FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Criticism of Mormonism/Books/One Nation Under Gods/Use of sources/Stephen A. Douglas prophecy
< Criticism of Mormonism | Books | One Nation Under Gods | Use of sources
Revision as of 15:01, 7 December 2014 by RogerNicholson (talk | contribs)
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Contents
Timing of Stephen A. Douglas prophecy
Forged Rocky Mountain prophecy | A FAIR Analysis of: One Nation Under Gods A work by author: Richard Abanes
|
Most accurate history in all the world |
Author's Claims
One Nation under Gods, page 406 (hardback and paperback)
- One of the "forged predictions" added to the history was "about the political career of Senator Steven (sic) A. Douglas." - (Note: Should be "Stephen" A. Douglas)
Author's Sources
Endnote 23, page 608 (hardback); page 606 (paperback)
- History of the Church, vol. 5, 85, 393-394, 398.
Answer
The claim is frankly false. As B.H. Roberts' editorial remark in the History of the Church noted:
There is, and can be no question about the prophecy preceding the event. The prophecy was first published in the Deseret News of September 24, 1856. It was afterwards published in England in the Millennial Star, February, 1859. The publication in the Deseret News preceding Douglas' Springfield speech, mentioned above, (June, 1857) by about one year, and about four years before Douglas was nominated for the presidency by the Charleston Democratic convention.[1]
This paper is available in digital form on-line. Screenshots are included in this article.
Notes
- ↑ History of the Church, 5:393. Volume 5 link The History of the Church notes that the original source was taken "from the journal of William Clayton, who was present," though the prophecy against Douglas is in not the published portions of Clayton's journals (See Cecelia Warner, “The Tanners On Trial,” Sunstone: Review 4:4/6 (April 1984); Lawrence Foster, “Career Apostates: Reflections on the Works of Jerald and Sandra Tanner,” Dialogue 17/2 (Summer 1984): 48 and n. 28; James B. Allen, review of An Intimate Chronicle: The Journals of William Clayton, by George D. Smith, ed., BYU Studies 35/2 (1995): 165–75). It is not known if more material is in the Clayton journals that served as a basis for the complete History of the Church entry. At any rate, the publication of the prophecy before June 1857 makes the point moot—the Church was claiming this as a prophecy well before it was fulfilled, and had no reasons before then to attack Douglas if the prophecy was unauthentic.