Difference between revisions of "Mormon responses to atheism"

Line 7: Line 7:
 
|subject=Subjective revelation
 
|subject=Subjective revelation
 
|summary=Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie."
 
|summary=Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie."
 +
|sublink1=Question: Is a "burning in the bosom" simply a subjective, emotion-based, unreliable way to practice self-deception?
 +
|sublink2=Question: Why do critics of Mormonism who belong to other religions discount spiritual experiences?
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem

Revision as of 16:19, 14 April 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Mormon responses to atheism


Subjective revelation

Summary: Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie."

Atheism



Further reading and additional sources responding to these claims