Array

User:InProgress/SWDN/Swedish questions/11: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Head...")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Swedish questions quick jump}}
{{Swedish questions quick jump}}
{{parabreak}}
{{parabreak}}
==== ====
{{QuestionItem
|claim=One thing that really bothers me is the lack of contemporary sources for the angelic visitations.
*There are sources from 1820-1830— affidavits, letters, minutes— but none of them ever mentions any angelic visitations or a priesthood
*Why are there not any contemporary testimonies. Or are there?
|answer=
}}

Revision as of 05:13, 14 October 2013

A FairMormon Response to Questions Asked in Swedish Fireside with Elder's Jensen and Turley

1: BoM translation—2: Polygamy and Polyandry—3: Polygamy forced?—4: Book of Abraham—5: "Lying for Lord"—6: Mark Hofmann—7: Blood atonement—8: First Vision—9: Sanitized history—10: "Not all truth is useful"—11: Angelic affidavits—12: Blacks and priesthood—13: Temple concerns—14: Evidence of Vikings—15: Adam-God—16: Kinderhook

∗       ∗       ∗

Question:
One thing that really bothers me is the lack of contemporary sources for the angelic visitations.
  • There are sources from 1820-1830— affidavits, letters, minutes— but none of them ever mentions any angelic visitations or a priesthood
  • Why are there not any contemporary testimonies. Or are there?

Short Answer: