Array

User:InProgress/SWDN/Swedish questions/11: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
*Why are there not any contemporary testimonies. Or are there?
*Why are there not any contemporary testimonies. Or are there?
|answer=
|answer=
*'''Question: Do contemporary accounts mention angelic visitors?<br>Answer: Yes.'''<br> {{nw}}
*'''Question: Is priesthood ordination mentioned? <br> Answer: Yes.'''<br> {{nw}}
*'''Question: Why are there not any contemporary testimonies. Or are there?<br> Answer: Yes, there are.''' See above.
}}
}}

Revision as of 02:57, 15 October 2013

A FairMormon Response to Questions Asked in Swedish Fireside with Elder's Jensen and Turley

1: BoM translation—2: Polygamy and Polyandry—3: Polygamy forced?—4: Book of Abraham—5: "Lying for Lord"—6: Mark Hofmann—7: Blood atonement—8: First Vision—9: Sanitized history—10: "Not all truth is useful"—11: Angelic affidavits—12: Blacks and priesthood—13: Temple concerns—14: Evidence of Vikings—15: Adam-God—16: Kinderhook

∗       ∗       ∗

Question:
One thing that really bothers me is the lack of contemporary sources for the angelic visitations.
  • There are sources from 1820-1830— affidavits, letters, minutes— but none of them ever mentions any angelic visitations or a priesthood
  • Why are there not any contemporary testimonies. Or are there?

Short Answer:
  • Question: Do contemporary accounts mention angelic visitors?
    Answer: Yes.

     [needs work]
  • Question: Is priesthood ordination mentioned?
    Answer: Yes.

     [needs work]
  • Question: Why are there not any contemporary testimonies. Or are there?
    Answer: Yes, there are.
    See above.