Difference between revisions of "Question: Was the practice of polygamy against the law in Illinois in the 1840s?"

Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Quick Navigation==
 
==Quick Navigation==
 
*[[Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal in Nauvoo#M. Scott Bradshaw: "Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844"|M. Scott Bradshaw: "Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844"]]
 
*[[Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal in Nauvoo#M. Scott Bradshaw: "Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844"|M. Scott Bradshaw: "Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844"]]
{{:Question: Was Joseph Smith ever charged with adultery under Illinois law?}}
+
*[[Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal in Nauvoo#Question: Was Joseph Smith ever charged with adultery under Illinois law?|Question: Was Joseph Smith ever charged with adultery under Illinois law?]]
{{:Question: Were there any similar cases under Illinois adultery statute which demonstrate that Joseph was not breaking the law?}}
+
*[[Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal in Nauvoo#Question: Were there any similar cases under Illinois adultery statute which demonstrate that Joseph was not breaking the law?|Question: Were there any similar cases under Illinois adultery statute which demonstrate that Joseph was not breaking the law?]]
{{:Question: Why did Joseph Smith say "I had not been married scarcely five minutes...before it was reported that I had seven wives"?}}
+
*[[Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal in Nauvoo#Question: Why did Joseph Smith say "I had not been married scarcely five minutes...before it was reported that I had seven wives"?|Question: Why did Joseph Smith say "I had not been married scarcely five minutes...before it was reported that I had seven wives"?]]
{{:Question: Was there ever a consummation of the sealing between Maria Lawrence and Joseph Smith?
+
*[[Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal in Nauvoo#Question: Was there ever a consummation of the sealing between Maria Lawrence and Joseph Smith?|Question: Was there ever a consummation of the sealing between Maria Lawrence and Joseph Smith?]]
 
{{Epigraph|Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844. Illinois law only criminalized adultery or fornication if it was "open". Had Joseph lived to face trial on this charge, he would have had good reason to expect acquittal because his relationships with his plural wives were not open, but were kept confidential and known by a relative few. Given a fair trial on this indictment, Joseph could have relied on several legal defenses.<br>
 
{{Epigraph|Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844. Illinois law only criminalized adultery or fornication if it was "open". Had Joseph lived to face trial on this charge, he would have had good reason to expect acquittal because his relationships with his plural wives were not open, but were kept confidential and known by a relative few. Given a fair trial on this indictment, Joseph could have relied on several legal defenses.<br>
 
:::::&mdash; M. Scott Bradshaw<ref name="defining">{{Article:Bradshaw:Defining Adultery/Full title|pages=}}</ref>{{Rp|402}}}}
 
:::::&mdash; M. Scott Bradshaw<ref name="defining">{{Article:Bradshaw:Defining Adultery/Full title|pages=}}</ref>{{Rp|402}}}}

Revision as of 20:09, 17 April 2017

FAIR Answers—back to home page

Was the practice of polygamy against the law in Illinois in the 1840s?

Quick Navigation

Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844. Illinois law only criminalized adultery or fornication if it was "open". Had Joseph lived to face trial on this charge, he would have had good reason to expect acquittal because his relationships with his plural wives were not open, but were kept confidential and known by a relative few. Given a fair trial on this indictment, Joseph could have relied on several legal defenses.
— M. Scott Bradshaw[1]:402
∗       ∗       ∗


M. Scott Bradshaw: "Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844"

M. Scott Bradshaw:

Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844. Illinois law only criminalized adultery or fornication if it was "open". Had Joseph lived to face trial on this charge, he would have had good reason to expect acquittal because his relationships with his plural wives were not open, but were kept confidential and known by a relative few. Given a fair trial on this indictment, Joseph could have relied on several legal defenses.[1]:402


Question: Was Joseph Smith ever charged with adultery under Illinois law?


Jump to details:


Question: Were there any similar cases under Illinois adultery statute which demonstrate that Joseph was not breaking the law?


Jump to details:


Question: Why did Joseph Smith say "I had not been married scarcely five minutes...before it was reported that I had seven wives"?


Jump to details:


Question: Was there ever a consummation of the sealing between Maria Lawrence and Joseph Smith?


Jump to details:


Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 M. Scott Bradshaw, "Defining Adultery under Illinois and Nauvoo Law," in Sustaining the Law: Joseph Smith's Legal Encounters, edited by Gordon A. Madsen, Jeffrey N. Walker, and John W. Welch (Provo, Utah: BYU Studies, 2014), 401–426.