View source for Stephen E. Robinson: "Yet another way in which anti-Mormon critics often misrepresent LDS doctrine is in the presentation of anomalies as though they were the doctrine of the Church"

{{Main Page}}
<onlyinclude>
==Stephen E. Robinson: "Yet another way in which anti-Mormon critics often misrepresent LDS doctrine is in the presentation of anomalies as though they were the doctrine of the Church"==
BYU professor Stephen E. Robinson wrote:
<blockquote>
Yet another way in which anti-Mormon critics often misrepresent LDS doctrine is in the presentation of anomalies as though they were the doctrine of the Church. Anomalies occur in every field of human endeavor, even in science. An anomaly is something unexpected that cannot be explained by the existing laws or theories, but which does not constitute evidence for changing the laws and theories. An anomaly is a glitch.... A classic example of an anomaly in the LDS tradition is the so-called "Adam-God theory." During the latter half of the nineteenth century Brigham Young made some remarks about the relationship between Adam and God that the Latter-day Saints have never been able to understand. The reported statements conflict with LDS teachings before and after Brigham Young, as well as with statements of President Young himself during the same period of time. So how do Latter-day Saints deal with the phenomenon? We don't; we simply set it aside. It is an anomaly. On occasion my colleagues and I at Brigham Young University have tried to figure out what Brigham Young might have actually said and what it might have meant, but the attempts have always failed. The reported statements simply do not compute—we cannot make sense out of them. This is not a matter of believing it or disbelieving it; we simply don't know what "it" is. If Brigham Young were here we could ask him what he actually said and what he meant by it, but he is not here.... For the Latter-day Saints, however, the point is moot, since whatever Brigham Young said, true or false, was never presented to the Church for a sustaining vote. It was not then and is not now a doctrine of the Church, and...the Church has merely set the phenomenon aside as an anomaly.<ref>Stephen E. Robinson, [http://www.lightplanet.com/mormons/response/general/christians/ser2.htm "The Exclusion by Misrepresentation"].</ref>
</blockquote>
</onlyinclude>
{{endnotes sources}}
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
[[Category:The Changing World of Mormonism]]
[[Category:The Kingdom of the Cults]]

[[es:Fuente:Robinson:La Exclusión por Falsedad:la presentación de anomalías como si fueran la doctrina de la Iglesia]]
[[pt:Fonte:Robinson:A exclusão por erro de interpretação: A apresentação de anomalias como se fossem doutrinas da Igreja]]