![FairMormon Logo](https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2021_fair_logo_primary.png)
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Algunos afirman que no hubo avivamientos religiosos en el Palmyra, área de Nueva York en 1820, contrariamente a las afirmaciones de José Smith que durante ese año se produjo "una agitación extraordinaria sobre el tema de la religión ... de hecho, todo el barrio de país parecía afectada por esto " Joseph Smith—History 1:5
José Smith habló de observar, como de 14 años de edad, "una agitación extraordinaria sobre el tema de la religión" en el área de Palmyra durante la primavera de 1820. Joseph señala que "Se comenzó con los metodistas, pero pronto se generalizó entre todos las sectas en esa región del país ". Existe evidencia documentada de al menos una reunión campamento Metodista en el área de Palmyra durante ese período, que sólo por casualidad pasó a ser mencionado en el periódico local debido a una muerte específica que parecía estar asociada a ella. Es razonable suponer que los metodistas tenían más de una reunión de campo durante este período. Además, hay artículos de prensa que hablan de la actividad reactivación a gran escala en la región más grande que rodea Palmyra durante el mismo período general cuando José Smith dijo que estaba teniendo lugar.
Es interesante notar que un sitio web Critical intenta desestimar evidencia de reuniones campestres metodistas en la zona de Palmira en 1820 porque no son "revivals", ofreciendo esta excusa débil:
El ensayo de la iglesia de noviembre 2013 y FAIR (un sitio LDS apologista oficial) afirman que hubo un resurgimiento en 1820. Ellos utilizan el término renacimiento libremente para ayudar a convencer a los investigadores que las afirmaciones de Smith son correctos. Un anuncio en el periódico para una reunión de campamento de la iglesia no es un avivamiento que hace que el "entusiasmo religioso" que Smith describió. [1]
Descripción del crítico es incorrecta: Esto no fue "un anuncio en un periódico para una reunión de campamento de la iglesia." Era un artículo de periódico sobre un muerte que ocurrió cerca de la reunión de campo - la reunión de campamento en sí nunca fue publicada en el periódico, y probablemente nunca hubiera sido. Sin embargo, su mención en el periódico es evidencia de que 'estaban detenidos en la zona en ese momento' reuniones campestres metodistas . La única razón por la que uno se mencionó se debe a la muerte asociada a ella.
Se debe tener en cuenta que José Smith nunca utiliza el término "renacimiento" en su descripción - él simplemente lo describió como "una agitación extraordinaria sobre el tema de la religión." Para un niño de 14 años que había estado preocupado acerca de la religión de partida a los 12 años después de la reactivación de 1817, las reuniones de campo en curso en la ciudad en la que vivió sin duda calificar.
A Presbyterian historian on Wikipedia comments on this FAIR Wiki article:
FAIR disagrees with your assessment and stubbornly holds to an 1820 date, Methodist camp meetings as interdenominational revivals, no date conflation, and local newspapers not reporting local news. The FAIR page never suggests that the time and place of the interdenominational religious awakening is irrelevant...[2]
Indeed, we "stubbornly hold" to the 1820 date, and we do not consider the time and place of religious awakening irrelevant. This claim by critics that there is no record of revival activity in the region surrounding Palmyra during the 1820 timeframe has simply not stood up to historical scrutiny. References to regional revival activity in the Palmyra Register, a newspaper which Joseph's family would have read, are clearly evident. While these revivals did not occur in Palmyra itself, their mention in the local newspaper would have given Joseph Smith the sense that there was substantial revival activity in the region. [3]
Critics often wish to place the revival which Joseph spoke about in 1818. However, even though we know that a revival occurred in Palmyra during June 1818, there is no mention of it in the town paper, despite the fact that it was attended by Robert R. Roberts, who was one of "only three Methodist bishops in North America." [4]
Once again, the commonality of such an event did not ensure that it would get a mention—yet, by the critics' same argument, this "silence" in the newspaper should mean that the 1818 revival didn't happen either.
La preocupación de José acerca de la religión comenzó cuando tenía doce años de edad, cerca de la mano de la reactivación de 1817. En su relato de 1832, Joseph señala que su preocupación acerca de la religión comenzó a los 12 años (1817-1818)
Aproximadamente a la edad de doce años, mi mente se convierten en serio anticipos con respecto a las preocupaciones de todos los importent de para el bienestar los de mi alma inmortal, que me llevó a escudriñar las Escrituras believeing como me enseñaron, que contenían la palabra de Dios aplicando así mismo a ellos y mi conocimiento íntimo de las de diferentes denominaciones me llevó a admirar excedingly para que descubrí que no adornan en lugar de adornar su profesión por un paseo santa y piadosa conversación agradable para lo que encontré que figura en dicho depósito sagrado se trataba [5]
Richard Bushman señala que esto "habría sido a finales de 1817 y principios de 1818, cuando el todavía se sintieron después-afecta de la reactivación de 1816 y 1817 en Palmyra." [6]
José Smith habló de observar, como un niño de 14 años de edad, "una agitación extraordinaria sobre el tema de la religión" en el área de Palmyra durante la primavera de 1820. Joseph señala que "Empezó entre los metodistas, pero pronto se generalizó entre todas las sectas en esa región del país. "Existe evidencia documentada de por lo menos una reunión de campamento metodista en la región de Palmyra durante ese período, que sólo por casualidad pasó a ser mencionado en el periódico local, debido a una muerte concreta que parece estar asociado con él. Además, hay artículos de prensa que hablan de la actividad de reactivación a gran escala en la región más grande que rodea Palmyra durante el mismo período general cuando José Smith dijo que estaba teniendo lugar.
Es razonable suponer en base a los hechos que los metodistas tenían más de una reunión al aire durante este período. Esto fácilmente podría ser responsable de la emoción religiosa en Palmyra que, en la mente de José a los 14 años, comenzó con los metodistas.
José continúa en su relato 1832: "Así, desde la edad de doce años en quince meditaba muchas cosas en mi corazón acerca de la situación del mundo de la humanidad las contiendas y divisiones de la iniquidad y abominaciones y de la oscuridad que invadía el de la mente de la humanidad se convierta en mi mente muy apenado por me convierto condenado por mis pecados ". En julio de 1819, varios años después de Joseph dijo que su mente se volvió "más que impresionados", una importante conferencia Metodista se llevó a cabo cerca de Palmyra:
Los metodistas de la Conferencia de Genesee se reunieron durante una semana en Viena (más tarde Phelps), un pueblo de trece millas al sureste de la granja de Smith en el camino a Ginebra. Cerca de 110 ministros de una región que se extiende 500 millas desde Detroit a los Catskills y desde Canadá a Pennsylvania se reunieron bajo la dirección del obispo Robert RR para recibir instrucción y establecer la política. Si hemos de juzgar por la experiencia en otras conferencias, los ministros predicaron entre las sesiones a las personas que se dieron cita en muchas millas a la redonda. Fue un año importante para la religión en todo el distrito. . . . El Presbiterio de Ginebra, que incluía las iglesias en el área inmediata de José, informó en febrero de 1820, que "durante el pasado año más han sido recibidos en la comunión de las Iglesias que tal vez en cualquier año anterior." Metodistas mantienen registros de las congregaciones individuales, pero en 1821 se construyó un nuevo centro de reuniones en la ciudad. [7]
Non-Mormon evidence demonstrates that there was a considerable increase in membership among some Christian sects. One source goes so far as to point out the growth over a given period without explicit revivals:
David Marks was born the same year as Joseph Smith, 1805. His parents moved to Junius, not far from Palmyra, when he was a teenager. He became very religious very early, and left home to become an itinerant Baptism minister. He published his memoirs in 1831. Here are some things he has to say about happenings in Junius and Phelps [Vienna], in 1819:
Clearly, there was extensive religious excitement in the Palmyra area. A young man of Joseph's age was likewise much taken by it, as Joseph himself was.
Joseph states that about 1820 "an unusual excitement on the subject of religion" had commenced, and that "[i]t commenced with the Methodists, but soon became general among all the sects in that region of country." The Palmyra newspaper reported many conversions in the “burned-over” district. The Palmyra Register recorded that the Methodists had a religious camp meeting in 1820. [10] Since they did not have a chapel yet, they would meet in the woods on Vienna Road. [11] Pomeroy Tucker (a witness hostile to Joseph Smith) states that “protracted revival meetings were customary in some of the churches, and Smith frequented those of different denominations…” [12] These revivals in 1820 must have helped the Methodists, for they were able to build their first church in Palmyra by 1822, down on Vienna Road where they held their camp meetings.[13] The Zion Episcopal Church was originated in 1823. [14] In 1817, the Presbyterians were able to split into an eastern group and a western group. The eastern group used the only actual church building that was in Palmyra in 1820, while the western group assembled in the town hall. [15]
Ironically, evidence for local religious meetings was less likely to be documented in the newspapers because they were so common. One report of a Methodist camp meeting in Palmyra only made it into the local newspaper because of a fatality due to alcohol consumption. The paper, in a less politically correct time, pointed out that the deceased was Irish and had died due to alcohol at the Camp-ground outside Palmyra:
The deceased, we are informed, arrived at Mr. McCollum's house the evening preceding, from a camp-meeting which was held in this vicinity, in a state of intoxication....It is supposed he obtained his liquor, which was no doubt the cause of his death, at the Camp-ground, where, it is a notorious fact, the intemperate, the lewd and dissolute part of community too frequently resort for no better object, than to gratify their base propensities.[16]
The Methodists strenuously objected to the implication that their camp meetings where places where people came to get drunk. The Palmyra Register printed a clarification about a week later:
By this expression we did not mean to insinuate, that he obtained it within the enclosure of their place of worship, or that he procured it of them, but at the grog-shops that were established at, or near if you please, their camp-ground. It was far from our intention to charge the Methodists with retailing ardent spirits while professedly met for the worship of their God.[17]
Thus, Joseph's recollection of religious excitement in Palmyra is confirmed at the very edge of the Spring of 1820; very close to the time when he said he prayed to God about religion. [18]
Some critics and armchair scholars have come to the conclusion that some of the revival story elements found in Joseph Smith's 1838 historical narrative are not really accurate, but rather are representative of a conflation of facts. These people believe that Joseph Smith was actually mixing parts of 1818 and 1824-25 Palmyra revival activities into his storyline about what happened in 1820. In other words, they claim that the Prophet's narrative is not historically accurate - but not deceptively so.
The problem with the 'conflation theory' is two-fold: (1) It can be demonstrated that one of the most important pieces of documentary evidence which is used to support this theory does not actually say what some people think it says - see the FAIRwiki paper called Conflation of 1824-25 revival?. (2) There is plenty of documentary evidence that shows abundant revival activity in the general region surrounding Palmyra, New York during an 1819-1820 time period. A careful examination of Joseph Smith's 1838 narrative reveals that three distinct zones of revival activity are being referred to by him and each of these can be confirmed in non-LDS newspapers and ecclesiastical sources. When all of these sources are taken into account the idea of conflation loses most of its strength.
Source:Palmyra Register:28 June 1820:5 July 1820:It was far from our intention to charge the Methodists with retailing ardent spirits while professedly met for the worship of their God Source:Benajah Williams:July 1820:Had a two Days meeting at Sq Bakers in Richmond
It is claimed that there were no religious revivals in the Palmyra, New York area in 1820, and that Gordon B. Hinckley cited false information regarding an 1820 revival in a book called Truth Restored. The material found in Truth Restored was written in 1947 under the title What of the Mormons? It was written as an introduction to the Church for non-members when Gordon B. Hinckley was a 37-year-old employee of the Church.
Several chapters were later reprinted as Truth Restored. The relevant material reads as follows:
This condition among the people of the frontier areas of America became a matter of serious concern to religious leaders. A crusade was begun to "convert the unconverted." It was carried over a vast area from the New England states to Kentucky. In 1820 it reached western New York. The ministers of the various denominations united in their efforts, and many conversions were made among the scattered settlers. One week a Rochester paper noted: "More than two hundred souls have become hopeful subjects of divine grace in Palmyra, Macedon, Manchester, Lyons, and Ontario since the late revival commenced." The week following it was able to report "that in Palmyra and Macedon . . . more than four hundred souls have already confessed that the Lord is good."[19]
The source for this claim is Preston Nibley, Joseph Smith the Prophet (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1946), pp. 21-22. Nibley, in turn is quoting from Willard Bean, A. B. C. History of Palmyra and the Beginning of "Mormonism (1938).[20] Bean writes:
In the year 1819 a sort of religious awakening... spread... After reaching New York it spread to the rural districts upstate, reaching Palmyra and vicinity in the Spring of 1820.... The revival started the latter part of April [1820]... which gave the farmers a chance to attend the meetings... By the first of May, the revival was well under way with scores of people confessing religion... The revival had been even more successful than the ministers had anticipated. I quote from the Religious Advocate of Rochester: 'More than 200 souls have become hopeful subjects of divine grace in Palmyra, Macedon, Manchester, Lyons and Ontario since the late revival commenced. This is a powerful work. It is among young as well as old people.... A week later [also from the 'Religious Advocate' of Rochester]... 'It may be added that in Palmyra and Macedon, including Methodist, Presbyterian and Baptist churches, more than 400 have already confessed that the Lord is good. The work is still progressing. In neighboring towns, the number is great and still increasing. Glory be to God on high; and on earth peace and good will to all men.'"[21]
Yet, as the Reverend Wesley Walters pointed out in his article which attempted to dispute the existence of a revival, this is almost certainly a miscitation, since the quoted newspaper did not begin publication until 1825.[22]
Thus, Gordon Hinckley (1947) quoted a line from Nibley (1946), who was quoting from Bean (1938) that was in error. It is important to remember, however, that then-Bro. Hinckley's book was not intended to be a scholarly treatise, but was an introduction to the basics of Church history. The material from 1947 was later reprinted as Truth Restored.
Despite the claims of Walters and other critics, modern research has demonstrated that there were religious meeting in the Palmyra area in 1820. The cited newspaper article did not apply to the 1820 events, but other reports are known today which would make the same point.
The evidence does not suggest that this was an attempt to deceive, but simply an error that was perpetuated between multiple authors.
Anti-Mormon authors should be well aware of this phenomenon—anti-Mormon arguments are constantly recycled and requoted by their successors, with little heed given to LDS responses or the primary sources. In this respect, the Church has done better than the critics—the current brief introduction to Church history, Our Heritage, quotes no newspapers about the 1820 revival.[23]
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now