FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Polyandry"
< Joseph Smith | Polygamy
m |
m (Bot, replaced: {{Navigation plural marriage}} → {{Navigation:Plural marriage}}) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FairMormon}} | {{FairMormon}} | ||
− | <noinclude>{{Navigation | + | <noinclude>{{Navigation:Plural marriage}}</noinclude> |
{{BH | {{BH | ||
|L=../Polyandry | |L=../Polyandry | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
[[es:Libro de la poligamia/Poliandria]] | [[es:Libro de la poligamia/Poliandria]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==References== | ||
+ | {{Reflist}} |
Revision as of 13:25, 12 April 2024
FAIR Answers—back to home page
Polyandry: Women married to more than one husband
Children of polygamous marriages | John C. Bennett |
Polyandry: Women married to more than one husband
Jump to details:
Perhaps nothing is less understood than Joseph Smith's sealings to women already married, because the evidence supports conflicting interpretations.
—Kathryn M. Daynes[1]
Joseph Smith's "polyandrous" sealings or plural marriages?
Jump to details:
- Question: What do we know about Joseph Smith's "polyandrous" sealings or plural marriages?
- The doctrine of sealing and adoption
- Evaluating each polyandrous marriage
- Group 1: Women with non-member spouses
- Observations about the first group
- Group 2: Women with non-faithful LDS spouses
- Observations about the second group
- Group 3: Women with faithful LDS spouses
- Observations about the third group
- Group 4: Women likely separated/divorced from their first husbands (i.e., pseudopolyandry)
- A hypothesis—why so many early polyandrous marriages?
- Further evidence against sexual polyandry
- Nauvoo witnesses did not try to justify sexual polyandry
- Nauvoo detractors likewise say nothing about sexual polyandry
- Evidence from the "Temple Lot" case of non-consummation of polyandrous marriages
- Would polyandrous testimony have been harmful to the Church, and so avoided?
- Conclusion