View source for Question: Why did the 1835 Doctrine and Covenants include a statement of marriage that denied the practice of polygamy at a time when some were actually practicing it?

{{Main Page}}

<onlyinclude>
{{H2
|L=Question: Why did the 1835 Doctrine and Covenants include a statement of marriage that denied the practice of polygamy at a time when some were actually practicing it?
|H=Question: Why did the 1835 Doctrine and Covenants include a statement of marriage that denied the practice of polygamy at a time when some were actually practicing it?
|S=
|L1=Question: Why did the 1835 Doctrine and Covenants include a statement of marriage that denied the practice of polygamy at a time when some were actually practicing it?
|L2=Polygamy was not being taught to the general Church membership at that time
|L3=The statement itself was not changed between the 1835 and 1844 editions of the D&C
|L4=The available evidence suggests that Joseph Smith supported its publication
|L5=The statement was not a revelation given to Joseph Smith - it was written by Oliver Cowdery
}}
</onlyinclude>


==Question: Why did the 1835 Doctrine and Covenants include a statement of marriage that denied the practice of polygamy at a time when some were actually practicing it?==
===Polygamy was not being taught to the general Church membership at that time===

The Article on Marriage was printed in the 1835 D&C as section 101 and in the 1844 D&C as section 109. The portion of the Article on Marriage relevant to polygamy states:

<blockquote>
Inasmuch as this church of Christ has been reproached with the crime of fornication, and polygamy: we declare that we believe, that one man should have one wife; and one woman, but one husband, except in case of death, when either is at liberty to marry again. <ref>Doctrine and Covenants, 1835 edition, Section 101.</ref>
</blockquote>
This was true&mdash;the Church membership generally was not being taught plural marriage, and were not living it at that time.

===The statement itself was not changed between the 1835 and 1844 editions of the D&C===

In fact, the statement remained in the D&C until the 1876 edition, even though plural marriage had been taught to specific individuals since at least 1831, practiced in secret since 1836, and practiced openly since 1852. The matter of not removing it in 1852 was simply due to the fact that a new edition of the D&C was not published until 1876.

===The available evidence suggests that Joseph Smith supported its publication===

While some have suggested that the article was published against Joseph's wishes or without his knowledge, the available evidence suggests that he supported its publication. It was likely included to counter the perception that the Mormon's practice of communal property (the "law of consecration") included a community of wives.

===The statement was not a revelation given to Joseph Smith - it was written by Oliver Cowdery===

This statement was not a revelation given to Joseph Smith&mdash;it was written by Oliver Cowdery and introduced to a conference of the priesthood at Kirtland on 17 August 1835. Cowdery also wrote a statement of belief on government that has been retained in our current edition of the D&C as section 134. Both were sustained at the conference and included in the 1835 D&C, which was already at the press and ready to be published. Joseph Smith was preaching in Michigan at the time Oliver and W.W. Phelps introduced these two articles to the conference; it is not known if he approved of their addition to the D&C at the time, although he did retain them in the 1844 Nauvoo edition, which argues that he was not opposed to them. (Phelps read the article on marriage, while Cowdery read the one on government.) <ref>{{HC1|vol=2|pages=246&ndash;247}}</ref>

Some have suggested that the manner in which the conference was called suggests that Joseph was not the instigator of it, since it seems to have been done quite quickly, with relatively few high church leaders in attendance:

<blockquote>
The General Assembly, which may have been announced on only twenty-four hours' notice, was held Monday, August 17[, 1835]. Its spur-of-the-moment nature is demonstrated by observing that a puzzling majority of Church leaders were absent. Missing from the meeting were all of the Twelve Apostles, eight of the twelve Kirtland High Council members nine of the twelve Missouri High Council members, three of the seven Presidents of the Quorum of Seventy, Presiding Bishop Partridge, and...two of the three members of the First Presidency. <ref>{{Book:Hales:JS Polygamy 1/Full title|pages=154}}</ref>
</blockquote>

However, there is also some evidence that an article on marriage was already anticipated, and cited four times in the new D&C's index, which was prepared under Joseph's direction and probably available prior to his departure. Thus, "if a disagreement existed, it was resolved before the Prophet left for Pontiac." <ref>{{Book:Hales:JS Polygamy 1|pages=173, see pp. 171&ndash;1731 for full details}}</ref>

{{endnotes sources}}
[[Category:Becoming Gods]]
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
[[Category:Mormonism 101]]
[[Category:Mormon America: The Power and the Promise]]
[[Category:MormonThink]]
[[Category:No Man Knows My History]]
[[Category:One Nation Under Gods]]
[[Category:The Changing World of Mormonism]]

<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->

[[es:Pregunta: ¿Por qué el 1835 de Doctrina y Convenios incluyen una declaración de matrimonio que negó la práctica de la poligamia en momentos en que algunos estaban realmente practicarlo?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: Por que a edição de 1835 de Doutrina e Convênios incui uma declaração de casamento que negava a prática da poligamia em uma época onde havia na verdade alguns praticando?]]
[[Category:Questions]]