• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

FAIR

Faithful Study Resources for Come, Follow Me

  • Find Answers
  • Blog
  • Media & Apps
  • Conference
  • Bookstore
  • Archive
  • About
  • Get Involved
  • Search

Gospel Hobbies and the Danger of “All-Consuming Patriotism”

January 6, 2016 by Mike Parker

Recent developments in rural Oregon have prompted Church leaders to respond to the claims of some Latter-day Saints who have taken up arms to protest the actions of the United States federal government.

For over one hundred years, Church presidents and apostles have warned against “religious hobbies” or “gospel hobbies,” which President Joseph F. Smith described as “dangerous because they give undue prominence to certain [gospel] principles or ideas to the detriment and dwarfing of others just as important, just as binding, just as saving” as the doctrines an individual may personally favor (Gospel Doctrine, p. 143).

In 2003 Elder Quentin L. Cook, then a member of the Seventy, explained:

The Lord said regarding important doctrine, “Whosoever declareth more or less than this, the same is not of me” (D&C 10:68) and “That which is more or less than this cometh of evil” (D&C 124:120). We are looking beyond the mark when we elevate any one principle, no matter how worthwhile it may be, to a prominence that lessens our commitment to other equally important principles or when we take a position that is contrary to the teachings of the Brethren.

(“Looking beyond the Mark,” Ensign, March 2003.)

Warning specifically against the gospel hobby of “all-consuming patriotism,” Elder Dallin H. Oaks taught in 1992:

Love of country is surely a strength, but carried to excess it can become the cause of spiritual downfall. There are some citizens whose patriotism is so intense and so all-consuming that it seems to override every other responsibility, including family and Church. I caution those patriots who are participating in or provisioning private armies and making private preparations for armed conflict. Their excessive zeal for one aspect of patriotism is causing them to risk spiritual downfall as they withdraw from the society of the Church and from the governance of those civil authorities to whom our twelfth article of faith makes all of us subject.

(“Our Strengths Can Become Our Downfall,” Ensign, October 1994.)

Filed Under: Doctrine, Politics

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bill Jones says

    January 6, 2016 at 2:19 pm

    Knew a man in California who worked for Fish and Game. He had nothing but bad words to say about them while working for them and even worse after the great retirement package they gave him. Ci surely did not understand.

  2. LdsMarco says

    January 6, 2016 at 6:17 pm

    I’m not saying I disagree to this blog or the leaders of the Church. I just wanted to share what Joseph Smith said in his days. Joseph Smith taught that it was sometimes necessary for men to take up arms because of their religious obligation to defend their families:

    “It may be that the Saints will have to beat their ploughs into swords, for it will not do for men to sit down patiently and see their children destroyed. (HC 6:365.)

    “There is one principle which is eternal; it is the duty of all men to protect their lives and the lives of the household, whenever necessity requires, and no power has a right to forbid it, should the last extreme arrive, but I anticipate no such extreme, but caution is the parent of safety. (HC 6:605.)

    “Peace be still, bury the hatchet and the sword, the sound of war is dreadful in my ear. [But] any man who will not fight for his wife and children is a coward and a bastard.” (An American Prophet’s Record: The Diaries and Journals of Joseph Smith, p. 298.)

  3. Mike Parker says

    January 6, 2016 at 6:49 pm

    LdsMarco,

    Thank you for sharing those quotes. I like them as well, and have used them myself to explain man’s inalienable right to self-defense.

    Do you believe that the situation in Oregon matches the Prophet’s description of when this right should be exercised?

    And do you believe that this right should be exercised, as a group, without instructions from Church leaders?

    (D&C 98 is instructive here.)

  4. MrNirom says

    January 6, 2016 at 8:33 pm

    Has anyone really looked at the abuse the Government has done to this family so far? I suppose it would be just as easy to “walk away” from house, land, animals, and one’s income. If the government did it in the past.. they can and are doing it again to these people. But I suppose there is always the Church to fall back on once you are forced to lose everything.

  5. Greg Hairston says

    January 6, 2016 at 9:45 pm

    Rights are to be exercised when and where an individual chooses, however, they must suffer from the consequences.

    Church leaders have more to loose and may fail to act as soon as required to secure victory, whereas an individual, with much more to lose personally, may act rashly and/or in haste.

    Hindsight is always 20/20, but rights not expressly exercised by individuals are soon lost.

    Perhaps it is better for some to lose their life and save their soul, but then their own children and grandchildren may be forced into slavery.

    I will not be first, but I will not be last, either.

    Leaders must lead.

    I might not wait for ‘instructions’ from the Church leaders.

  6. Rafael Merrill says

    January 6, 2016 at 11:04 pm

    Great comments about gospel hobbies with no acknowledgement of the problem at hand (the over-reach of the Federal government) nor a solution, or a proper course of action. Shall we put our heads in the sand? I prefer a course of action, rather than inaction.

  7. Greg Monik says

    January 7, 2016 at 4:49 pm

    We need to make our voice heard at the ballot box and in the courts. If the government is wrong, we need to change it. The situation, such as in Oregon, cannot be resolved by force but by changing the government to abide by the concepts of our Constitution. We must not become anarchists.

  8. Richard Benson says

    January 7, 2016 at 5:08 pm

    All who have the gift of the Holy Ghost are responsible to use it. That makes me a bit nervous. If you don’t understand what’s being revealed to you, that is your problem and your responsibility. When you are going to kill somebody that can get heavy. I don’t just want to be saved, I want to be exalted. That can be a big difference. I hope if that should come, I will know what to do. Know one who is close to God needs a leader to do what is right. You will feel what is right and you will do it. If God comes to a leader and tells him what is to be done and the leader tells you what that is then the leader can only give you that information; the leader cannot give you revelation. You must find out from God that the leader has spoken the truth. Those who are close to God will know that what the leader has spoken is true and they will know that immediately .

  9. leeuniverse says

    January 10, 2016 at 2:00 am

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1JzuQf4DMU

    For those who care about the truth instead of calling people crazy, or not following Church doctrine etc., this video and the further expouding below should make your blood boil.

    Essentially, the Hammonds set two brush fires that they were charged with, one was entirely legal, but due to the nature of fires it got out of hand some and went onto government owned “sagebrush” land.
    Not only that, but the government themselves admitted the fire was actually a good thing, not bad, it improved the value of the land.
    Another fire they were charged with was an emergency in which Hammond property was threatened, so they again did a controlled burn to create a “backfire”, but this one wasn’t authorized by the government, and that fire burned just “one” acre of government land.
    This fire also the government themselves said the fire was a good thing, that it improved the land.

    The government then decides to charge the Hammonds under a “Terrorist” law, and called the fires “Arson”.
    The law actually states that a fire started must be “malicious” to meet the statute, AND there must be “damage”. Yet in both cases, there was neither malicious action nor actual damage done because it one was in the middle of knowwhere and the fires actually improved the land.

    The judge I don’t know why he didn’t just throw the case out, but he wasn’t willing to at least give the “mandatory” sentence of at least 5 years due to the fact that it was just stupid (my non-legal adlib), and so he sentenced them to much less.
    The government then clearly being the liberal fascists they are entirely vacate the judges rulling and punishment, and absolutely demand the 5 years, comparing the actions of the Hammonds to Terrorism, evil Arsonists, etc. when there was nothing of the sort.

    So basically, this was a complete miscarriage of justice, and this is what the Bundy people are standing against.
    This kind of thing has been occuring for years, constant, nationwide etc. because liberal environmental nutjobs clearly have control of these agency’s, because after all, there are only so many types of jobs environmental fascists can do. So, people that live this life are tired of the constant abuse of power by the Federal Government.

    Follow up more detailed history…..
    US Federal Government vs Oregon Ranchers: Cruel and Unusual Punishments
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mI9IlziWphY

    Anyway, if anyone is actually interested in the actual truth in contrast to liberal lying media and sadly the misinformed Church Public Affairs, you will watch these videos.

  10. Mike Parker says

    January 10, 2016 at 8:43 am

    leeuniverse,

    Speaking for myself and not on behalf of FairMormon, I completely agree that justice has not been served and the federal government is in the wrong in its persecution of the Hammonds.

    But does any of that justify raising an armed militia?

  11. Shanon Edwards says

    January 10, 2016 at 6:29 pm

    The way this blog reads on my iPad, Mike Parker’s photo and bio line is much closer to the response above his, than his own. I was thinking it was his. I had to keep double checking who wrote which post.

  12. Mike Parker says

    January 10, 2016 at 6:37 pm

    Thanks, Shanon. I’ll bring it to the attention of our tech person!

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address:

Subscribe to Podcast

Podcast icon
Subscribe to podcast in iTunes
Subscribe to podcast elsewhere
Listen with FAIR app
Android app on Google Play

Pages

  • Blog Guidelines

FAIR Latest

  • John 14–17 – Faithful Resources for Come, Follow Me 2023 Week 24
  • Cornerstone: A FAIR Temple Preparation Podcast – Episode 4: The Endowment with Nathan Richardson
  • Letter For My Wife Rebuttal, Part 18: The Early Church – Polygamy [C]
  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR: Faithful Answers to New Testament Questions – John 14–17
  • By Study and Faith – Episode 1: What is Critical Thinking?

Blog Categories

Recent Comments

  • Brittany on Letter For My Wife Rebuttal, Part 18: The Early Church – Polygamy [C]
  • TOTAL Nathan on Letter For My Wife Rebuttal, Part 14: The Early Church – The Endowment [A]
  • Sasha Kwapinski on Come, Follow Me with FAIR: Faithful Answers to New Testament Questions – John 14–17
  • Matt on Beyond the Rainbow: Supporting LGBT+ Saints Faithfully
  • Adam on Come, Follow Me with FAIR: Faithful Answers to New Testament Questions – Matthew 19–20; Mark 10; Luke 18

Archives

Footer

FairMormon Logo

FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Our Friends

  • BYU Religious Studies Center
  • BYU Studies
  • Book of Mormon Central
  • TheFamilyProclamation.org
  • Interpreter Foundation
  • Wilford Woodruff Papers Project

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • iTunes
  • YouTube

Donate to FAIR

We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.

Donate Now

Donate to us by shopping at Amazon at no extra cost to you. Learn how →

Site Footer

Copyright © 1997-2023 by The Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of FAIR, its officers, directors or supporters.

No portion of this site may be reproduced without the express written consent of The Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research, Inc.

Any opinions expressed, implied, or included in or with the goods and services offered by FAIR are solely those of FAIR and not those of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research (FAIR) Logo

FAIR is controlled and operated by the Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research (FAIR)