FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Array
User:InProgress/SWDN/Swedish questions/12: Difference between revisions
m (RogerNicholson moved page InProgress/SWDN/Swedish questions/12 to User:InProgress/SWDN/Swedish questions/12) |
(mod) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}} | {{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}} | ||
{{Resource Title| | {{Resource Title|Response to questions about the priesthood ban}} | ||
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader | |||
|title=[[../|Questions Asked at 2010 Swedish Fireside]] | |||
|author= | |||
|noauthor= | |||
|section= | |||
|previous=[[../11|Response to questions about angelic visitations]] | |||
|next=[[../13|Response to questions about temple concerns]] | |||
|notes= | |||
}} | |||
{{Swedish questions quick jump}} | {{Swedish questions quick jump}} | ||
Revision as of 19:34, 21 October 2013
Response to questions about the priesthood ban
| Response to questions about angelic visitations | A FAIR Analysis of:
Questions Asked at 2010 Swedish Fireside |
Response to questions about temple concerns |
1: BoM translation—2: Polygamy and Polyandry—3: Polygamy forced?—4: Book of Abraham—5: "Lying for Lord"—6: Mark Hofmann—7: Blood atonement—8: First Vision—9: Sanitized history—10: "Not all truth is useful"—11: Angelic affidavits—12: Blacks and priesthood—13: Temple concerns—14: Evidence of Vikings—15: Adam-God—16: Kinderhook
Question:
When I read about the priesthood and the blacks.
- David O. McKay .... he had made OK that they should have the priesthood. But three of the apostles were not there and when they come back, they said no.
- Is this true that there were some apostles that went against the question to give the priesthood to the Blacks?
- Mark E Peterson....talks a lot about the blacks and the pre-existence and they are damned and so on because they were black.
Short Answer:- Question: If David O. McKay was in favor of lifting the priesthood ban, why didn't he?
Answer: There is a period of studying it out in the mind prior to receiving revelation.
David O. McKay blacks and the priesthood. The June 1978 revelation has a history to it like all revelations. You have this period of time in which saints are studying it out in the mind and they eventually flower as revelation.
- —Elder Turley's response to this question at the Sweden fireside.
- Question: Why did some of the apostles disagree about lifting the priesthood ban?
Answer: We don't know.
It’s possible. I think it would be entirely consistent with the way things are done. Does that make sense?
- —Elder Turley's response to this question at the Sweden fireside.