• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

FAIR

Faithful Study Resources for Come, Follow Me

  • Find Answers
  • Blog
  • Media & Apps
  • Conference
  • Bookstore
  • Archive
  • About
  • Get Involved
  • Search
You are here: Home / Home Page / Current Events / The Vallow-Daybell Trial

The Vallow-Daybell Trial

Daybell and Vallow’s beliefs are not taught by the Church or its leaders.

Leaders of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have consistently taught its members to avoid fundamentalism and extremism.

Who are Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow Daybell?

Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow Daybell will soon be tried for the murder of Daybell’s first wife and two of Vallow’s children. The deaths are a senseless tragedy, and we cannot imagine a church leader or faithful church member who would not utterly condemn the murders. Our scripture teaches “gentleness…meekness, and…love unfeigned” (Doctrine and Covenants 121:41), condemns murder (D&C 42:18-19), and encourages all to “proclaim peace” (D&C 98:16). Some who are unfamiliar with the church and its teachings may think the Daybell case shows we are violent extremists, or that we encourage others to be so, but nothing could be further from the truth.

No Basis in Church Doctrine or Teachings

Daybell and Vallow claimed their ideology and actions were based on church teachings, but they improperly used and twisted obscure, possibly inaccurate, historic statements instead of mainstream reliable sources. Church leaders have specifically counseled against relying on vague passages of scripture or quotes from long-ago church addresses. In 2012, Apostle Neil L. Andersen taught: “There is an important principle that governs the doctrine of the Church. The doctrine is taught by all 15 members of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve. It is not hidden in an obscure paragraph of one talk. True principles are taught frequently and by many. Our doctrine is not difficult to find.” 

Out of Context

Similarly, church leaders have counseled against emphasizing statements from church leaders in the distant past that contradict teachings by modern leadership. We honor and obey past leaders, but it’s problematic to take a single, obscure statement or idea out of its historical context and apply it to modern circumstances. If older teachings are still helpful, they’re often quoted by modern leaders.

Recent teaching is the standard members should pay attention to. As Ezra Taft Benson, church president from 1985 to 1994 taught: “The most important prophet, so far as we are concerned, is the one who is living in our day and age. This is the prophet who has today’s instructions from God to us. God’s revelation to Adam did not instruct Noah how to build the ark…Beware of those who would set up the dead prophets against the living prophets, for the living prophets always take precedence.” General Authority Allen D. Haynie reiterated in April 2023: “We do not use the words of past prophets to discount current prophets.”

An Example

A specific example is Daybell’s claim that he has experienced “multiple mortal probations” (a version of reincarnation). A very few statements from early church history can, if taken out of context, make a weak case that people are reborn into different identities. But literally no church leader after the late 19th century has even plausibly alluded to the concept, let alone taught it as truth. And literally every church leader has instead taught that every person follows the same course from pre-mortal life, to mortality on earth, to death and resurrection.

It is simply false to say “multiple mortal probations” is church doctrine, or taught by church leaders, or believed by the vast majority of church members. (For an in-depth debunking of the idea of “multiple mortal probations, see this article.) As Elder Andersen taught, we shouldn’t look in obscure sources for truth and understanding. And as President Benson taught, obscure statements from long ago never override more recent teachings.

Purpose of Membership Councils

Some may wonder how Daybell and Vallow were able to promote such fringe ideas while being members of the church in good standing. The answer is that restriction or withdrawal of church membership is not usually appropriate for cases of fringe beliefs. Membership councils are reserved for serious sins like murder and abuse. Apostasy is a basis for a membership council, but Daybell and Vallow’s beliefs were in a gray area. They publicly promoted fringe beliefs, but church policy is to only hold a membership council for apostasy if the member:

  • Repeatedly acts in clear and deliberate public opposition to the Church, its doctrine, its policies, or its leaders,

  • Persists in teaching as Church doctrine what is not Church doctrine after being corrected by the bishop or stake president, or

  • Shows a pattern of intentionally working to weaken the faith and activity of Church members.

Members of the church have freedom to study and interpret the gospel in eccentric ways. Daybell and Vallow’s teachings were not from a position of authority in the church. And they did not publicly advocate murder or other crimes so far as we know. At the local level where decisions about excommunication are made, Church leaders are volunteers who may not have time to review everything their members are writing and saying.

extreme misinterpretations of Church doctrine

The following essays place into context some of the claims of Vallow and Daybell, and show how they are extreme misinterpretations of Church doctrine. It is our hope that Church members, journalists, and other interested individuals can use these materials to understand that Church teachings, if actually followed by Vallow and Daybell, would have prevented these heinous crimes.

Davidic Servant

The Davidic Servant: Claims to be a prophesied leader are disproven by scripture and Church teaching.

End-times Prophecy

End Times Prophecy: Church teaching encourages charity and righteousness, not extremism.

Multiple Mortal Probations

Reincarnation or “Multiple Mortal Probations”: Church leaders and scriptures have never taught and do not support this theory.

"Preparing a People"

Preparing A People: A private group of extremist Church members, never endorsed by the Church or even heard of by most members.

Scriptural Justification for Violence

Scriptural Justification for Violence: Vallow and Daybell twisted, misinterpreted, and violated the scriptures.

The 144 Thousand

The 144,000: Extremist claims about this group are not supported by any scriptures or Church teachings.

Translated Beings

Translated Beings: Vallow’s claim to have been “translated” is a misapplication of Church doctrine and is not a common belief among members.

Contact us with further questions

Sources for further study:

  • In the News: Chad and Lori Daybell and Gospel Extremism
  • A house of order, a house of God: Recycled challenges to the legitimacy of the church
  • Valiant in the Testimony of Jesus
  • The Trek Continues!
  • Trust in the Lord
  • False Revelation and Gospel Extremism

Footer

FairMormon Logo

FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Our Friends

  • BYU Religious Studies Center
  • BYU Studies
  • Book of Mormon Central
  • TheFamilyProclamation.org
  • Interpreter Foundation
  • Wilford Woodruff Papers Project

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • iTunes
  • YouTube
Android app on Google Play Download on the App Store

Donate to FAIR

We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.

Donate Now

Site Footer

Copyright © 1997-2023 by The Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of FAIR, its officers, directors or supporters.

No portion of this site may be reproduced without the express written consent of The Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research, Inc.

Any opinions expressed, implied, or included in or with the goods and services offered by FAIR are solely those of FAIR and not those of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research (FAIR) Logo

FAIR is controlled and operated by the Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research (FAIR)