Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Debunking FairMormon

Revision as of 15:44, 21 July 2014 by RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (m)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

A FairMormon Analysis of "A Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony"

Googling is not a synonym for seeking.

—Steven C. Harper, Joseph Smith's First Vision: A Guide to the Historical Accounts (2012), 11–12

∗       ∗       ∗

Does FairMormon agree with a large percentage of the claims made in the Letter to the CES Director?
Jeremy Runnells has claimed that FairMormon has agreed with him on a large percentage of various claims he has made, even going so far as to claim agreement on items that FairMormon did not respond to. With regard to historical facts, Mr. Runnells's citations are sometimes incorrect and his interpretations, even of correctly cited historical facts, are unwarranted. In short, FairMormon disagrees entirely with the conclusions reached by Jeremy Runnells.

∗       ∗       ∗

Overview

The author produced an apologetic called "Debunking FairMormon" after our original summary response. Much of the material is simply an incorporation of our original summary responses to the individual issues, and the author's reassertion of his original claims. Responses to most of these issues are included in the full wiki articles that are now transcluded into the CES Letter response. In this page we highlight new individual items which were not covered in the original CES Letter response.

Detailed responses by section are found in linked subarticles below

Response to section "Polygamy/Polyandry Concerns & Questions"

Summary: Regarding Joseph's practice of polygamy, the author states that "Joseph Smith’s pattern of behavior or modus operandi for a period of at least 10 years of his adult life was to keep secrets, be deceptive, and be dishonest – both privately and publicly."

Notes (click to expand)