Difference between revisions of "Question: Why would Joseph Smith use a non-religious vehicle for presenting a temple ordinance?"

m (top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}})
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FME-Source
+
{{Main Page}}
|title=Question: Why would Joseph Smith use a non-religious vehicle for presenting a temple ordinance?
 
|category=Temples/Freemasonry
 
}}
 
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
 
==Question: Why would Joseph Smith use a non-religious vehicle for presenting a temple ordinance?==
 
==Question: Why would Joseph Smith use a non-religious vehicle for presenting a temple ordinance?==
Line 13: Line 10:
  
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
[[en:Question: Why would Joseph Smith use a non-religious vehicle for presenting a temple ordinance?]]
+
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
 +
 
 
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Por qué José Smith utilizaría un vehículo no religiosa para la presentación de una ordenanza del templo?]]
 
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Por qué José Smith utilizaría un vehículo no religiosa para la presentación de una ordenanza del templo?]]
 
[[pt:Pergunta: Por que Joseph utilizaria um meio não religioso para apresentar uma ordenança do templo?]]
 
[[pt:Pergunta: Por que Joseph utilizaria um meio não religioso para apresentar uma ordenança do templo?]]
 
+
[[Category:Questions]]
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
 

Latest revision as of 15:40, 13 April 2024


Question: Why would Joseph Smith use a non-religious vehicle for presenting a temple ordinance?

The Endowment is not a Masonic ritual

First off, the endowment is not a Masonic ritual. Freemasonry has no actual relationship to Solomon's temple, and has no actual religious elements. No one ever became a Mason in an LDS Temple and no one has ever been endowed in a Masonic Lodge. However, rituals have proven pedagogical value. Some critics of the temple ceremony would seem to want to paint the LDS Church and the faith as some sort of restorationist version of Calvinism where an unflinching and unforgiving God metes out eternal separation of families. This ignores the reality of the universalist nature of LDS theology and its view of a supremely loving Father providing a plan where ALL of His children can continue to advance and make themselves better both as individuals and as wider families through the atoning sacrifice of Christ..


Notes