• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

FAIR

  • Find Answers
  • Blog
  • Media & Apps
  • Conference
  • Bookstore
  • Archive
  • About
  • Get Involved
  • Search

Coins in the Book of Mormon

January 9, 2008 by awyatt

One of the standard chestnuts used by critics is that the Book of Mormon cannot be true because it talks of coins in Alma 11, and everyone knows that there have never been any coins discovered from the civilizations purportedly described in the book.

It apparently doesn’t matter to the critics that the actual text of Alma 11 never talks of coins, and the words coin, coins, or coinage never appear once in the book. This canard continues to appear in newer attacks on the Church, including recent videos from Living Hope Ministries.

Tyler Livingston of FAIR has recently finished putting together a short video on this topic. I hope you find it interesting.

Filed Under: Book of Mormon

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Marc says

    January 9, 2008 at 5:18 pm

    Excellent post, and congrats on the new blog. I really, *really* like that video format – good length, good information, good to put a face behind a name.

  2. KC says

    January 9, 2008 at 7:11 pm

    Amid all the hubbub of people chattering about the Doubleday edition of the Book of Mormon changing the introduction from “primary” to “among the” regarding the Lamanites, no one seemed to bother to notice that the heading the Alma 11 was also changed: from “Nephite Coinage” to “Nephite Monetary System.”

    We should expect to see this change in all future printings of the Book of Mormon.

  3. Stephen M (Ethesis) says

    January 9, 2008 at 7:51 pm

    Glad to see you on-line with a blog and still on-line otherwise.

    Best,

    Steve

  4. Kim Siever says

    January 9, 2008 at 10:13 pm

    I have to agree with Marc. I enjoyed the video format.

  5. Tossman says

    January 9, 2008 at 10:44 pm

    Excellent first post. I really enjoyed the video. Welcome to the bloggernacle, and I’ll be a regular visitor.

  6. Seth R. says

    January 10, 2008 at 8:00 am

    Few Evangelical ministers would assert that the footnotes I read in the “New International Version Study Bible” are to be given the same weight as the actual scriptural text itself. Why do they insist that the headers to the chapters in the Book of Mormon be given such weight?

  7. Kevin Barney says

    January 10, 2008 at 8:39 am

    KC, thanks for the awesome information! I remember when the word change to the
    Introduction first broke in a big way, someone mentioned another such change,
    although I can’t remember offhand what it was. Perhaps there area few other
    gems hidden in the Doubleday edition. (I have to admit I don’t own one.)
    It might be worthwhile for someone to take a look and see whether they can catalog all such
    changes.

  8. Mike Parker says

    January 10, 2008 at 9:29 am

    K.C. #2:

    That’s an interesting change, and a welcome one. However, it’s still incorrect: Alma 11 is describing a system of weights and measures, not a “monetary system”. In ancient pre-coin cultures, standardized weights were used to measure grain in exchange for services.

    John Welch wrote a paper about this for FARMS over 20 years ago. Here’s the most recent version:

    http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/display.php?table=jbms&id=198

  9. Aaron Shafovaloff says

    January 10, 2008 at 11:10 am

    I was surprised that the issue of the 1828 dictionary definition of “piece” was never addressed? I’m not an expert on the language of the time, but how do I know you’re not anachronistically reading “piece” into Joseph Smith’s time?

  10. awyatt says

    January 10, 2008 at 11:55 am

    To what are you referring, Aaron? Is this a specific verse you are questioning?

  11. Mike Parker says

    January 10, 2008 at 12:27 pm

    I believe he’s referring to Alma 11:4—

    Now these are the names of the different pieces of their gold, and of their silver, according to their value. And the names are given by the Nephites, for they did not reckon after the manner of the Jews who were at Jerusalem; neither did they measure after the manner of the Jews; but they altered their reckoning and their measure, according to the minds and the circumstances of the people, in every generation, until the reign of the judges, they having been established by king Mosiah.

    The contention that these “pieces” refer to coins is blunted by the fact that in the very same verse the author refers to “measure[s]”, which is consistent with the argument that the “pieces” are weights used to measure amounts of grain, as indicated in verses 7 and 15.

    You can read Webster’s 1828 dictionary entry for “piece” here. Note that its use for describing coins is all the way down in definition 8, while definitions 1 through 4 include a single item as part of a group, again consistent with a group of weights of varying heaviness.

  12. Joey Day says

    January 10, 2008 at 4:34 pm

    All of this begs the question: Even allowing for ‘piece’ to mean a standardized weight of measurement (and the argument seems compelling enough to me at first blush), aren’t you right back where you started from? Has anybody dug up any ancient weights in the Americas? Especially any made of gold or silver? Attempting to explain away the absence of coins by substituting something that’s equally absent from the archaeological record doesn’t make any sense to me.

    Nobody in the video mentions weights being discovered, Welch doesn’t mention any having been discovered in his article (linked in comment #8), and no other commenters have mentioned it. Am I really the first person to have considered this question?

  13. Joey Day says

    January 10, 2008 at 4:48 pm

    Answering my own question…

    http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=jbms&id=199

    In this article, Welch mentions several possibilities, but basically says no, there’s no objective evidence for weights and measures used in ancient mesoamerica. He advocates a kind of wait and see approach.

    So I ask again, aren’t you right back where you started from?

  14. Joey Day says

    January 10, 2008 at 5:06 pm

    Terribly sorry to triple post, but I just want to clarify that, while I do consider myself one of the church’s critics, I’m not among those who claim the Book of Mormon “cannot be true because it talks of coins [or weights, or any other kind of ‘pieces’]”. I consider this issue so tangential to the whole topic of Book of Mormon veracity that I deliberated for a few hours before deciding to comment here at all.

    Finding an ancient mesoamerican weight or even a coin wouldn’t immediately prove to me that the Book of Mormon is true and the absence of said doesn’t prove to me that it’s false. I realize no one here is implying that coins or weights are more important than a careful consideration of the doctrinal claims of the Book of Mormon, but I didn’t want anyone else to think I was implying that either.

  15. Brant Gardner says

    January 10, 2008 at 6:00 pm

    The search for “weights” simply continues to assume a different standard for what was happening. The system sounds like a standardized quantity because we assume that there must have been one that supplied the reasoning behind the system.

    Unfortunately, we have no way of knowing just what was measured. Was it ore or refined metal? Was it worked metal? There is no way to know what the item was being measured, so there is no way to know what to look for to find any kind of standard unit for a measure.

    We do know that later documents do indicate that there were some items that had relative exchange value – a certain number of blankets, a measure of corn, a collection of feathers. There was a perceptual link among them, but the units were not always something that we can reproduce – for example, when the measure was simply a count.

    One of the things I find interesting about the list is that the “measures” differ depending upon what is being measured. Words that measure gold are different from words that measure silver – even though they could be exchanged for the same measures of grain. That sounds like counts in Maya languages, where different shapes are counted differently. I don’t specifically know of material rather than shape, but the concept is the same.

    Unfortunately, the ultimate answer to the Alma 11 list depends on how you come to the text. If you come to the text as an ancient text, then the very reason for having the list is because it is unusual and therefore we shouldn’t expect to find them – because Mormon had to explain it and clearly assumed his readers wouldn’t understand. In virtually every other case, the evidence suggests that while Mormon wrote for a future audience, he assumed that the future audience would be people just like him who understood his world. There is very little of this kind of explanation of overt culture in the whole of the Book of Mormon, reinforcing the idea that we get this because it was considered uncommon.

Trackbacks

  1. Nephite money and “coinage” » FAIR Blog says:
    January 17, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    […] claiming that this in itself makes the Book of Mormon fiction [See Allen Wyatt’s blog, “Coins in the Book of Mormon.”].  Really, I don’t see what the fuss is […]

Primary Sidebar

Faithful Study Resources for Come, Follow Me

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address:

Subscribe to Podcast

Podcast icon
Subscribe to podcast in iTunes
Subscribe to podcast elsewhere
Listen with FAIR app
Android app on Google Play Download on the App Store

Pages

  • Blog Guidelines

FAIR Latest

  • Beauty for Ashes
  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR – Doctrine and Covenants 67–70 – Autumn Dickson
  • Viewing Today’s Culture Through the Lens of the Gospel
  • And We Talk of Christ: Forgiving Through His Light
  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR – Doctrine and Covenants 64–66 – Autumn Dickson

Blog Categories

Recent Comments

  • Nick on As a Little Child
  • David on Come, Follow Me with FAIR – Doctrine and Covenants 49–50 – Autumn Dickson
  • Ana on Come, Follow Me with FAIR – Doctrine and Covenants 45 – Autumn Dickson
  • Kal- El Luke Skywalker on As a Little Child
  • Ned Scarisbrick on An Easter Message from FAIR

Archives

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • iTunes
  • YouTube
Android app on Google Play Download on the App Store

Footer

FairMormon Logo

FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Donate to FAIR

We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.

Donate Now

Site Footer