Difference between revisions of "Question: Since first wives were generally to grant permission for sealings to subsequent wives, did Joseph's later sealing to Emma mean that Emma no longer held the role of "first wife"?"

m (→‎top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}})
m
Line 10: Line 10:
 
{{Emma polygamy Hales site links}}
 
{{Emma polygamy Hales site links}}
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>
−
{{CriticalSources}}
+
 
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->

Revision as of 21:47, 28 April 2024


Question: Since first wives were generally to grant permission for sealings to subsequent wives, did Joseph's later sealing to Emma mean that Emma no longer held the role of "first wife"?

If the wife of the person who holds the keys to plural marriage rejects plural marriage, her husband is to follow the commands of God to him without her permission

Joseph's revelation in D&C 132 explicitly states that if the wife of the person who holds the keys to plural marriage rejects plural marriage, her husband is to follow the commands of God to him without her permission.

Main article: Hiding plural marriage from Emma, and the Law of Sarah
See also Brian Hales' discussion
Sometime in 1840 Joseph Smith first broached the topic of plural marriage privately to trusted friends. Most of the apostles were in England and thus were unavailable for an introduction to the practice.
Joseph's first foray into plural marriage was deeply painful for Emma, his first wife.
It is impossible to definitively determine when Emma learned of Joseph’s plural marriages. However, many historical clues help to create a possible timeline.
The earliest documentable date for Emma’s awareness of time-and-eternity plural marriage is May of 1843, when she participated in four of her husband’s polygamous sealings.
Emma’s resistance to plural marriage prompted Hyrum to encourage Joseph to dictate a written revelation on the subject.
Rather than generating Emma’s active support, the revelation [D&C 132] appears to have brought a smoldering crisis to flame. She and Joseph took serious counsel together with some sort of agreement being negotiated.


Notes

Retrieved from "https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php?title=Question:_Since_first_wives_were_generally_to_grant_permission_for_sealings_to_subsequent_wives%2C_did_Joseph%27s_later_sealing_to_Emma_mean_that_Emma_no_longer_held_the_role_of_%22first_wife%22%3F&oldid=253600"