FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Search results
Create the page "JST" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- ==Question: What is the nature of the Joseph Smith Translation (JST)?== ===Question: Is the JST intended primarily or solely as a restoration of lost Bible text?===2 KB (367 words) - 16:31, 28 April 2024
- ==Question: What is the relationship between the JST and biblical manuscripts?== ...of the text in question. We are not entirely sure, but in either case the JST does claim to be, in part, a restoration.4 KB (737 words) - 16:33, 28 April 2024
-
31 bytes (3 words) - 19:51, 1 October 2006
-
99 bytes (15 words) - 20:50, 7 May 2024
- ...translation procedure used by Joseph Smith and his scribes to produce the JST?== The original manuscripts of the JST, as well as the Bible used in the revision, still exist. They show the foll2 KB (247 words) - 16:37, 28 April 2024
- ==Question: Did Adam Clarke's Bible Commentary significanly influence the JST?== ...pectives'', September 26, 2019, https://www.ldsperspectives.com/2017/09/26/jst-adam-clarke-commentary/.</ref></blockquote>15 KB (2,398 words) - 16:33, 28 April 2024
- ==Question: Why does the Church continue to use the KJV instead of the JST as its official bible?== ...is no revelation that has directed the Church to replace the KJV with the JST. Such a change would require both prophetic instruction and a sustaining vo5 KB (793 words) - 22:10, 29 April 2024
- ...le/Joseph Smith Translation/As a restoration of the original Bible text|l2=JST as original Bible text restoration|Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Translation401 bytes (63 words) - 13:26, 6 June 2017
-
99 bytes (15 words) - 20:50, 7 May 2024
-
124 bytes (16 words) - 14:41, 27 April 2024
- ...nism and the Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/As the Church's official Bible/JST an embarrassment to leaders/CriticalSources]]141 bytes (19 words) - 09:17, 17 April 2011
- {{jst links}}42 bytes (5 words) - 10:28, 25 May 2010
-
1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 15:56, 17 March 2024
- ...nism and the Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/As the Church's official Bible/JST an embarrassment to leaders/CriticalSources]]141 bytes (19 words) - 09:08, 17 April 2011
-
54 bytes (8 words) - 16:28, 30 November 2023
- ==Question: Was the JST ever completed?== ...ation or elaboration. Joseph was, however, collecting funds to publish the JST—which indicates that he believed it was ready for public use and cons2 KB (303 words) - 16:34, 28 April 2024
- ==Question: Why does the JST translation of Genesis (the Pearl of Great Price's Book of Moses) contain N ...f Moses comes from the few chapters of the JST—it is essentially the JST of the first chapters of Genesis.11 KB (1,647 words) - 16:35, 28 April 2024
- #REDIRECT [[The Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/As the Church's official Bible/JST an embarrassment to leaders/CriticalSources]]127 bytes (17 words) - 17:12, 30 November 2023
- |name= Joseph Smith Translation (JST) of the bible |title=Learn more about the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) of the bible3 KB (409 words) - 01:23, 27 April 2024
- ...rces box:The Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/As the Church's official Bible/JST an embarrassment to leaders/CriticalSources]]157 bytes (21 words) - 14:40, 27 April 2024
Page text matches
- ==Question: What is the nature of the Joseph Smith Translation (JST)?== ===Question: Is the JST intended primarily or solely as a restoration of lost Bible text?===2 KB (367 words) - 16:31, 28 April 2024
- ==Question: What is the relationship between the JST and biblical manuscripts?== ...of the text in question. We are not entirely sure, but in either case the JST does claim to be, in part, a restoration.4 KB (737 words) - 16:33, 28 April 2024
- |H=Joseph Smith Translation (JST) of the Bible and the Book of Mormon |L4=Question: If the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) is Joseph Smith's 'correction' of Biblical errors, why do these correction2 KB (366 words) - 23:15, 6 May 2024
- |L2=Question: If the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) is Joseph Smith's 'correction' of Biblical errors, why do these correction {{:Question: If the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) is Joseph Smith's 'correction' of Biblical errors, why do these correction2 KB (274 words) - 15:49, 13 April 2024
- ...t/55 JST] | Matthew 17:10 - 14, italics represent differences from KJV and JST text) The JST of Mark makes John the Baptist's appearance explicit:13 KB (2,125 words) - 15:14, 13 April 2024
- *[[Template:JSTWiki|JST]]3 KB (342 words) - 13:24, 6 June 2017
- ...translation procedure used by Joseph Smith and his scribes to produce the JST?== The original manuscripts of the JST, as well as the Bible used in the revision, still exist. They show the foll2 KB (247 words) - 16:37, 28 April 2024
- ==Question: Did Adam Clarke's Bible Commentary significanly influence the JST?== ...pectives'', September 26, 2019, https://www.ldsperspectives.com/2017/09/26/jst-adam-clarke-commentary/.</ref></blockquote>15 KB (2,398 words) - 16:33, 28 April 2024
- ==Question: Why does the Church continue to use the KJV instead of the JST as its official bible?== ...is no revelation that has directed the Church to replace the KJV with the JST. Such a change would require both prophetic instruction and a sustaining vo5 KB (793 words) - 22:10, 29 April 2024
- | JST = Joseph Smith Translation (JST)2 KB (235 words) - 13:56, 6 June 2017
- |summary=If the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) is Joseph Smith's 'correction' of Biblical errors, why do these correction409 bytes (56 words) - 15:55, 13 April 2024
- {{jst links}}43 bytes (5 words) - 15:57, 13 April 2024
- {{:Question: If the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) is Joseph Smith's 'correction' of Biblical errors, why do these correction24 KB (3,653 words) - 14:11, 13 April 2024
- |L44=Response to claim: "when Joseph Smith wrote the JST of the Bible, he also went back and corrected Christ’s Sermon on the Moun ==Response to claim: "when Joseph Smith wrote the JST of the Bible, he also went back and corrected Christ’s Sermon on the Moun53 KB (8,529 words) - 14:18, 13 April 2024
- ...le/Joseph Smith Translation/As a restoration of the original Bible text|l2=JST as original Bible text restoration|Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Translation401 bytes (63 words) - 13:26, 6 June 2017
- {{disinformation|This is flatly untrue. Passages from the JST are included in the footnotes of the current Latter-day Saint scriptures. ...ion|Less than a year later, the Church ''did'' publish huge amounts of the JST in the KJV Bible version after years of work. (See [[#383|above]].)12 KB (1,895 words) - 14:17, 13 April 2024
- ...Joseph, to get the new translation [recall that Emma and the RLDS had the JST manuscripts at this point, so Brigham had no access to them]; but the Bible1 KB (242 words) - 13:56, 6 June 2017
- * It is claimed that the JST has been a "source of much embarrassment" for leaders of the Church, and pr * Yet, this quote says nothing about the JST or being ashamed of it.487 bytes (70 words) - 15:41, 13 April 2024
- [[Category:JST]]1 KB (215 words) - 22:09, 29 April 2024
- ...nism and the Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/As the Church's official Bible/JST an embarrassment to leaders/CriticalSources]]141 bytes (19 words) - 09:17, 17 April 2011