FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Prescindia Lathrop Huntington Buell"
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-josephsmithspolygamy.org/history-2 +josephsmithspolygamy.org)) |
m |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Main Page}} |
| − | + | {{Navigation:Joseph Smith}} | |
| − | {{ | + | {{Navigation:Plural marriage}} |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | {{Header}} | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | '''Prescindia Lathrop Huntington Buell''' and her husband Norman joined the Church in 1836. By 1839, Norman had left the Church, and Prescindia noted that "the Lord gave me strength to Stand alone & keep the faith amid heavy persecution.” “[I]n 1841 I entered into the New Everlasting Covenant," said Prescindia, "[I] was sealed to Joseph Smith the Prophet and Seer, and to the best of my ability I have honored plural marriage, never speaking one word against the principle… Never in my life, in this kingdom, which is 44 years, have I doubted the truth of this great work.” | |
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{H2 | {{H2 | ||
| − | |L= | + | |L=Joseph_Smith_and_children_through_plural_marriage#Ruled_out_by_DNA_Evidence:_Oliver_Buell.2C_Mosiah_Hancock.2C_John_Reed_Hancock.2C_Zebulon_Jacobs.2C_Moroni_Llewllyn_Pratt.2C_and_Orrison_Smith |
| − | |H= | + | |H=Children of Joseph Smith ruled out by DNA Evidence: Oliver Buell |
|S=Prescindia Lathrop Huntington Buell and her husband Norman joined the Church in 1836. By 1839, Norman had left the Church, and Prescindia noted that "the Lord gave me strength to Stand alone & keep the faith amid heavy persecution. | |S=Prescindia Lathrop Huntington Buell and her husband Norman joined the Church in 1836. By 1839, Norman had left the Church, and Prescindia noted that "the Lord gave me strength to Stand alone & keep the faith amid heavy persecution. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{H2 | {{H2 | ||
| − | |L= | + | |L=Joseph_Smith_and_children_through_plural_marriage#John_Hyrum_Buell.2C_Son_of_Prescinda_Huntington_Buell |
| − | |H= | + | |H=John Hyrum Buell, an unlikely child |
|S=The case of Oliver Buell is an interesting one, since author Fawn Brodie was insistent that he was Joseph's son. She based part of this argument on a photograph of Buell, which revealed a face which she claimed was "overwhelmingly on the side of Joseph's paternity." Oliver's potential relationship to Joseph, however, has been ruled out by DNA evidence. | |S=The case of Oliver Buell is an interesting one, since author Fawn Brodie was insistent that he was Joseph's son. She based part of this argument on a photograph of Buell, which revealed a face which she claimed was "overwhelmingly on the side of Joseph's paternity." Oliver's potential relationship to Joseph, however, has been ruled out by DNA evidence. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{H2 |
| + | |L=Joseph_Smith_and_children_through_plural_marriage#Did_Prescindia_Buell_.28or_Sarah_Pratt.2C_or_Mrs._Hyde.29_not_know_who_was_the_father_of_her_son.3F | ||
| + | |H=Did Prescindia Buell not know who was the father of her son? | ||
| + | |S=The case of Oliver Buell is an interesting one, since author Fawn Brodie was insistent that he was Joseph's son. She based part of this argument on a photograph of Buell, which revealed a face which she claimed was "overwhelmingly on the side of Joseph's paternity." Oliver's potential relationship to Joseph, however, has been ruled out by DNA evidence. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| − | |||
{{HalesItem | {{HalesItem | ||
|subject=Joseph Smith’s Pre-Nauvoo Reputation--Presendia Huntington Buell | |subject=Joseph Smith’s Pre-Nauvoo Reputation--Presendia Huntington Buell | ||
| Line 34: | Line 31: | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
{{HalesItem | {{HalesItem | ||
|subject=Were There Other Polygamous Marriages Prior to Nauvoo?—Presendia Huntington Buell | |subject=Were There Other Polygamous Marriages Prior to Nauvoo?—Presendia Huntington Buell | ||
|link=http://josephsmithspolygamy.org/kirtland-polygamy/ | |link=http://josephsmithspolygamy.org/kirtland-polygamy/ | ||
|summary=}} | |summary=}} | ||
| − | + | ||
{{HalesItem | {{HalesItem | ||
|subject=After Louisa Beaman, Joseph Smith Seeks Almost Exclusively “Eternity Only” Sealings | |subject=After Louisa Beaman, Joseph Smith Seeks Almost Exclusively “Eternity Only” Sealings | ||
| Line 45: | Line 41: | ||
|summary=}} | |summary=}} | ||
</onlyinclude> | </onlyinclude> | ||
| − | |||
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:27, 18 May 2024
Life and Character |
|
Revelations and the Church |
|
Prophetic Statements |
|
Society |
|
Plural marriage (polygamy) |
|
Death |
Prescindia Lathrop Huntington Buell
Prescindia Lathrop Huntington Buell and her husband Norman joined the Church in 1836. By 1839, Norman had left the Church, and Prescindia noted that "the Lord gave me strength to Stand alone & keep the faith amid heavy persecution.” “[I]n 1841 I entered into the New Everlasting Covenant," said Prescindia, "[I] was sealed to Joseph Smith the Prophet and Seer, and to the best of my ability I have honored plural marriage, never speaking one word against the principle… Never in my life, in this kingdom, which is 44 years, have I doubted the truth of this great work.”
Children of Joseph Smith ruled out by DNA Evidence: Oliver Buell
Summary: Prescindia Lathrop Huntington Buell and her husband Norman joined the Church in 1836. By 1839, Norman had left the Church, and Prescindia noted that "the Lord gave me strength to Stand alone & keep the faith amid heavy persecution.
John Hyrum Buell, an unlikely child
Summary: The case of Oliver Buell is an interesting one, since author Fawn Brodie was insistent that he was Joseph's son. She based part of this argument on a photograph of Buell, which revealed a face which she claimed was "overwhelmingly on the side of Joseph's paternity." Oliver's potential relationship to Joseph, however, has been ruled out by DNA evidence.
Did Prescindia Buell not know who was the father of her son?
Summary: The case of Oliver Buell is an interesting one, since author Fawn Brodie was insistent that he was Joseph's son. She based part of this argument on a photograph of Buell, which revealed a face which she claimed was "overwhelmingly on the side of Joseph's paternity." Oliver's potential relationship to Joseph, however, has been ruled out by DNA evidence.
Joseph Smith's Polygamy: "Joseph Smith’s Pre-Nauvoo Reputation--Presendia Huntington Buell", by Brian C. Hales
Joseph Smith's Polygamy: "Were There Other Polygamous Marriages Prior to Nauvoo?—Presendia Huntington Buell", by Brian C. Hales
Joseph Smith's Polygamy: "After Louisa Beaman, Joseph Smith Seeks Almost Exclusively “Eternity Only” Sealings", by Brian C. Hales