FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Array
Is the JST a restoration of lost Bible text: Difference between revisions
ReedComire (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Is the JST intended primarily or solely as a restoration of lost Bible text? == <small>Video published by BYU Religious Education.</small> <embedvideo service=youtube>bZmbsumMDR8</embedvideo>{{blankline}} The JST is not intended primarily or solely as a restoration of lost Bible text. As [https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bd/joseph-smith-translation?lang=eng expressed] in the Bible Dictionary on churchofjesuschrist.org "The JST '''''to some exten...") |
ReedComire (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Header}} | |||
<small>Video published by BYU Religious Education.</small> | <small>Video published by BYU Religious Education.</small> | ||
Revision as of 18:59, 25 October 2025
Is the JST a restoration of lost Bible text
Video published by BYU Religious Education.
The JST is not intended primarily or solely as a restoration of lost Bible text.
As expressed in the Bible Dictionary on churchofjesuschrist.org "The JST to some extent assists in restoring the plain and precious things that have been lost from the Bible."
Two main points should be kept in mind with regards to the Joseph Smith "translation" of the Bible:
- The JST is not intended primarily or solely as restoration of text. Many mainline LDS scholars who have focused on the JST (such as Robert J. Matthews and Kent Jackson) are unanimous in this regard. The assumption that it is intended primarily or solely as a restoration of text is what leads to expectations that the JST and Book of Mormon should match up in every case. At times the JST does not even match up with itself, such as when Joseph Smith translated the same passage multiple times in different ways. This does not undermine notions of revelation, but certainly challenges common assumptions about the nature and function of Joseph's understanding of "translation".
- One of the main tendencies of the JST is harmonization. Readers are well aware of differences in Jesus' sayings between different Gospels. For example, Jesus' statements about whether divorce is permitted and under what conditions differ significantly. Matthew offers an exception clause that Mark and Luke do not, and this has severely complicated the historical interpretation of Jesus' view of divorce.
- The JST often makes changes that harmonize one gospel with another. While one gospel says "judge not" (though this may not be as absolute as some make it out to be), John 7:24 has Jesus commanding to "judge righteous judgment." The JST change harmonizes the two gospels by making Matthew agree with John. If there is a real difference between being commanded to "Judge righteously" and being commanded to "Judge not", then it is a problem inherently present in the differing accounts of the Gospels, which the JST resolves.