked this: "What does the Church think about this or that?" Have you ever heard anybody ask that question? "What does the Church think about the civil rights legislation?" "What do they think about the war?" "What do they think about drinking Coca-Cola or Sanka coffee?" Did you ever hear that? "What do they think about the Democratic Party or ticket or the Republican ticket?" Did you ever hear that? "How should we vote in this forthcoming election?" Now, with most all of those questions, if you answer them, you're going to be in trouble. Most all of them. Now, it's the smart man that will say, "There's only one man in this church that speaks for the Church, and I'm not that one man."

	:I think nothing could get you into deep ~~waterquicker~~ than to answer people on these things, when they say, "What does the Church think?" and you want to be smart, so you try to answer what the Church's policy is. Well, you're not the one to make the policies for the Church. You just remember what the Apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthians. He said, "For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified" (1 Corinthians 2:2). Well now, as teachers of our youth, you're not supposed to know anything except Jesus Christ and Him crucified. On that subject you're expected to be an expert. You're expected to know your subject. You're expected to have a testimony. And in that you'll have great strength. If the President of the Church has not declared the position of the Church, then you shouldn't go shopping for the answer. ({{THBL1\|start=445}})		:I think nothing could get you into deep water quicker than to answer people on these things, when they say, "What does the Church think?" and you want to be smart, so you try to answer what the Church's policy is. Well, you're not the one to make the policies for the Church. You just remember what the Apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthians. He said, "For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified" ({{b\|1\|Corinthians\|2\|2}}). Well now, as teachers of our youth, you're not supposed to know anything except Jesus Christ and Him crucified. On that subject you're expected to be an expert. You're expected to know your subject. You're expected to have a testimony. And in that you'll have great strength. If the President of the Church has not declared the position of the Church, then you shouldn't go shopping for the answer. ({{THBL1\|start=445}})

	This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on the Church's official website):		This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on the Church's official website):

GregSmith: /* The Church does not take an official position on this issue */

2009-05-24T03:55:40Z

The Church does not take an official position on this issue

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 24. toukokuuta 2009 kello 03.55
Rivi 15:		Rivi 15:
	:All over the Church you're being asked this: "What does the Church think about this or that?" Have you ever heard anybody ask that question? "What does the Church think about the civil rights legislation?" "What do they think about the war?" "What do they think about drinking Coca-Cola or Sanka coffee?" Did you ever hear that? "What do they think about the Democratic Party or ticket or the Republican ticket?" Did you ever hear that? "How should we vote in this forthcoming election?" Now, with most all of those questions, if you answer them, you're going to be in trouble. Most all of them. Now, it's the smart man that will say, "There's only one man in this church that speaks for the Church, and I'm not that one man."		:All over the Church you're being asked this: "What does the Church think about this or that?" Have you ever heard anybody ask that question? "What does the Church think about the civil rights legislation?" "What do they think about the war?" "What do they think about drinking Coca-Cola or Sanka coffee?" Did you ever hear that? "What do they think about the Democratic Party or ticket or the Republican ticket?" Did you ever hear that? "How should we vote in this forthcoming election?" Now, with most all of those questions, if you answer them, you're going to be in trouble. Most all of them. Now, it's the smart man that will say, "There's only one man in this church that speaks for the Church, and I'm not that one man."

	:I think nothing could get you into deep waterquicker than to answer people on these things, when they say, "What does the Church think?" and you want to be smart, so you try to answer what the Church's policy is. Well, you're not the one to make the policies for the Church. You just remember what the Apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthians. He said, "For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified" (1 Corinthians 2:2). Well now, as teachers of our youth, you're not supposed to know anything except Jesus Christ and Him crucified. On that subject you're expected to be an expert. You're expected to know your subject. You're expected to have a testimony. And in that you'll have great strength. If the President of the Church has not declared the position of the Church, then you shouldn't go shopping for the answer. (~~''Teachings of Harold B. Lee,~~ 445)		:I think nothing could get you into deep waterquicker than to answer people on these things, when they say, "What does the Church think?" and you want to be smart, so you try to answer what the Church's policy is. Well, you're not the one to make the policies for the Church. You just remember what the Apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthians. He said, "For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified" (1 Corinthians 2:2). Well now, as teachers of our youth, you're not supposed to know anything except Jesus Christ and Him crucified. On that subject you're expected to be an expert. You're expected to know your subject. You're expected to have a testimony. And in that you'll have great strength. If the President of the Church has not declared the position of the Church, then you shouldn't go shopping for the answer. ({{THBL1\|start=445}})

	This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on the Church's official website):		This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on the Church's official website):

GregSmith: /* The Church does not take an official position on this issue */

2009-05-24T03:30:14Z

The Church does not take an official position on this issue

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 24. toukokuuta 2009 kello 03.30
Rivi 10:		Rivi 10:
	:''Of these things we may have a confident assurance without chance for doubt or quibbling.''		:''Of these things we may have a confident assurance without chance for doubt or quibbling.''
	:—J. Reuben Clark, Jr. "When Are the Writings or Sermons of Church Leaders Entitled to the Claim of Scripture?" Address to Seminary and Institute Teachers, BYU (7 July 1954); reproduced in ''Church News'' (31 July 1954); also reprinted in ''Dialogue'' 12/2 (Summer 1979): 68–81.]		:—J. Reuben Clark, Jr. "When Are the Writings or Sermons of Church Leaders Entitled to the Claim of Scripture?" Address to Seminary and Institute Teachers, BYU (7 July 1954); reproduced in ''Church News'' (31 July 1954); also reprinted in ''Dialogue'' 12/2 (Summer 1979): 68–81.]

			Harold B. Lee was emphatic that only one person can speak for the Church:

			:All over the Church you're being asked this: "What does the Church think about this or that?" Have you ever heard anybody ask that question? "What does the Church think about the civil rights legislation?" "What do they think about the war?" "What do they think about drinking Coca-Cola or Sanka coffee?" Did you ever hear that? "What do they think about the Democratic Party or ticket or the Republican ticket?" Did you ever hear that? "How should we vote in this forthcoming election?" Now, with most all of those questions, if you answer them, you're going to be in trouble. Most all of them. Now, it's the smart man that will say, "There's only one man in this church that speaks for the Church, and I'm not that one man."

			:I think nothing could get you into deep waterquicker than to answer people on these things, when they say, "What does the Church think?" and you want to be smart, so you try to answer what the Church's policy is. Well, you're not the one to make the policies for the Church. You just remember what the Apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthians. He said, "For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified" (1 Corinthians 2:2). Well now, as teachers of our youth, you're not supposed to know anything except Jesus Christ and Him crucified. On that subject you're expected to be an expert. You're expected to know your subject. You're expected to have a testimony. And in that you'll have great strength. If the President of the Church has not declared the position of the Church, then you shouldn't go shopping for the answer. (''Teachings of Harold B. Lee, 445)

	This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on the Church's official website):		This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on the Church's official website):

DavidKeller: /* The Church does not take an official position on this issue */ spelling

2008-12-03T04:59:12Z

The Church does not take an official position on this issue: spelling

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 3. joulukuuta 2008 kello 04.59
Rivi 2:		Rivi 2:
	{{Main\|Fallibility of prophets\|Changing doctrine}}		{{Main\|Fallibility of prophets\|Changing doctrine}}

	This is one of many issues about which the Church has no official position. As President J. ~~Rueben~~ Clark taught under assignment from the First Presidency:		This is one of many issues about which the Church has no official position. As President J. Reuben Clark taught under assignment from the First Presidency:

	:''Here we must have in mind—must know—that only the President of the Church, the Presiding High Priest, is sustained as Prophet, Seer, and Revelator for the Church, and he alone has the right to receive revelations for the Church, either new or amendatory, or to give authoritative interpretations of scriptures that shall be binding on the Church....''		:''Here we must have in mind—must know—that only the President of the Church, the Presiding High Priest, is sustained as Prophet, Seer, and Revelator for the Church, and he alone has the right to receive revelations for the Church, either new or amendatory, or to give authoritative interpretations of scriptures that shall be binding on the Church....''
Rivi 9:		Rivi 9:

	:''Of these things we may have a confident assurance without chance for doubt or quibbling.''		:''Of these things we may have a confident assurance without chance for doubt or quibbling.''
	:—J. ~~Rueben~~ Clark, Jr. "When Are the Writings or Sermons of Church Leaders Entitled to the Claim of Scripture?" Address to Seminary and Institute Teachers, BYU (7 July 1954); reproduced in ''Church News'' (31 July 1954); also reprinted in ''Dialogue'' 12/2 (Summer 1979): 68–81.]		:—J. Reuben Clark, Jr. "When Are the Writings or Sermons of Church Leaders Entitled to the Claim of Scripture?" Address to Seminary and Institute Teachers, BYU (7 July 1954); reproduced in ''Church News'' (31 July 1954); also reprinted in ''Dialogue'' 12/2 (Summer 1979): 68–81.]

	This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on the Church's official website):		This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on the Church's official website):

GregSmith (2. joulukuuta 2008 kello 19.07)

2008-12-02T19:07:18Z

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 2. joulukuuta 2008 kello 19.07
Rivi 11:		Rivi 11:
	:—J. Rueben Clark, Jr. "When Are the Writings or Sermons of Church Leaders Entitled to the Claim of Scripture?" Address to Seminary and Institute Teachers, BYU (7 July 1954); reproduced in ''Church News'' (31 July 1954); also reprinted in ''Dialogue'' 12/2 (Summer 1979): 68–81.]		:—J. Rueben Clark, Jr. "When Are the Writings or Sermons of Church Leaders Entitled to the Claim of Scripture?" Address to Seminary and Institute Teachers, BYU (7 July 1954); reproduced in ''Church News'' (31 July 1954); also reprinted in ''Dialogue'' 12/2 (Summer 1979): 68–81.]

	This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on~~-line~~):		This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on the Church's official website):

	:''Not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine. A single statement made by a single leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well-considered, opinion, but is not meant to be officially binding for the whole Church. With divine inspiration, the First Presidency...and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles...counsel together to establish doctrine that is consistently proclaimed in official Church publications. This doctrine resides in the four “standard works” of scripture (the Holy Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price), official declarations and proclamations, and the Articles of Faith. Isolated statements are often taken out of context, leaving their original meaning distorted.''		:''Not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine. A single statement made by a single leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well-considered, opinion, but is not meant to be officially binding for the whole Church. With divine inspiration, the First Presidency...and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles...counsel together to establish doctrine that is consistently proclaimed in official Church publications. This doctrine resides in the four “standard works” of scripture (the Holy Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price), official declarations and proclamations, and the Articles of Faith. Isolated statements are often taken out of context, leaving their original meaning distorted.''

Cachemagic: /* The Church does not take an official position on this issue */

2008-12-02T15:45:40Z

The Church does not take an official position on this issue

← Vanhempi versio		Versio 2. joulukuuta 2008 kello 15.45
Rivi 13:		Rivi 13:
	This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on-line):		This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on-line):

	:''Not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine. A single statement made by a single leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well-considered, opinion, but is not meant to be officially binding for the whole Church. With divine inspiration, the First Presidency...and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles...counsel together to establish doctrine that is consistently proclaimed in official Church publications. This doctrine resides in the four “standard works” of scripture (the Holy Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price), official declarations and proclamations, and the Articles of Faith.''		:''Not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine. A single statement made by a single leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well-considered, opinion, but is not meant to be officially binding for the whole Church. With divine inspiration, the First Presidency...and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles...counsel together to establish doctrine that is consistently proclaimed in official Church publications. This doctrine resides in the four “standard works” of scripture (the Holy Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price), official declarations and proclamations, and the Articles of Faith. Isolated statements are often taken out of context, leaving their original meaning distorted.''
	:—LDS Newsroom, "Approaching Mormon Doctrine," ''lds.org'' (4 May 2007) {{link\|url=http://newsroom.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/commentary/approaching-mormon-doctrine}}]		:—LDS Newsroom, "Approaching Mormon Doctrine," ''lds.org'' (4 May 2007) {{link\|url=http://newsroom.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/commentary/approaching-mormon-doctrine}}]

	(''For further discussion of this principle see:'' FAIR wiki article: [[Fallibility_of_prophets\|Official Church doctrine and statements by Church leaders]].)		(''For further discussion of this principle see:'' FAIR wiki article: [[Fallibility_of_prophets\|Official Church doctrine and statements by Church leaders]].)