|
Of these nine accounts of the First Vision, four are very clearly accounts of the later visit of the angel Moroni (the first three mentioned, and the 1834 account). They do not belong in a list of "First Vision" accounts, and represent either extremely sloppy research or a deliberate attempt to deceive.
Of the other five accounts
- 1838 was the one eventually canonized in the Pearl of Great Price;
- 1835 [interview with Joshua, November 9; MS 15 (1853): 396]; and 1844 [presumably the book by I. Daniel Rupp] both refer to “two personages”
We need to ask why the video has ignored:
- the 1843 letter from Joseph Smith to the editor of the Pittsburgh Gazette, which refers to the Father and Son;
- the Wentworth letter, written by Joseph Smith, and published in his lifetime, which also refers to two unidentified personages
- the Neibaur diary account of a sermon delivered by Joseph Smith in 1844, which also refers to two personages?
Hence, of the eight accounts which actually refer to the First Vision, two refer to the Father and the Son specifically; four others refer simply to “two personages.”
This leaves
- the 1832 account, which is a rough draft which uses the same structure as Paul's vision of Christ. The Father is not named specifically, but His words and witness are clearly present. [[{{{url}}}|FAIRWiki link]]
There is also extensive evidence that Joseph Smith was teaching about two members of the Godhead at a very early date. FAIRWiki link
Through false information, distortion, and refusing to let the documents speak for themselves, the video attempts to manufacture a problem where none exists.
To read more:
|
