FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Question: Was the practice of polygamy against the law in Illinois in the 1840s?"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{ | + | {{Articles FAIR copyright}} |
| − | + | <onlyinclude> | |
| − | + | {{SummaryHeader | |
| − | + | |link=Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal in Nauvoo | |
| − | + | |subject=Was the practice of polygamy against the law in Illinois in the 1840s? | |
| − | + | |summary= | |
| − | + | |sublink1=M. Scott Bradshaw: "Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844" | |
| − | + | |sublink2=Question: Was Joseph Smith ever charged with adultery under Illinois law? | |
| + | |sublink3=Question: Were there any similar cases under Illinois adultery statute which demonstrate that Joseph was not breaking the law? | ||
| + | |sublink4=Question: Why did Joseph Smith say "I had not been married scarcely five minutes...before it was reported that I had seven wives"? | ||
| + | |sublink5=Question: Was there ever a consummation of the sealing between Maria Lawrence and Joseph Smith? | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | </onlyinclude> | ||
{{Epigraph|Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844. Illinois law only criminalized adultery or fornication if it was "open". Had Joseph lived to face trial on this charge, he would have had good reason to expect acquittal because his relationships with his plural wives were not open, but were kept confidential and known by a relative few. Given a fair trial on this indictment, Joseph could have relied on several legal defenses.<br> | {{Epigraph|Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844. Illinois law only criminalized adultery or fornication if it was "open". Had Joseph lived to face trial on this charge, he would have had good reason to expect acquittal because his relationships with his plural wives were not open, but were kept confidential and known by a relative few. Given a fair trial on this indictment, Joseph could have relied on several legal defenses.<br> | ||
:::::— M. Scott Bradshaw<ref name="defining">{{Article:Bradshaw:Defining Adultery/Full title|pages=}}</ref>{{Rp|402}}}} | :::::— M. Scott Bradshaw<ref name="defining">{{Article:Bradshaw:Defining Adultery/Full title|pages=}}</ref>{{Rp|402}}}} | ||
{{parabreak}} | {{parabreak}} | ||
| − | + | ||
{{:Source:Madsen:Defining Adultery:Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844}} | {{:Source:Madsen:Defining Adultery:Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844}} | ||
{{:Question: Was Joseph Smith ever charged with adultery under Illinois law?}} | {{:Question: Was Joseph Smith ever charged with adultery under Illinois law?}} | ||
| Line 16: | Line 21: | ||
{{:Question: Why did Joseph Smith say "I had not been married scarcely five minutes...before it was reported that I had seven wives"?}} | {{:Question: Why did Joseph Smith say "I had not been married scarcely five minutes...before it was reported that I had seven wives"?}} | ||
{{:Question: Was there ever a consummation of the sealing between Maria Lawrence and Joseph Smith?}} | {{:Question: Was there ever a consummation of the sealing between Maria Lawrence and Joseph Smith?}} | ||
| − | + | ||
{{endnotes sources}} | {{endnotes sources}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
[[de:Joseph Smith und Polygamie/illegal]] | [[de:Joseph Smith und Polygamie/illegal]] | ||
[[en:Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal/Illegal in Nauvoo]] | [[en:Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal/Illegal in Nauvoo]] | ||
Revision as of 17:07, 21 May 2017
FAIR Answers—back to home page
Was the practice of polygamy against the law in Illinois in the 1840s?
Jump to Subtopic:
- M. Scott Bradshaw: "Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844"
- Question: Was Joseph Smith ever charged with adultery under Illinois law?
- Question: Were there any similar cases under Illinois adultery statute which demonstrate that Joseph was not breaking the law?
- Question: Why did Joseph Smith say "I had not been married scarcely five minutes...before it was reported that I had seven wives"?
- Question: Was there ever a consummation of the sealing between Maria Lawrence and Joseph Smith?
Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844. Illinois law only criminalized adultery or fornication if it was "open". Had Joseph lived to face trial on this charge, he would have had good reason to expect acquittal because his relationships with his plural wives were not open, but were kept confidential and known by a relative few. Given a fair trial on this indictment, Joseph could have relied on several legal defenses.
- — M. Scott Bradshaw[1]:402
M. Scott Bradshaw: "Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844"
M. Scott Bradshaw:
Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844. Illinois law only criminalized adultery or fornication if it was "open". Had Joseph lived to face trial on this charge, he would have had good reason to expect acquittal because his relationships with his plural wives were not open, but were kept confidential and known by a relative few. Given a fair trial on this indictment, Joseph could have relied on several legal defenses.[1]:402
Question: Was Joseph Smith ever charged with adultery under Illinois law?
Jump to details:
- Question: Was Joseph Smith ever charged with adultery under Illinois law?
- William and Wilson Law charged Joseph with adultery in the case of Maria Lawrence
- Illinois law only criminalized adultery or fornication if it was "open"
- Joseph's relationships with his plural wives did not meet this definition
Question: Were there any similar cases under Illinois adultery statute which demonstrate that Joseph was not breaking the law?
Jump to details:
- Question: Were there any similar cases under Illinois adultery statute which demonstrate that Joseph was not breaking the law?
- Two cases decided after Joseph's death demonstrate that there was nothing which would have permitted conviction
- If Joseph been charged by his wife Emma with adultery, this could have served as grounds for divorce under Illinois law
- It was later realized that Illinois law would probably support the practice of Latter-day Saint plural marriage, so they changed the wording of the law
Question: Why did Joseph Smith say "I had not been married scarcely five minutes...before it was reported that I had seven wives"?
Jump to details:
- Question: Why did Joseph Smith say "I had not been married scarcely five minutes...before it was reported that I had seven wives"?
- The Laws sought to have Joseph indicted for adultery and perjury
- Joseph was refuting the charge of adultery, not the fact that he had "seven wives"
- Joseph was not merely bluffing, nor was he lying—he literally could prove that the Laws were perjuring themselves on this point
Question: Was there ever a consummation of the sealing between Maria Lawrence and Joseph Smith?
Jump to details:
- Question: Was there ever a consummation of the sealing between Maria Lawrence and Joseph Smith?
- Although under law, Joseph Smith and Maria Lawrence were not guilty of adultery, this does not mean that they had not consummated their plural marriage
Notes