Difference between revisions of "Question: Why was Joseph fined if he wasn't found guilty of anything?"

(Question: Why was Joseph fined if he wasn't found guilty of anything?)
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
[[en:Question: Why was Joseph fined if he wasn't guilty?]]
+
 
 
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Por qué fue José multado si él no era culpable?]]
 
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Por qué fue José multado si él no era culpable?]]
 
[[pt:Pergunta: Por que José foi multado se ele não era culpado?]]
 
[[pt:Pergunta: Por que José foi multado se ele não era culpado?]]

Revision as of 15:45, 5 June 2017

FAIR Answers—back to home page

Question: Why was Joseph fined if he wasn't found guilty of anything?

Joseph was never fined - the bills from Judge Neely and Constable DeZeng were for court costs

The court did not assess a fine against Joseph. There were bills made out by Judge Neely and Constable DeZeng, but these were for costs. Those bills were directed to the County for payment of witnesses, etc., not to Joseph.


Notes