• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

FAIR

2022 FAIR Conference videos are now available to watch!

  • Find Answers
  • Blog
  • Media & Apps
  • Conference
  • Bookstore
  • Archive
  • About
  • Get Involved
  • Search

Something about bigots….

January 18, 2008 by Steven Danderson

There is something about politicians specifically appealing to the bigots among society that really puts me off!

Yesterday in a speech found here, one political candidate (name omitted to protect the guilty–let’s call him Finn, after the Mark Twain character in the book Tom Sawyer) said, “You don’t like people from outside the state coming in and telling you what to do…. In fact, if somebody came to Arkansas and told us what to do with our flag, we’d tell ’em what to do with the pole, that’s what we’d do.” What a “defender of freedom”—except that the flag he refers to is the Confederate battle flag, which some South Carolinians want to use for official functions.

At least twice before, less savory elements of South Carolina, Arkansas and other states used the Confederate battle flag to tell outsiders, in effect, “You can’t tell ME what to do!”—and both times (during the Civil War and at the end of the Jim Crow era) it was because they didn’t want to be told that they couldn’t treat Blacks as subhumans. As author Ayn Rand might put it: There is no such thing as the freedom to enslave!

Unfortunately, this isn’t Finn’s first appeal to less savory elements. Last month, Finn asked a non-LDS interviewer, in a faux-innocent manner, whether Mormons believed that Jesus and Satan are brothers. As much as I would like to think the best of people, I have two reasons for disbelieving this feigned innocence:

1. What would a non-Mormon know about LDS doctrine? If you want to know about LDS doctrine, ask the Latter-day Saints, not somebody from another religion.

2. Finn was keynote speaker at an anti-Mormon convention held in Salt Lake City, headquarters of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. While he didn’t attack Latter-day Saints directly then, his “innocent question” last month was phrased suspiciously like those of anti-Mormons intent on making their opponents seem ridiculous, bizarre, and/or downright evil.

I am not saying that there is no goodness in Finn, though. On the contrary—any person who professes Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, even if not of my group, will be a better person for it. Indeed, his Christian denomination has many ministries helping the less fortunate, and God will surely bless this effort. (Matthew 25:40: “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.”) Two months ago, I would have had no problem accepting him as the GOP presidential nominee.

But since Thanksgiving of last year, Finn has campaigned in a way that appealed to the worst elements of our society—often in a very underhanded manner. Thus, I can’t see how either Blacks or Latter-day Saints can support him.

At least I can respect Bill Keller because he is up-front with his stance on Mormons. With Finn I can’t be sure. While he doesn’t say so directly, he does hint at it—in terms quite intelligible to the bigots among us.

There is one thing I’m sure of: I won’t be supporting Finn until I can be sure that I will not be voting in effect to commit suicide. And that won’t happen until I can be certain that his profession of Jesus Christ is not being overridden by his desire to appeal to the worst elements of a good Christian church—and of humanity.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jon W says

    January 19, 2008 at 2:45 pm

    “Finn” has proven to be nothing but a liability for the Republicans. He is the worst of both worlds, to extreme for non-evangelicals to trust and to economically liberal to even remotely think about voting for.

    The guy has been spouting off a lot of the racial stuff before on Islam and Mexicans. While Romney indulged on the immigration thing I am sure that “Finn” has been much worse.

    His positions are as suspect as one would imagine.

  2. Steven Danderson says

    January 19, 2008 at 7:27 pm

    This comment is cross-posted at: http://heartissuesforlds.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/saturday-discussion-on-mitt-romney/

    Hi!

    I authored one of FAIR’s “leading the charge about bigotry,” and I’d like to set some things straight:

    1. For the record, I HAVE supported non-Mormons against good members of the Church–many times. I agree that religious grouping is usually a poor reason to vote either for or against a candidate.
    2. Even though Utah is 70% LDS, inhabitants seem to have had no problem electing qualified non-Latter-day Saints (For example, Utah was the second state with a Jewish governor! Neighboring Idaho, with a large LDS population, was the first–by two years. See http://www.havelshouseofhistory.com/Jewish%20Governor%20Political%20Items%201.htm and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses_Alexander.).
    3. On the other hand, in my home state of Florida, with inverted ratios of Evangelicals to the LDS, in the entire history of official LDS presence in the state, there was only ONE LDS who was ever elected to statewide office: Paula Hawkins, who lost the next election to Robert Graham, a Baptist [See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Hawkins.%5D.
    4. I have no problem with “Finn” using his Church’s social network as a political base, or with his championing Evangelical Christians as a whole. Evangelical Christians have been getting some bad press over the past several decades. While their worst elements have no doubt deserved that bad press, the vast majority do not. My problems with “Finn” began with his targeted appeals to those in the “worst elements.”
    5. I am not categorically refusing to vote for “Finn,” but he will have to take some substantive steps to undo the harm he did over the last few months. That, however, would cause massive problems with those less savory elements that “Finn” specifically appealed to.

  3. Andrew Miller says

    January 20, 2008 at 10:40 am

    Some people are looking for a Pastor-in-Chief of the United Bigots of America. I cannot, and will not, vote for “Huckaberry Finn” unless he publicly apologizes for his whisper anti-Mormon campaign.

  4. Todd Wood says

    January 21, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    Andrew, did he apologize?

    And by the end of this Presidential campaign, do you think every candidate should be apologizing? Or is it exclusively to one group of religious people that there should be apologies?

    To demolish bigotry is to in equal measure attack strongly every wrong by every candidate. Right?

    Lead the way, Andrew.

  5. Seth R. says

    January 21, 2008 at 6:33 pm

    Todd, Romney didn’t attack anyone’s faith (except arguably atheists). True, he attacked CANDIDATES, but not a group of believers. Nor am I aware of anything tying him to such efforts.

    You just can’t say the same thing about Huckabee.

  6. Andrew Miller says

    January 22, 2008 at 6:39 pm

    Todd,

    If Romney or Hillary or Obama or anyone else were critical of Huckabee for his religious faith, I’d be just as annoyed. I have no problem with evangelicals in public office. I voted for Bush both times (and would again). It’s Mike Huckabee’s bigotry and double-talk that is so problematic.

    For a person to attack another’s political views is fair game in a political contest. To attack them on the basis of their gender, race, religion, education, etc is another issue all together. While political attacks get old, it is not bigotry (Even if some are dishonest).

  7. john f. says

    January 25, 2008 at 4:20 am

    Andrew, I’m not so sure that education should be on your proscribed list. I would think that we want our candidate to be sufficiently qualified, both in terms of education and experience. A comparison of Huckabee and Romney with regard to education is revealing:

    Huckabee: BA in Biblical Studies, graduating magna cum laude from Ouachita Baptist University

    Romney:

    – BA with Highest Honors from Brigham Young University (1971) (Romney began as an undergraduate at Stanford University and completed his first year there but transferred to BYU after his LDS mission to France)

    – MBA from Harvard Business School (1975), where he was named a Baker Scholar;

    – JD, cum laude, from Harvard Law School

    This seems relevant to me, Andrew Miller, and is not in the same set as race, gender, or religion in assessing a candidate’s qualifications and competence in running for President.

  8. Andrew Miller says

    January 25, 2008 at 1:26 pm

    John,

    You’re probably right. However, it’s one thing to compare education levels, and it’s another to mock or belittle a person because of their education or lack thereof. Generally, however, that hasn’t been a problem in politics. The problem now is religion. “Finn” is running for Pastor-in-Chief while desperately trying to make it look like Romney is.

Trackbacks

  1. Mitt Romney » Something about bigots…. says:
    January 18, 2008 at 10:42 pm

    […] Steven Danderson wrote an interesting post today on Something about bigotsâ

  2. Saturday Discussion on Mitt Romney « Heart Issues for LDS says:
    January 19, 2008 at 10:25 am

    […] over here, FAIR is leading the charge about bigotry, here and here.  Yet to be honest, I think we all have religious bias.  Just imagine the scenario of a […]

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


RSS-Icon RSS Feed (all posts)

Subscribe to Podcast

Podcast icon
Subscribe to podcast in iTunes
Subscribe to podcast elsewhere
Listen with FAIR app
Android app on Google Play

Pages

  • Blog Guidelines

FAIR Latest

  • Letter For My Wife Rebuttal, Part 3: The Early Church – The First Vision [B]
  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR: Faithful Answers to New Testament Questions – John 2–4
  • Letter For My Wife Rebuttal, Part 2: The Early Church – The First Vision [A]
  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR: Faithful Answers to New Testament Questions – Matthew 4; Luke 4–5
  • Letter For My Wife Rebuttal, Part 1: Preface/Introduction

Blog Categories

Recent Comments

  • R on Letter For My Wife Rebuttal, Part 2: The Early Church – The First Vision [A]
  • Trevor Holyoak on Come, Follow Me with FAIR: Faithful Answers to New Testament Questions – Matthew 4; Luke 4–5
  • Kelli Brewer on Come, Follow Me with FAIR: Faithful Answers to New Testament Questions – Matthew 4; Luke 4–5
  • John Perry on Letter For My Wife Rebuttal, Part 2: The Early Church – The First Vision [A]
  • John Perry on Letter For My Wife Rebuttal, Part 2: The Early Church – The First Vision [A]

Archives

Footer

FairMormon Logo

FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Our Friends

  • BYU Religious Studies Center
  • BYU Studies
  • Book of Mormon Central
  • TheFamilyProclamation.org
  • Interpreter Foundation
  • Wilford Woodruff Papers Project

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • iTunes
  • YouTube

Donate to FAIR

We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.

Donate Now

Donate to us by shopping at Amazon at no extra cost to you. Learn how →

Site Footer

Copyright © 1997-2023 by The Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of FAIR, its officers, directors or supporters.

No portion of this site may be reproduced without the express written consent of The Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research, Inc.

Any opinions expressed, implied, or included in or with the goods and services offered by FAIR are solely those of FAIR and not those of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research (FAIR) Logo

FAIR is controlled and operated by the Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research (FAIR)