Difference between revisions of "Detailed response to CES Letter, Book of Abraham"

("the sun gets its light from Kolob": m)
(: m)
Line 193: Line 193:
 
|claim=The author states, "One of the most disturbing facts I discovered in my research of Facsimile 2 is figure #7.  Joseph Smith said that this is “God sitting on his throne…”  It’s actually Min, the pagan Egyptian god of fertility or sex.  Min is sitting on a throne with an erect penis (which can be seen in the figure).  In other words, Joseph Smith is saying that this figure with an erect penis is Heavenly Father sitting on his throne."
 
|claim=The author states, "One of the most disturbing facts I discovered in my research of Facsimile 2 is figure #7.  Joseph Smith said that this is “God sitting on his throne…”  It’s actually Min, the pagan Egyptian god of fertility or sex.  Min is sitting on a throne with an erect penis (which can be seen in the figure).  In other words, Joseph Smith is saying that this figure with an erect penis is Heavenly Father sitting on his throne."
 
|answer=
 
|answer=
*{{Answer}}The Egyptians had multiple gods, each representing a particular characteristic. Latter-day Saints, (and Christians in general), on the other hand, worship one God, who encompasses all characteristics. Thus, Joseph could have identified ''any'' Egyptian god in Facsimile 2 as "God, sitting on his throne," not just Min. He does, in fact, also identify the hawk-headed god Re in the exact same manner. The is no Egyptian representation of the God that we know as "God the Father."
 
*With regard to the nudity (and the phallus in particular), the Egyptians had no cultural reservations about depicting nudity, unlike our current society. Therefore, the depiction of Min and his phallus is used by critics to create an absurdity: that Joseph would dare to associate such a figure with God the Father. To ancient Egyptians, however, there would have been no absurdity in doing so. Joseph simply equated both the god Re and the god Min with "God sitting on his throne."
 
*References in the figure below are to Michael D. Rhodes, "The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus . . . Twenty Years Later." {{link|url=http://home.comcast.net/~michael.rhodes/JosephSmithHypocephalus.pdf}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
[[File:Mormoninfographic.min.the.ithyphallic.god.jpg|900 px]]
+
{{:Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Facsimiles/Facsimile 2/Identification of the ithyphallic Egyptian god "Min" as "God sitting upon his throne"}}
 
<!--
 
<!--
 
==== ====
 
==== ====

Revision as of 20:31, 5 May 2014

FAIR Answers—back to home page

Response to "Book of Abraham Concerns & Questions"


A FAIR Analysis of:
[[../|Letter to a CES Director]]


The Book of Abraham. An inspired translation of the writings of Abraham. Joseph Smith began the translation in 1835 after obtaining some Egyptian papyri. The translation was published serially in the Times and Seasons beginning March 1, 1842, at Nauvoo, Illinois.
—Introduction, Pearl of Great Price (2013 edition). off-site
∗       ∗       ∗

Quick Navigation

Response Section

"scholars have found the original papyrus Joseph translated and have dated it in first century AD, nearly 2,000 years after Abraham could have written it"

Template:CESLetterItem

"It has absolutely nothing to do with Abraham or anything Joseph claimed in his translation for the Book of Abraham"

Template:CESLetterItem IE Jan1968 cover.jpg Egyptian.papyri.rediscovered.funeral.documents.improvement.era.jan.1968.p12.jpg

Facsimile 1

Template:CESLetterItem Lion.couch.scene.with.abrahams.name.Leiden.Papyrus.I.384.jpg

"The following image is what Facsimile 1 is really supposed to look like"

The Charles Larson restoration of Facsimile 1

Template:CESLetterItem Comparison of high resolution image of the Joseph Smith papyrus with Charles Larson restoration - detail of the "hand versus wing". Rotation and comparison of the existing bird wing with the disputed section of the papyrus

Template:CESLetterItem Comparison of high resolution image of the Joseph Smith papyrus with Charles Larson restoration - kilt detail

Template:CESLetterItem Larson.restoration.anubis.2.jpg

Template:CESLetterItem Mummy.fac.1.comparison.jpg Lion couch scene at the louvre.jpg

Facsimile 2

Template:CESLetterItem Hypocephalus.split.3D.1.jpg Hawk-headed.god.Re.in.Joseph.Smith.Papyri.jpg

Facsimile 3

Template:CESLetterItem

Facsimile3.jpg

Template:CESLetterItem Mormoninfographic.facsimile2.sons.of.horus.jpg

Template:CESLetterItem

Joseph Smith identified the ithyphallic Egyptian god "Min" as representing "God sitting upon his throne"


Jump to details:


"the sun gets its light from Kolob"

Template:CESLetterItem

"There’s a book published in 1830 by Thomas Dick entitled 'The Philosophy of the Future State'"

Template:CESLetterItem

"Elder Jeffrey R. Holland was directly asked about the papyri not matching the Book of Abraham in a March 2012 BBC interview"

Template:CESLetterItem

== Notes ==

  1. [note]  Hugh Nibley, An Approach to the Book of Abraham, edited by John Gee, Vol. 18 in the Collected Works of Hugh Nibley (Salt Lake City and Provo, Utah: Deseret Book / FARMS, 2009), 546. ISBN 1606410547.
  2. [note]  Michael Ash, “Book of Abraham 201: Papyri, Revelation, and Modern Egyptology”, presented at the 2006 FAIR Conference. FAIR link (Accessed 29 August, 2009).
  3. [note] Robert K. Ritner, “The Breathing Permit of Hor Among the Joseph Smith Papyri," Journal of Near Eastern Studies, (University of Chicago, 2003), p. 162, note 4. Dr. Ritner is one of Dr. John Gee's former professors at Yale. Ritner's article in the Journal of Near eastern Studies is highly critical of his former student's involvement with any LDS apologetic effort on the part of the Book of Abraham, specifically because he was not included in a peer review.
  4. [note] Larry E. Morris, "The Book of Abraham: Ask the Right Questions and Keep On Looking (Review of: “The ‘Breathing Permit of Hor’ Thirty-four Years Later.” Dialogue 33/4 (2000): 97–119)," FARMS Review 16/2 (2004): 355–380. off-site
  5. [note] Larry E. Morris, "The Book of Abraham: Ask the Right Questions and Keep On Looking (Review of: “The ‘Breathing Permit of Hor’ Thirty-four Years Later.” Dialogue 33/4 (2000): 97–119)," FARMS Review 16/2 (2004): 355–380. off-site