• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

FAIR

  • Find Answers
  • Blog
  • Media & Apps
  • Conference
  • Bookstore
  • Archive
  • About
  • Get Involved
  • Search

LDS Scriptures

Mormon FAIR-Cast 101: Dan Peterson takes questions

August 8, 2012 by SteveDensleyJr

https://media.blubrry.com/mormonfaircast/www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/2012-0731-DAN-PETERSON-ANTI-MORMON-A.mp3

Podcast: Download (38.3MB)

Subscribe: RSS

Dan Peterson takes questions from callers who both support and oppose the Church on this live interview with Mills Crenshaw that appeared on K-Talk radio on July 31, 2012, in Salt Lake City, Utah. Brother Peterson answers questions about the Book of Abraham and a variety of questions about the Book of Mormon, including ones pertaining to DNA studies, Mesoamerican and Near-Eastern archaeology, and Joseph Smith’s production of the Book of Mormon.

A native of southern California, Daniel C. Peterson received a bachelor’s degree in Greek and philosophy from Brigham Young University (BYU) and, after several years of study in Jerusalem and Cairo, earned his Ph.D. in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures from the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA). Dr. Peterson is a professor of Islamic Studies and Arabic at BYU and founder and the editor-in-chief of the University’s Middle Eastern Texts Initiative (METI). He is a past chairman of the board of the Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies (FARMS) and, until very recently, served as Director of Advancement for its successor organization, the Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship. From 1988, when he founded it, through mid-June of 2012, he edited the FARMS Review, which was renamed the Mormon Studies Review in late 2011. He is the author of several books and numerous articles on Islamic and Latter-day Saint topics, including a biography of the Prophet Muhammad (Eerdmans, 2007). A former bishop, Dr. Peterson served in the Switzerland Zürich Mission, and, for approximately eight years, on the Gospel Doctrine writing committee for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. He currently serves as a Gospel Doctrine teacher in his home ward. He is married to the former Deborah Stephens, of Lakewood, Colorado, and they are the parents of three sons.

This recording is posted here by permission of K-Talk Radio. The opinions expressed in this interview do not necessarily represent the views of FAIR or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Filed Under: Anti-Mormon critics, Apologetics, Book of Abraham, Book of Mormon, FAIR Conference, Podcast

Okay, let’s go over this again…

May 1, 2012 by Mike Parker

An inquiry came to FAIR’s “Ask the Apologist” service this morning, asking for help with the following claim on the Wikipedia article “Linguistics and the Book of Mormon”:

Richard Packham has pointed out that several Biblical Hebrew names, including Aaron, Ephraim, and Levi are listed as Jaredites in the Book of Ether. He argues that these are anachronisms, since the Jaredites are supposed to have originated from the time of the Tower of Babel, and did not speak Hebrew.

Perennial ex-Mormon gadfly Richard Packham apparently fails to understand that the Book of Mormon is a translation, and translations render ancient words — including names — into modern forms that didn’t exist at the time.

[Read more…] about Okay, let’s go over this again…

Filed Under: Anti-Mormon critics, Book of Mormon, Joseph Smith, LDS Scriptures

Dispelling the Myth of the “Curse of Cain”

February 28, 2012 by Mike Parker

In connection with Mitt Romney’s Mormon faith, the priesthood ban is getting a lot of attention from the media again.

The most recent turn comes from The Washington Post, where reporter Jason Horowitz interviews Darius Gray and other black Latter-day Saints about their experience with and feelings about the ban. Searching for a theological explanation for the ban, Horowitz contacted BYU associate professor Randy Bott. Horowitz paraphrases Bott:

According to Mormon scriptures, the descendants of Cain, who slew his brother Abel, “were black.” One of Cain’s descendants was Egyptus, a woman Mormons believe was the namesake of Egypt. She married Ham, whose descendants were themselves cursed and, in the view of many Mormons, barred from the priesthood by his father, Noah. Bott points to the Mormon holy text, the Book of Abraham, as suggesting that all of the descendents of Ham and Egyptus were thus black and barred from the priesthood.

Professor Bott’s explanation is an example of how doctrinal folklore continues to be taught by well-meaning members of the Church. Ironically, the dubious “folk doctrine” in question is no longer even relevant, since it was created to explain a Church policy that was reversed nearly thirty-four years ago. [Read more…] about Dispelling the Myth of the “Curse of Cain”

Filed Under: Book of Abraham, LDS Scriptures, News stories, Politics, Racial Issues

Three Mormon Myths About Blacks and the Priesthood

February 25, 2012 by Scott Gordon

February is black history month. Many white members of The Church will say “who cares?” or “good for them!” or even “aren’t they over that yet?” and move on about their daily tasks. That’s unwise. With the presidential election in full swing, our faith and our history of race relations has come under the spotlight of public scrutiny and the intensity will continue to grow. As that happens, I am hopeful that we as members are educated to move the discussion forward instead of saying things that are harmful to the Church and hurtful to many of our members. [Read more…] about Three Mormon Myths About Blacks and the Priesthood

Filed Under: Book of Abraham, Book of Moses, LDS Culture, LDS History, Racial Issues

Bethany Blankley and the “Mormon Question”

December 12, 2011 by Stephen Smoot

Introduction

The great German literary demigod Johann Wolfgang von Goethe once remarked: “There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action.” My reading of Bethany Blankley’s recent Huffington Post article has confirmed Goethe’s fear as being my own. In the doleful cacophony that sounds forth from the ranks of fundamentalist Evangelical critics of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Ms. Blankley is more than suitable at playing first-chair violin. She is an adept Konzertmeisterin who plays with a zealous gusto that is by no means forced into a decrescendo by facts or evidence.

The accusation that Latter-day Saints are not Christians is not new, and it is not it likely to go away anytime soon. So long as fundamentalist Evangelicals dominate the religious landscape of modern America, the benighted Mormons can anticipate this Hydra to rear its ugly heads incessantly. All of the efforts of the Latter-day Saints to quell this tired assertion will almost certainly be in vain, as misinformation, misrepresentation and outright calumny continue to capture the imagination of an ignorant public with scandalous tales of the moral and theological debauchery and baseness of the Mormons. [Read more…] about Bethany Blankley and the “Mormon Question”

Filed Under: Anti-Mormon critics, Apologetics, LDS Scriptures Tagged With: Are Mormons Christian?, Christian, Doctrine, Evangelical critics, Mormon

Mormon FAIR-Cast 62: “A Most Remarkable Book”

November 27, 2011 by SteveDensleyJr

https://media.blubrry.com/mormonfaircast/www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/A-Most-Remarkable-Book.mp3

Podcast: Download (4.6MB)

Subscribe: RSS

In this KSL Radio interview, Religion Today host, Martin Tanner, talks with Tyler Livingston, Stephen Smoot and Mike Ash, some of the producers of the recently released DVD on the Book of Abraham called “A Most Remarkable Book: Evidence for the Divine Authenticity of the Book of Abraham”

This broadcast is posted here by permission of KSL Radio.

Filed Under: Book of Abraham, Podcast

Adam in Ancient Texts and the Restoration

Start Here

Question

What do ancient texts about Adam reveal about the Book of Moses?

Short Answer

Ancient Jewish, Christian, Mandaean, Manichaean, and other traditions preserve teachings about Adam that parallel themes found in the Book of Moses. Matt Roper examines traditions concerning Adam’s premortal existence, divine messengers, agency, sacrifice, repentance, baptism, sacred ordinances, and eventual return to heavenly glory. He argues that these scattered ancient traditions provide meaningful context for evaluating Joseph Smith’s revelations about Adam.

Key Takeaways
  • Ancient traditions expand Adam’s story beyond Genesis, preserving teachings about his premortal existence, heavenly knowledge, and role in God’s plan.
  • Heavenly messengers repeatedly appear in ancient Adam accounts, instructing, warning, testing, and preparing Adam and Eve after the Fall.
  • Sacrifice, repentance, baptism, and sacred ordinances appear in several traditions Roper discusses and parallel important elements of Adam’s story in the Book of Moses.
  • Ancient texts sometimes portray Adam as restored to extraordinary heavenly glory, which Roper compares with Latter-day Saint teachings about Adam’s exaltation and his identity as the Ancient of Days.
  • Roper does not present any single parallel as proof of Joseph Smith’s prophetic claims. Instead, he argues that the accumulated similarities resemble scattered or “broken pieces” of ancient traditions that deserve consideration alongside Restoration scripture.

Summary

Summary

Matthew Roper surveys a wide range of ancient texts and traditions concerning Adam and Eve and compares them with teachings found in Latter-day Saint scripture. These traditions portray Adam as existing before mortality, participating in or having knowledge of the heavenly council, receiving instruction from divine messengers, exercising agency, offering sacrifice, repenting, receiving baptism and ordinances, and ultimately returning to a glorified heavenly state.
Roper argues that these parallels deserve greater attention when evaluating Joseph Smith’s revelations, particularly the Book of Moses. Rather than viewing individual similarities as proof in isolation, he describes ancient traditions as scattered pieces of an older religious story—“broken pieces” that sometimes preserve striking reflections of teachings more fully illuminated by the Restoration.

TL;DR

TL;DR (Too Long; Didn’t Read)

Ancient Jewish, Christian, Mandaean, Manichaean, and other texts preserve traditions about Adam that extend far beyond the biblical Genesis account. Matt Roper compares these traditions with Latter-day Saint scripture, finding parallels involving Adam’s premortal existence, divine messengers, agency, sacrifice, repentance, baptism, ordinances, and heavenly restoration. He argues that these convergences provide important context for understanding Joseph Smith’s revelations about Adam and the Book of Moses.

Adam in Latter-day Saint Revelation

In several early revelations which now constitute the Latter-day Saints’ book of Moses in the Pearl of Great Price, the Prophet Joseph Smith dictated accounts relating to the early biblical patriarchs including Adam.

In contrast to other Christian denominations, Latter-day Saint teachings about Adam go far beyond what is told in the biblical account. They relate how Adam, after his fall, received a knowledge of the future redemption of God’s only Begotten Son and a knowledge, through the ministration of heavenly messengers, of the saving ordinances of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Other Latter-day revelations speak of the elevated role of Adam as head of the human family, not only as father of mortal progeny, but in his standing in the Priesthood. Adam, Joseph Smith taught, “was the first to hold spiritual blessings, to whom was made known the plan of ordinances for the salvation of his posterity unto the end, and to whom Christ was first revealed, and through whom Christ has been revealed from heaven, and will continue to be revealed from henceforth.”1

Known through Latter-day revelation as Michael the archangel in his pre-mortal state, he is described in modern scripture as a “prince” whom God the Father entrusted with “the keys of salvation under the counsel and direction of Holy One” or Jesus Christ.2 Other revelations name him the “ancient of days” spoken of in Daniel chapter 7.3

Adam and the Restoration

In his divinely appointed mission to restore the ancient Gospel and the blessings of the priesthood once held by ancient patriarchs, the Prophet Joseph Smith restored knowledge and authority pertaining to these truths to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

On May 4, 1842, the Prophet Joseph Smith recorded that he instructed early priesthood leaders in the “principles and order of the priesthood,” which in addition to sacred priesthood ordinances included, “setting forth the order pertaining to the ancient of days” or Adam.4

Today, I would like to discuss the figure of the First Man (or Adam) in relation to ancient religious texts and the restoration. In what follows I will survey and identify key themes found in both revealed Latter-day Saint teachings and other ancient texts and beliefs about Adam in ancient Judaism, Christianity and subsequent religious and cultural heirs to those traditions.

With a few exceptions, I will be drawing primarily upon religious texts that were rarely known, not easily accessible, or completely unknown during the lifetime of Joseph Smith.

Preexistence of the First Man

The account of the creation in the Latter-day Saint book Moses teaches the pre-mortal existence of the first man.

For I, the Lord God, created all things, of which I have spoken, spiritually, before the were naturally upon the face of the earth . . . . And I, the Lord God, had created all the children of men; and not yet a man to till the ground; for in heaven created I them; and there was not yet flesh upon the earth, neither in the water, neither in the air . . . . And I the Lord God, formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul, the first flesh upon the earth, the first man also; nevertheless, all things were before created; but spiritually were they created and made according to my word.5

Here in Latter-day Scripture, Adam, the “first man” and in fact, “all the children of men” are said to have been created spiritually in heaven before they were created naturally upon the earth.

The Prophet Joseph Smith taught that Adam obtained the keys of the priesthood “in the Creation, before the world was formed.”6

Other Latter-day Prophets have taught that Adam assisted in the creation or organization of the earth out of unorganized material. “When father Adam came to assist in organizing the earth out of the crude material that was found,” taught Brigham Young, “an earth was made upon which the children of men could live.”7

Ancient Jewish Traditions of Adam’s Preexistence

Some recent scholarship has focused on evidence that the question of Adam’s pre-existence may have been a matter of some controversy in later Judaism.

Here it is important to remember that ancient Judaism was not a monolithic religious entity, but consisted of a variety of competing and sometimes conflicting factions and groups which were often at religious and ideological odds with one another.

The Talmud contains an interesting reference which states, “Our rabbi’s taught: Adam was created [last of all beings] on the eve of Sabbath. Why so? Lest the minim [i.e. heretics] should say: The Holy One, blessed be He, had a partner in His work of creation.”8

In his seminal study, The Name of God and the Angel of the Lord, Jarl Fossum notes that this statement from the Talmud reflects earlier controversy between competing factions of Judaism over the question of the First Man (Adam) and his role in the creation.

More specifically, there were those, who later Jews considered heretics (minim) who held that Adam was God’s “associate” in the creation of the world. This earlier Jewish view of Adam may be reflected in an early midrash which claims that, “God took counsel with the souls of the righteous in creating the universe.”

The Jewish proponent of this belief interpreted the passage in 1 Chronicle 4:23 which speaks of King Solomon’s workers in terms of God as the king of creation, where the pre-existent righteous are said to have been present with God when he oversaw their work under his direction.

The Souls of the Righteous and the Work of Creation

These were the formers and those that dwelt among plantations and hedges; there they were with the King in his work” (1 Chron. iv.23). “These were the formers”: They are termed thus on account of the verse “Then Yhwh Elohim formed man (Gen. Ii.7) “And those that dwell among plantations” corresponds to “And the Lord planted a garden in the east” (Gen. ii.8). “And hedges” corresponds to “I have placed the sand for the bound of the sea” (Jer. v.22). “There they were with the King in his work”: With the supreme King of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, sat the souls of the righteous, with whom he took counsel before creating the world.9

Concerning this passage Fossum states, “The midrash agrees with the rabbinic tradition that God in Gen. i.26 took counsel’ with his agents. But it goes further than the expositions examined above in that it explicitly calls God’s agents makers’,”formers’,with reference to Genesis ii.7.”10

We might also note that the pre-existent righteous with whom God takes counsel are also said to have been already present when God sets the bound of the sea, an event which occurs on the second day of creation in Genesis.

Another midrash states, “Before the world was created, there was none to praise God and know Him. He created the angels and the holy Hayyot, the heavens and their host, and Adam as well. They all were to praise and glorify their Creator.”11

The Heavenly First Man

This tradition of a pre-existent First man (Adam) persisted in Greco-Roman times, where some Jews and Gnostic Christians associated the “light” mentioned in Genesis 1:3 with the pre-existent first man Adam.

This seems to have been based on the fact that Greek word phos in the Septuagint for Genesis could mean both “light” and “man,” (a word play that is not found, however in the Hebrew).

The Gospel of the Egyptians, one of the texts discovered at Nag Hammadi Egypt speaks of “The first man . . . through whom and to whom everything became, (and) without whom nothing became.”12

Fossum states, “In the so-called Nassene Homily summarized by Hyppolytus, the celestial Adamas is said to have brought the chaotic matter to rest in primordial times (see VI.viii.22). Furthermore, it is he who constantly rotates the universe in a circle (see VI.viii.34). Finally, he emits the world ocean which is surrounding the universe (see VI.viii.20).”13

Several so-called Jewish magical texts also portray the first man as pre-existent and as participating in the creation of the cosmos.

In these texts Adam is addressed as “father of the world” a term which in Hellenistic times was synonymous with the creator of the world. He is also described as one who “filled the whole universe with air, who hung up the fire from the [heavenly] water and separated the earth from the water.”14

In another related text, the heavenly Adam is portrayed as possessing the “the powerful name” possessed by God in the creation.15

After surveying numerous early Jewish, Christian and Gnostic traditions about the heavenly man, Fossum concludes, “that when the rabbis had to maintain that Adam was created on the eve of the Sabbath, they were contending against a doctrine of a heavenly man who was pre-existent or had been brought into being on the first day of creation.”

Although found in later Gnosticism, “this doctrine was of Jewish origin.”16

Adam, Job, and the Divine Council

Recent scholarship suggests that some of these Jewish traditions about the Pre-existence of the first man may be traced to the book of Job. There, Job’s friend Eliphaz challenges the suffering man’s claims to wisdom, asking, “Are you the firstborn of the human race? Were you brought forth before the hills? Have you listened in the council of God? And do you limit wisdom to yourself? What do you know that we do not know?” (Job 15:7-9 NRSV).

Eliphaz’ point is that Job cannot lay claim to such heavenly wisdom. Behind his sarcastic challenge, however, rests an understanding that the first man could indeed lay claim to such heavenly wisdom. Several elements in these verses lead to this conclusion.

The First Man “Brought Forth”

First, in contrast to the Genesis account of the creation, the first man in Job is described in the text as having been born or brought forth rather than “created” (Genesis 1:27) or “formed” (Gen 2:7).

In a recent study of the first man mythology in the Book of Job Dexter Callender notes, “In these words of Eliphaz, we learn that the first human was thought to have been born before the hills. The verbal root here is hwl which means to dance or writhe’. It is used in connection with birth imagery, denoting writhing in travail; and hence can render the meaning to bear or bring forth.'”

The meaning of the verb is clear in the parallelism here with yld as in Isaiah 51:2. In other words, “The first human is described as having come into existence through natural means, that is through birth.”17

This usage points to an event which precedes the formation of man from the dust of the earth in Genesis 2:7.

Born “Before the Hills”

Second, the first man in Job 15:7 is said to be born “before the hills,” a term which is also used of the personified figure of wisdom in Proverbs, where personified wisdom is said to have been possessed by God at the beginning, “before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth” (Proverbs 8:25).

In the Genesis account of the creation man’s physical body is created on the sixth day, yet the hills and mountains do not appear until the division of the waters from the dry land on the second day of creation. This suggests a pre-mortal birth and existence for the first man mentioned in Job which precedes the creation of his body on earth and its placement in the Garden of Eden in Genesis chapter 2.

Listening in the Council of God

Third, Eliphaz’ question, “Have you listened in the council of God?” is informed by a context which places the first man in God’s heavenly council where he has access to heavenly wisdom.

“According to Eliphaz, the wisdom of the primordial human came as a result of his presence within the council of God, and the fact that he `listened.'”18

Callender observes that the use of the verbs in this passage may be, “alluding to a particular divine council [cf. Gen. 1:26] in which the plan of creation was revealed” or it may indicate continuing access, meaning “art thou wont to be a listener.”19

The First Man Present at Creation

Fourth, in Job 38-41, the Lord lists various things that Job, as a mortal cannot possibly know, but which God does know by virtue of his wisdom as Creator.

“Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? Declare if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? Or who hath stretched the line upon it? Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? Or who laid the corner stone thereof; When the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy” (Job 38:4-7).

According to Herbert May, “The motif of the First Man, created before the earth appears in Job 15:7, 8 and is also found in Job 38:4-7. . . . In Job 38 the theme is wisdom and knowledge which Job, in contrast with God, does not have; he was not there (as First Man was there) when God laid the foundations of the earth and the members of God’s council (the morning stars, the sons of God) rejoiced.”20

In response to God’s question, Job, as an imperfect mortal would have to admit that he did not know, but the first man could have answered “yes,” since as one with associated with God at the creation he had access to divine wisdom about the creation of the earth.

In fact, as Callender puts it, “The primal human . . . was present at the creation and by virtue of that fact possessed wisdom in its most intimate details. The divine speeches in [Job] chapters 38-41 make clear that the secrets of the universe lie within the primordium, the epoch of creation. As one who `was born then’, he knew the deepest and most esoteric of knowledge.”21

Thus, “In the world-view of the writer of Job and his audience the first human is an exalted being . . . . He is numbered among the sons of God.”22

Foreknowledge of God and the Necessity for a Savior

Another theme found in the ancient literature on Adam is the teaching that God knew before hand that Adam would fall and in Christian literature, the idea that knowing before-hand of man’s future transgression, God would provide a Savior by which man could be saved.

In a Coptic Christian work, the Discourse on the Abbaton, at the creation God sends an angel to retrieve clay from the earth to form man’s body. The earth objects, complaining of the wickedness that will be committed by man if he is created and placed upon the earth.

If thou takest me to Him, He will mould me into a form, and I shall become a man, and a living soul. And very many sins shall come forth from my heart (or, body), and many fornications, ans slanderous abuse, and jealousy, and hatred and contention shall come forth from his hand, and many murders and sheddings of blood shall come forth from his hand…. Let me stay here and go back to the ground and be quiet.23

An Advocate Before Adam Received Life

In spite of the earth’s objections, the angel carries some clay to God for the formation of Adam’s body. After God creates Adam’s body, however, there is a discussion in heaven between the Father and the Son about what to do about man. According to this text:

He left him lying for forty days and forty nights without putting breath into him. And he heaved sighs over him daily saying, “If I put breath into this [man], he must suffer many pains.” And I said unto my Father, “Put breath into him; I will be an advocate for him.” And my Father said unto Me, “If I put breath into him, My Beloved Son, Thou wilt be obliged to go down into the world, and to suffer many pains for him before Thou shalt have redeemed him, and made him come back to his primal state.” And I said unto my Father, “Put breath into him; I will be his advocate, and I will go down into the world, and will fulfil thy command.”24

It is clear from this text that God knows before-hand that man will transgress and that it is necessary to appoint an advocate for man, and that Jesus willingly offered to suffer the pains of man’s redemption, even before man was given life.

Adam in the Garden

Recent studies by Michael Stone, W. Lipscomb, Gary Anderson and others have focused on a set of Armenian Christian Adam and Eve texts. These texts were first published in Armenian in 1898 and only in English in the last several decades.25

These texts discuss the events which took place in the Garden of Eden before the Fall. In one of these entitled, Adam and Eve and the Incarnation, the serpent tells Eve, “God was a man like you. When he ate of the fruit of this tree he became God of all”26

In The History of the Creation and Transgression of Adam, the serpent states, “God was like you, because he had not eaten of that fruit, When he ate it, he attained the glory of divinity.”

Speaking of devil’s words to Eve, Michael Stone, the editor and translator of the recently published Armenian and Georgian Adam and Eve texts observes, “The formulation in our text says not just that humans will become like God (gods)” but also that “God was himself originally human and became divine through eating the fruit.”27

This variation on the serpent’s words is also found in several later medieval Jewish texts about Adam and Eve.28

In the Transgression of Adam, after Eve partakes of the fruit, Adam asks her, “Why have you eaten the fruit?” Eve responds by saying, “The fruit is very sweet. Take and you taste, and notice the sweetness of this fruit” but Adam refuses, saying, ‘I cannot taste it.”

According to this particular account Eve the begins to cry and beg Adam to eat and “do not separate me from you.” After some deliberation (three hours according to one account) Adam reasons, “It is better for me to die than to become separated and detached from this woman.” Then he partakes of the fruit as well.

Adam’s Restoration and Deification

These and other extra-canonical texts indicate that after the redemption of Christ that Adam would be taken to paradise and that after the resurrection he would be restored to his former inheritance which he had lost at the Fall.

The significance here is that Adam’s restoration to his pre-mortal inheritance, where according to these texts he once reigned under God as a king and at God’s specific command was even worshiped by the angels, suggests a return to a state where he could again receive such adoration, a state clearly suggestive of deification.

The theme of deification in fact is explicit in the Syriac Testament of Adam. There Adam explains to his son Seth that God would eventually fulfil Adam’s desire for deification. Just before being cast out of the Garden, the Lord tells him, “Adam, Adam, do not fear. You wanted to be a god; I will make you a god, not right now, but after the space of many years.”

For your sake I will taste death and enter into the house of the dead…. And after three days, while I am in the tomb, I will raise up the body I received from you. And I will set you at the right hand of my divinity, and I will make you a god just like you wanted.”*

Opposition and Agency

According to the Doctrine and Covenants, the devil was allowed to tempt Adam and Eve in order that they could become agents unto themselves, “for if they never should have bitter they could not know the sweet” (D&C 29:39; see also Moses 6:55).

In the Discourse on Abbaton, Satan tells Eve, ye shall not surely die, but ye shall be like unto these gods, ye shall know the good and the evil, and ye shall [be able] to separate the sweet from the bitter.”29

After Adam and Eve partake of the fruit the Lord tells them that they will experience opposites during their mortality, “You shall hunger and you shall be sated and you shall be afflicted by bitterness then you shall eat of sweetness; you shall be tormented by heat and afflicted by cold; you shall be pauperized and become great; you shall grow fat and you will be weakened.”30

According to another text, their eyes being now opened, Adam identifies their antagonist: “It is that Lucifer… and so we will be henceforth and forever subject to hardships and numerous diseases.”31

In the Book of Moses Eve realizes after receiving further instruction in the plan of salvation, “Were it not for our transgression we never should have had seed, and never should have known good and evil, and the joy of our redemption, and the eternal life which God giveth to the obedient” (Moses 5:11).

The Book of Mormon indicates that the fall was a necessary pre-requisite for having children (2 Nephi 2:23). In this connection there is an interesting commentary in the Zohar relating to the curse placed upon Eve after partaking of the fruit.

“Why,” says the Zohar, ” is the Serpent necessary in this connection? It is because it is he who opens the passage for the descent of souls into the world. For if he did not open the way, no soul would come down to animate man’s body in the world.”32

The Covenant to Provide a Savior

In the Conflict of Adam and Eve, first published in English in 1882, God repeatedly reminds Adam of the covenant God had made with him in the Garden of Eden, before he was driven out, that he would provide a Savior, the Word of God for them after 5500 years.

But God had before that made this covenant with our father Adam, in the same terms, ere he came out of the garden, [when he was] by the tree whereof Eve took [the fruit] and gave it him to eat. Inasmuch as, when our father Adam came out of the garden, he passed by that tree and saw how God had changed the appearance of it into another form, and how it withered. And as Adam went to it he feared, trembled and fell down; but God in his mercy lifted him up, and then made this covenant with him.33

In another text, the Lord reproves Adam for his disobedience. Adam desired to partake of the fruit of the tree of life in his sinful state, but the Lord informs him that he is forbidden to partake of it in his lifetime.

Instead, he gives Adam a charge to obtain from sin: “Rather, when you go out of the Garden, guard yourself from slander, from harlotry, from adultery, from sorcery, from the love of money, from avarice and from all sins.” If he does this, he will eventually be able to partake from the tree of life after the resurrection from the dead.34

The Agency of Adam

In the book of Moses when God commands Adam not to partake of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, he adds, “nevertheless, thou mayest choose for thyself, for it is given unto thee” (Moses 3:17).

Other ancient texts related to Adam and Eve also address the question of man’s agency. In the Second Book of Enoch God says, “And I gave him his free will; and I pointed out to him the two ways – light and darkness. And I said to him, `This is good for you, but that is bad’; so that I might come to know whether he has love toward me or abhorrence, and so that it might become plain who among his race loves me.”35

In the Apocalypse of Shadrach, the prophet asks God, since he knew beforehand that man would transgress, why did he not force man to obey or “hold his foot” as it were by keeping him from transgression.

God responds, If I hold his foot, he says, You have given me no grace in the world,’ and so I left him to his own desires because I loved him and thus I sent my righteous angels to watch him night and day.”36

While most Adam and Eve texts portray his choice to partake of the fruit as a mistake, the Christian Epistula Apostulorum seems to view that choice positively, “Adam was given power that he might choose what he wanted from the two [righteousness and sin]; and he chose the light and stretched out his hand and took (it) and left the darkness and withdrew from it. Likewise every man is given the ability to believe in the light.”

Adam and the Angels

Although not found in the Biblical account, Latter-day Saint scripture and other ancient texts tell how the first couple were visited by heavenly messengers sent from God. Alma taught that after the Fall of Adam and Eve, God, “sent angels to converse with them, who caused men to behold his glory” (Alma 12:29).

The Prophet Mormon also taught that the Lord “sent angels to minister unto the children of men, to make manifest concerning the coming of Christ; and in Christ there should come every good thing . . . .Wherefore, by the ministering of angels, and by every word which proceeded forth out of the mouth of God, men began to exercise faith in Christ” (Moroni 7:22-25).

In the Doctrine and Covenants God states, “I, the Lord God, gave unto Adam and unto his seed, that they should not die as to the temporal death, until I, the Lord God, should send forth angels to declare unto them repentance and redemption, through faith on the name of mine Only Begotten Son. And thus did I, the Lord God, appoint unto man the days of his probation–that by his natural death he might be raised in immortality unto eternal life, even as many as would believe” (D&C 29:42-43).

The account of Adam and his family in the book of Moses recounts the ministration of other heavenly messengers as well (Moses 5:6). Not only angelic messengers, but God himself is said to have spoken to Adam directly. “And thus the Gospel began to be preached, from the beginning, being declared by holy angels sent forth from the presence of God, and by his own voice, and by the gift of the Holy Ghost” (Moses 5:58).

Angels Instruct Adam and Eve

The Penance of Adam says that after the fall, “angels came from God every day to speak to Adam and to instruct him for a period of nineteen days.”37

Some of these texts explain how Adam and Eve, finding themselves unprepared for mortal life were instructed by angels in how to deal with basic needs.

In the History of the Repentance of Adam and Eve, five days after being cast out of the garden, “on the sixth day, the archangel Gabriel came to them at the command of God. And seeing Adam and Eve lamenting and weeping, he comforted them and told them to eat from the fruit of the earth, which was near to them.”38

The Jewish Life of Adam and Eve says, “The Lord God sent various seeds by the angel Michael and gave them to Adam and showed him how to work and till the ground so as to have produce by which they and all their generations might live.”39

In the Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan, an angel from God teaches Adam and Eve how to make garments out of animal skins. Adam and Eve, however do not know how to make clothing.

“Then God sent his angel to show them how to work it out. And the angel said to Adam, `Go forth, and bring some palm thorns.’ Then Adam went out, and brought some, as the angel had commanded him. Then the angel began before them to work out the skins, after the manner of one who prepares a shirt. And he took the thorns and stuck them into the skins, before their eyes. Then the angel again stood up and prayed to God that the thorns in those skins should be hidden, so as to be, as it were, sewn with one thread. And so it was by God’s order; they became garments for Adam and Eve, and He clothed them withal.”40

The same text relates how angels also protected Adam and Eve from attempts by Satan and his angels to destroy them,41 and how angels taught the first couple how to prepare for marriage and then, at God’s command, marry them.42

Angels Comfort Adam and Eve

In the Latin, Armenian and Georgian versions of the Life of Adam and Eve, angels also administer comfort to Adam and Eve.

When Eve prepares to give birth for the very first time Adam, seeing her labor pains fears that she might die, “Adam prayed and spoke a plea to God on her behalf and the Lord hearkened to him. And behold twelve angels and two powers came from heaven.”

One of the angels lays his hand on Eve and blesses her, saying, “Blessed are you, Eve, because of Adam, the elect one and servant of God, for his prayers are great before God and, because of him, God will deliver you.”43

After Cain murdered Abel the Lord comforted the first couple and sent them news of the future birth of Seth.44

Angels Warn and Teach

Other texts relate how God sends angels teach and instruct and sometimes warn Adam and Eve. In the Life of Adam and Eve, when Eve has a dream where she sees Cain killing Abel, God sends an angel to Adam warning him to keep that mystery a secret and not tell Cain that they know of this.45

The Mandaean Book of John tells how God sent an angel to Adam to bring him knowledge of his heavenly home.

“At the call of the Envoy Adam awoke, who was lying there. Adam, who was lying there awoke and went up to the Envoy: Come in peace, o Envoy, Ambassador of Life, who art come from the House of my Father”

The messenger then tells Adam, who is lamenting his fallen state, to cheer up, reminding him of his beautiful heavenly throne which awaits him in heaven.

“I have come and shall instruct thee, Adam, and redeem thee from this World. Hearken and hear and be instructed and ascend victoriously up to the Place of Light.’ Adam heard and became a believer.-Hail to him who hears after thee and who believes . . . . Adam gazed up full of hope and ascended.-Hail to him who after thee ascends.”46

In the the Conflict of Adam and Eve the Word of God, meaning Christ, often speaks to the first couple and when the devil wounds or attacks them, heals them and raises them from the brink of death.

False Angels and Deception

The Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan tells how the adversary frequently tried to destroy them. When he cannot kill them outright he seeks to deceive them by imitating the true angels sent from God.

After Adam and Eve were cast out of the Garden, “Satan came to the cave, clad in a garment of light, and girt about with a bright girdle. In his hands was a staff of light, and he looked most awful: but his face was pleasant and his speech was sweet.”47

On another occasion, “He gathered together his host, and came in appearance upon a cloud, intent on deceiving them.”48

In the Armenian Christian Penitence of Adam account Adam prays, “Make this enemy of mine distant from me, who desires to lead me astray, I who am searching for the light that I have lost.”49

In the Conflict of Adam and Eve, while they were worshiping God in prayer, Satan and his angels appear in light and radiance at the mouth of Adam’s cave. “He began by transforming his hosts; in his hands was a flashing fire, and they were in a great light.”50

Adam, who senses that something is wrong prayed to God, asking, “O Lord, is there in the world another God than Thou…. If they are of some other God than Thou, tell me; and if they are sent by Thee, inform me of the reason for which thou hast sent them.”

An angel then appears to identify Satan and drive him away.51

Three Heavenly Messengers

Sometimes Adam and Eve are visited by three heavenly messengers. In the Apocalypse of Adam, the first couple are visited by three angels who awaken him and teach them about their origins and give them knowledge of the practice of baptism. Adam later passes on this knowledge to his son Seth and their descendants.52

These three angels are also found in the Mandaean Adam and Eve stories, where Manda dHaiye, a kind of angelic Redeemer figure, sends three kingly angelic messengers, called “uthras” to teach Adam and Eve the rituals which are necessary for this life and which will help them to ascend back to the place where God the “Great Life” dwells.

Kurt Rudolph notes that the fundamental mission of these messengers of light to “instruct the faithful and redeem their souls.”53

The leader Manda dHaiye whose name means the “Son of the Life” and who personifies redemptive knowledge oversees the activities of the three, who in Mandaean traditions are called Hibil, Sitil and Anos. These three function under his direction and are said to have appeared to Adam and other notable prophet figures of the past to reveal saving knowledge and sacred Mandaean rituals.

“They are,” to quote one authority, “mythological figures who appear in particular generations and merely repeat the `primeval revelation’ made to Adam.”54 They reveal to each generation, what was first and originally revealed to Adam in the beginning.

Wilford Woodruff and Three Messengers

The Prophet Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery testified that Peter James and John visited them and bestowed upon them the keys of the Melchizedek Priesthood. On October 18, 1840, while serving an apostolic mission in London, Wilford Woodruff recorded in his journal,

We retired to rest in good season & I felt well in my mind & slept untill 12 at night. I awoke and meditated upon the things of God untill near 3 oclock & while forming a determination to warn the people of London & overcome the powers of Darkness by the assistance of God; A person appeared unto me which I considered was the Prince of Darkness or the Devel. He made war with me & attempted to take my life. He caught me by the throat & choked me nearly to death. He wounded me in my forhead. I also wounded him in a number of places in the head. As he was about to overcome me I prayed to the father in the name of Jesus for help. I then had power over him & he left me though much wounded. 3 personage dressed in white Came to me & prayed with me & I was immediately healed & delivered from all my troubles.55

In later descriptions of this episode President Woodruff indicated that these three angels were dressed in the “robes of immortal beings”56 or “temple clothing”57 although he did not know who they were.58

Three Angels and False Messengers

In the Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan, the Lord sends three angels, Michael, Gabriel and Raphael to Adam and bestow upon him gifts of gold, frankincense and myrrh, which Christ taught them were symbolic of God’s kingship, suffering and death.59

Later, in one of his many attempt to deceive Adam, Satan and two other devils disguise themselves as angels of God in imitation of the three holy angels who had previously brought Adam these gifts.

On this occasion Adam incorrectly believed that these three were the same angels who visited him before. “Because, when they came to Adam the first time, there came upon him from them, peace and joy, through their bringing him good tokens; so Adam thought that they were come a second time to give him other tokens for him to rejoice withal . . . . So when Adam heard these words he believed them, and said to these angels, “Speak the word of God, that I may receive it.”

And Satan said unto him, “Swear, and promise me that thou wilt receive it.” Then Adam said, “I know not how to swear and promise.” And Satan said to him, “Hold out thy hand, and put it inside my hand.” Then Adam held out his hand, and put it into Satan’s hand.

In this story, Adam and Eve are not married yet. So when Satan commands Adam to have sexual relations with Eve, Adam realizes that these are not angel from God and says, “But God never spoke the words thou hast told me; and ye are not God’s angels, nor yet sent from Him. But ye are devils, come to me under the false appearance of angels. Away from me; ye cursed of God! And those devils fled from before Adam.”60

Testing Messengers

In the Manichaean Psalm Book, discovered in 1930, there is a hymn which recounts how God sends an angel to the “First Man” in order to bring him the good news of his redemption.

“Gather and come o sons of man, and hear the Envoy that was sent with the news of the skies . . . . Lo, the news-bearer has been sent with the news of the Land of Light to tell us the news of the skies. He was sent, he came hurrying and rejoicing to the First Man, that [he] might tell him the news. He came and knocked at the gates and cried, `Open quickly that I may tell you the news of [the skies]. Rise up, o First Man, open thy gates that are shut that I may tell thee the news. Rise up o beloved ones, that I may tell thee the news.”61

Before he is willing to receive the message, however, the First Man must be convinced that he is a true messenger, “Who art thou, for my doors are shut? Give a sign that I may open to thee and thou tell me the news.”62

Convinced that this is a true messenger from heaven, the First Man now excitedly asks, “Tell me the news. What does my Father do, the Father of the Lights? . . . . What do the Twelve Aeons do, whom I left surrounding the Father. Tell [me] the news”63 “What does the Mother of the Living do, whom I left, and her brethren also? Tell the news”64

The messenger responds, “Let us go, they await thee, they are on the border (?), they expect thee. Lo, God has wholly come: do thou call, he will answer thee. Lo, they that shall help thee await thee, their hands are spread to embrace thee.”

The text the concludes, “They helped the First Man, he cried before him in joy . . . Great is the joy that there was, the First Man being in their midst, laden with garlands and palms . . . . May we be counted among those of the right hand and inherit our kingdom. Lo, this is the news. And may we live with our kinsmen from everlasting to everlasting.”65

Adam and the Ordinances

The Genesis account tells us very little about the lives of Adam and Eve after their expulsion from the garden. Latter-day Saint scripture, however, teaches that Adam also received authority from God to administer and participate in the ordinances of the Gospel.

Alma taught that beginning with Adam, “priests were ordained after the order of his Son, in a manner that thereby the people might know in what manner to look forward to the Son for redemption” (Alma 13:2) and that it was through these priesthood ordinances that the children of God could become sanctified and enter into the Lord’s presence and rest (Alma 13:10-13).

The Book of Moses relates that after being cast out of the garden that Adam and Eve began to till the earth, “And Adam and Eve, his wife, called upon the name of the Lord” (Moses 5:4). This was a regular practice for we are also told that, “Adam and Eve, his wife, ceased not to call upon God” (Moses 5:16).

Prayer and Ordinances in Ancient Adam Texts

Similarly, in the Conflict of Adam and Eve, finding themselves in a world of hardship and danger, the first couple sought refuge in a cave, “Then Adam and Eve entered the cave, and stood praying, in their own tongue, unknown to us, but which they knew well.”66

According to this text they prayed daily and frequently, “After this Adam and Eve ceased not to stand in the cave, praying and weeping until the morning dawned upon them.67

A recently published Manichaean text discovered in Turfan China during the last century says that God appeared to Adam and taught him about Salvation and that he, “believed in the message” and that, “He eagerly accepted all the commandments, ordinances and seals of virtue, like a mighty hero; he put off the mortal body and was redeemed eternally. He was lifted up to Paradise, to the realms of the blessed.”68

Adam and Sacrifice and a Foreknowledge of the Savior’s Redemption

In the book of Moses, after being shut out from God’s presence because of their transgression, God sometimes spoke to them by his own voice.

And he gave unto them commandments, that they should worship the Lord their God, and should offer the firstlings of their flocks, for an offering unto the Lord. And Adam was obedient unto the commandments of the Lord. And after many days an angel of the Lord appeared unto Adam, saying: Why dost thou offer sacrifices unto the Lord? And Adam said unto him: I know not, save the Lord commanded me. And then the angel spake, saying: This thing is a similitude of the sacrifice of the Only Begotten of the Father, which is full of grace and truth. Wherefore, thou shalt do all that thou doest in the name of the Son, and thou shalt repent and call upon God in the name of the Son forevermore. And in that day the Holy Ghost fell upon Adam, which beareth record of the Father and the Son, saying: I am the Only Begotten of the Father from the beginning, henceforth and forever, that as thou hast fallen thou mayest be redeemed, and all mankind, even as many as will (Moses 5:5-9).

According to the Jewish book of Jubilees, “And on the day when Adam went out of the garden of Eden he offered a sweet-smelling sacrifice-frankincense, galbanum, stacte, and spices.”69

According to a second century Jewish text attributed to Rabbi Nathan, having been cast out of the garden into a world of darkness Adam rejoiced when he first saw the sun rise. To give thanks he offered sacrifice.

“He arose and built altars and brought an ox whose horns extended beyond its hoofs; and he offered it up as a burnt offering . . . At that time three groups of ministering angels came down, and in their hands were lutes and lyres and all kinds of musical instruments. And they sang the song of praise with Adam.”70

Sacrifice in the Conflict of Adam and Eve

The early Christian Conflict of Adam and Eve, portrays the first couple as completely unaccustomed to deal with the difficulties of life in a mortal condition. In their sorrow and fear at having been cast into a dark and perilous world they kill themselves.

In this account, the Word of God (Christ) then comes and restores them to life and teaches them that they should not try to kill themselves again, but must learn to cope with their mortal condition and that all their self-inflicted injury will not save them or allow them to be restored to their former state of happiness in paradise.

Adam and Eve stood on their feet; and Adam said to Eve, “Gird thyself, and I will also gird myself.” And she girded herself as Adam told her. Then Adam and Eve took stones and placed them in the shape of an altar; and they took leaves from the trees outside the garden, with which they wiped, from the face of the rock, the blood they had spilled. But that which had dropped on the sand, they took together with the dust [wherewith it was mingled] and offered it upon the altar as an offering unto God. Then Adam and Eve stood under the altar and wept, thus entreating God, “Forgive us our trespass and our sin, and look upon us with Thine eye of mercy.”71

God is then said to have responded to their prayer.

Then came the Word of God to Adam, and said unto him, “O Adam, as thou hast shed thy blood, so will I shed My own blood when I become flesh of thy seed; and as thou didst die, O Adam, so also will I die. And as thou didst build an altar, so also will I make for thee an altar on the earth; and as thou didst offer thy blood upon it, so also will I offer My blood upon an altar on the earth. And as thou didst sue for forgiveness through that blood, so also will I make My blood forgiveness of sins, and blot out transgressions in it. And now, behold, I have accepted thy offering, O Adam, but the days of the covenant, wherein I have bound thee, are not fulfilled. When they are fulfilled, then will I bring thee back into the garden. Now, therefore, strengthen thy heart; and when sorrow comes upon thee, make Me an offering, and I will be favourable to thee” ….This, then, was the first offering Adam made unto God; and so it became his custom to do.72

The Offering of Corn

On another occasion the Lord miraculously provides corn for Adam and Eve. In thanks for this heavenly gift

Adam and Eve took of the corn, and made of it an offering, and took it and offered it up on the mountain, the place where they had offered up their first offering of blood. And they offered this oblation again on the altar they had built at first. And they stood up and prayed, and besought the Lord saying, “Thus O God, when we were in the garden, did our praises go up to Thee like this offering…. But now, O God, accept this offering from us, and turn us not back, reft of thy mercy.”

In response to this act

God said to Adam and Eve, “Since ye have made this oblation and have offered it to Me, I shall make it my flesh, when I come down upon earth to save you; I shall cause it to be offered continually upon an altar, for forgiveness and for mercy, unto those who partake of it duly.” And God sent a bright fire upon the offering of Adam and Eve, and filled it with brightness, grace, and light; and the Holy Ghost came down upon that oblation…. And the souls of Adam and Eve were brightened, and their hearts were filled with joy and gladness and with the praises of God. And God said to Adam, “This shall be unto you a custom, to do so, when affliction and sorrow come upon you. . . . Adam rejoiced at these words which he heard from God; and he and Eve worshiped before the altar.73

Adam later makes it a practice to make offerings at the birth of his children and teaches them to continue this practice.74

Repentance

The book of Moses teaches that angels taught Adam and Eve the Gospel. “And the Lord God called upon men by the Holy Ghost everywhere and commanded them that they should repent; and as many as believed in the Son, and repented of their sins, should be saved; and as many as believed not and repented not, should be damned; and the words went forth out of the mouth of God in a firm decree; wherefore they must be fulfilled” (Moses 5:14-15).

After Adam has repented, the Lord tell him, “Behold, I have forgiven thee thy transgression in the Garden of Eden” (Moses 6:53).

There are many Jewish, Christian and Muslim traditions which describe the repentance of Adam and Eve. In the Life of Adam and Eve, the first man and woman are sorrowful over their transgression and pray for God’s forgiveness while standing in the water of the Jordan river for many days.75

In the Conflict of Adam and Eve, the first couple frequently repent and ask God’s forgiveness.76

Gabriel Teaches Adam Repentance

In Muslim traditions recorded by Al Kisai, God in heaven tells the angel Gabriel to inform Adam of the principle of repentance. “I have decreed that my mercy shall reach all who call upon me truly repentant of their sins and making humble entreaty. These are the words I have designated for Adam so that he may have repentance to lead him from darkness into light. Descend therefore to him, Gabriel, and give him my greetings. Wipe away his tears and teach him these words.”

This text goes on to say, “Gabriel took the words from his Lord and, surrounded by his great light, descended with them to Adam.” After receiving the message from Gabriel Adam repents and is then told, “Peace be with you Adam. Your repentance has been accepted, and your transgression is forgiven.”77

“When Adam prayed with these words, he was told, `Adam, thou art truly my friend, for I have forgiven thee thy transgression. Ask and it shall be given thee.'”78

“When Adam spoke thus, his voice was carried to the distant horizons; and the earth, the mountains and the trees set up a great clamor saying, `Adam, God has given you relief and has blessed you through your repentance.'”78

“When Adam had accomplished his prostration he was told, Lift up thy head.’ When he lifted up his face, the veil of light was raised, the gates of heaven were opened to him, and a voice cried out announcing repentance and absolution. Adam,’ he was told, `God has accepted your repentance!'”78

Repentance and Forgiveness for Adam and Eve

On another occasion some of the angels chide Adam for having fallen from Paradise.

“Leave Adam alone!’ Gabriel said to the angels. Censure him no more for his transgression, for God has erased his sins.’ . . . . Gabriel then struck the earth with his wings, and a spring gushed forth more redolent than musk and sweeter than honey. As Adam bathed himself in that water, he said, Praise be to God for this water and for every condition. O God, purify me from my transgression and relieve me of my anxiety.’ Gabriel clothed him with two robes of heavenly brocade. To Eve God sent Michael, and he gave her the glad tidings of repentance and forgiveness and garbed her: She said, Praise to God for his excellence and sanction.’ When she learned that her repentance had been accepted, she removed herself to the seashore and bathed herself and said, `Has not God accepted my repentance?”79

In another Mandaean document the heavenly messenger says, “I am the messenger of light, whom the Great One sent into this world. The true messenger (kustana) am I, in whom there is no falsehood, The true one (kustana), in whom there is no falsehood, in whom there is no imperfection or deficiency. I am the messenger of light. . . . Whoever repents, his soul shall not be cut off (from the light), and the lord will not cut him off (or: damn him).’ But the wicked ones, the liars, cut themselves off (from the light), for it was manifest to them, and they would not see, and they were called, and they would not listen or believe” (227-230).

Baptism

Latter-day Saint scripture recounts how Adam was commanded by God to repent and be baptized.

And it came to pass, when the Lord had spoken with Adam, our father, that Adam cried unto the Lord, and he was caught away by the Spirit of the Lord, and was carried down into the water, and was laid under the water, and was brought forth out of the water. And thus he was baptized, and the Spirit of God descended upon him, and thus he was born of the Spirit, and became quickened in the inner man.

And he heard a voice out of heaven, saying: Thou art baptized with fire, and with the Holy Ghost. This is the record of the Father, and the Son, from henceforth and forever; And thou art after the order of him who was without beginning of days or end of years, from all eternity to all eternity. Behold, thou art one in me, a son of God; and thus may all become my sons.80

While the Bible gives no indication that Adam was ever baptized, other ancient Jewish, Christian and later Mandaean texts discuss his baptism. In some accounts Adam is baptized after death before he can enter paradise of heaven. In other accounts, as in the Latter-day Saint Book of Moses, Adam is baptized while in mortality.

According to the early Syrian Father Ephraem, “In baptism Adam found again-that glory that was among the trees of Eden.-He went down, and received it out of the water;-he put it on, and went up and was adorned therein . . . Man fell in the midst of Paradise,-and in baptism compassion restored him . . . . They clothed themselves with leaves of necessity;-but the Merciful had pity on their beauty,-and instead of leaves of trees, -He clothed them with glory in the water”81

Adam’s Baptism in Mandaean Tradition

One interesting account can be found in the Canonical Prayerbook of the Mandaeans. In Mandaean teaching an Hibil-Ziwa, an uthra or angel was sent from God to teach Adam and baptize him.

“This is the baptism wherewith Adam the first man was baptized by Hibil-Ziwa . . . . Any man who has strength thereto and who loveth his soul, let him come and go down into the jordan, be baptized, receive the pure sign, put on robes of radiant light and set a fresh wreath upon his head.’ And Adam descended into the jordan and submerged himself thrice.”

When Adam came up out of the water the heavenly messnger took him by the right hand. “And he grasped his hand in kusta and seated him before him and recited the sealing prayers . . . . This is the limit) (end) of the baptism which came into this world, the (baptism) wherewith Hibil-Ziwa baptized Adam and first man and it was preserved in the ages for the elect righteous for it was written down in the scroll.”82

In Mandaean Book of Adam, called the Ginza an angel teaches Adam the way back to his heavenly home, “When he [Adam] heard this from him he was overjoyed. He himself had brought him hither and (now) he became his guide to the other world. He undressed him (and) clothed him with his garment, he escorted him, made him ascend, and set him up in the House of the Mighty (Life). He took him by the right hand and put him in charge of his own treasurers.”83

Adam and the Return Home

Among the Mandaeans the act of kushta (“truth”) was the exchange of right hands in a truthful oath and held great religious significance. In one of their books the heavenly beings state, “Consider the great sign which is called `the mighty kusta’…Any man who doth not recognize this sign and detracts from it’s noble distinction, alienates himself from us and we will not set him in our abode.

“But a man who hath recognized this, and who distinguisheth, knoweth, enquireth, and investigateth, and can tell the divine from trash…night from day, life from death, evil from good, sweet from bitter, and right from left, he hath discernment.”84

Both the Ginza, the Mandaean book of Adam and the Canonical Prayer-Book of the Mandaeans describes how, upon death, the soul, leaving behind her mortal body, will ascend to the heavenly world of Light from which she originally came.

As she ascends through the heavenly spheres the soul must pass through a series of gates or “watch-houses” where the soul is detained and questioned and where the souls of the wicked and unprepared are punished. As it successfully passes each watch-house the soul dons a series of sacred vestments at each successful passage.

“Garment on garment she putteth on, she arrayed herself in robe after robe . . . . She laugheth, rejoiceth, leapeth for joy, danceth, exulteth, and is overjoyed about the glorious splendor resting (upon her) and the glory that accrueth to her.”85

Abathur and the Heavenly Passage

This text continues, “And on she went and reached Abathur’s house of detention, (Abathur), the Ancient, Lofty, Holy and Guarded one.” Abathur is a powerful angel who guards the entrance into paradise.

“There his scales are set up and spirits and souls are questioned before him as to their names, their signs, their blessing, their baptism and everything that is therewith.”86

According to a Mandaean commentary, this portion of the liturgy refers to “the four ritual handclasps which Abatur seeks to exchange with the soul.”87

Each of these four are associated with separate ritual acts accompanied by a solemn oath, “The first Kusta is a precious kusta; it is the promise made at baptism . . . . The second kusta is a lofty kusta: it is the oath (taken at) coronation; no (earthly) king hath more majesty)!

“The third kusta is a loving one, it is the vow taken at espousal): there is no love like it. The fourth kusta is a powerful kusta for it traveleth to (the other) world. It came, it went, and it opened the door to the world.

“Every man who hath performed these kustas is thereby made perfect, he hath been put to the test by all the worlds and will rise upward and behold the Place of Light.”88

What Was Revealed to Adam

All this in Mandaean tradition was revealed to Adam by divine messengers sent from God to teach him. In the Ginza Manda Haiya tells how messengers were sent to Adam to reveal the proper way to worship.

“When I installed Adam I appointed three uthras over him. I set myself at the head of the uthras whom I set over Adam and Eve. I stood before them and taught them wonderful hymns. I instructed them in the ritual books so that they might perform the masiqtas (after the manner) of the uthras.

“I taught them prayers so that they might be confirmed through the prayers of the Life. I said to them: `You are set up and confirmed in the place where the good are confirmed. Between the manas of light you shall be confirmed.

“I brought myself forward and instructed them, as a teacher does his pupils. I conversed with them and blessed them, and the blessing of the good ones shall rest upon them. Adam, his sons, and his generation shall behold the Place of Light.”89

In the book of Moses it says that through the ministry of God and angels, “all things were confirmed unto Adam by an holy ordinance” (Moses 5:58).

Adam and Eve Exalted in Heaven

Latter-day revelation says, concerning Adam, that the Lord, established his feet, and set him upon high” (D&C 78:16).

Early convert and pioneer Zebedee Coltrin described a vision he and others shared with the Prophet Joseph Smith in which they saw Adam and Eve exalted in heaven, “The heavens gradually opened, and they saw a golden throne, on a circular foundation, something like a light house, and on the throne were two ages personages, having white hair, and clothed in white garments.

“They were the two most beautiful and perfect specimens of mankind he ever saw. Joseph said, `They are our first parents, Adam and Eve.’ Adam was a broad-shouldered man, and Eve as a woman, was large in proportion.”90

Adam Exalted and Glorified

The Colon Mani Codex, discovered in 1969, contains a series of previously unknown visions attributed to several of the early biblical patriarchs. The document quotes from a vision attributed to Adam in which an angel appears to Adam and leads causes him to ascend into heaven where he is exalted and glorified.

Adam is told by the angel, “Therefore receive (and) write these things just as I reveal them to you on exceedingly clean papyrus which is unspoiled and which has not been harbored by worms.”91

Several scholars who have published studies of this codex believe that the name by which this angel identifies himself, Balsomas, may be based upon a Hebrew expression literally meaning “possessor of the (divine) Name,” making him the equivalent of the angel of the Lord in Exodus 23:20-23.92

This Adam text also says,

Moreover there were many other things which he revealed to him in the vision. Very great was the glory that surrounded him. He beheld […] angels an[d high offic]ials and mig[hty powers] … (5 lines lost) … Adam and was made superior to all the powers and angels of creation. Many other similar things to these are in his writings.93

Adam Restored to His Former Position

In a recent study, John Reeves explains that the Adam text describes an “ascent experience” apparently facilitated by the angel in which Adam is taken up to the heavens where “a transformation of Adam’s human status is reported wherein he `was made superior to all the powers and angels,'” suggesting “a divine restoration to Adam of the position he enjoyed among the heavenly entities prior to his disobedience in the Garden.”94

Jarl Fossum has also published evidence from other Jewish texts for the idea “that Adam fell as a consequence of trying to become like God, but then repented and was raised by God and given the Divine Name.”95

This “hidden Name in Adam’s possession” was in these texts, “The Name possessed by the heavenly Man” and “is here represented as a cosmological power holding the universe together. . . . There can be no doubt that the `Hidden Name’ in Adam’s possession is . . . the Name peculiar to God which was generally kept secret.”96

Adam’s Glory in Heaven

In the Apocalypse of Paul, the apostle is shown and introduced to the prophets and saints who are in heaven, including Mary, the mother of Jesus, Jacob and his twelve sons, Moses, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Job, Noah, Elijah and Elisha, Zacharias and John the Baptist.

Afterwards Paul says, “And I looked and saw another who surpassed them all, very beautiful. And I said to the angel: Who is this my lord? He said to me: This is Adam, the father of you all. When he came up to me, he greeted me with joy.”97

What is interesting is that the text describes Adam as surpassing the other prophets and saints in glory and beauty in his post-mortal state in heaven.

The Wisdom of Solomon says that personified wisdom, “preserved the first formed father of the world [Adam], that was created alone, and brought him out of his fall, and gave him power to rule all things.”98

In the Life of Adam and Eve and the Book of the Rolls, God promises Adam that one day he will be restored to his former glory.

On that day God says, “I will turn his sorrow into joy, Then he shall sit upon the throne of him who overthrew him.”99

The Book of the Rolls explains that before his fall, “Adam was king, priest, and prophet.”100

After his fall he is told, “Adam! Do not grieve, for I will restore thee to thine inheritance, out of which thy rebellion has brought thee.”101 That is, he will be restored as a king and a priest.

Adam at the Gates of Paradise

In the Testament of Abraham, the father of the faithful is taken before the gates of Paradise and Hell. There he sees two gates, a narrow one which leads to paradise and a broad gate which leads to the other place, “And outside the two gates of that place they saw a man seated on a golden throne. And the appearance of the man was terrifying, like, like the Master’s.”

According to Abraham, whenever this glorious and enthroned figure saw men and women going through the broad gate he wept, but when he saw many other entering through the strait gate he rejoiced.

In this text Abraham asked his angelic guide, “Who is this most wondrous man, who is adorned in such glory?” The angel informs Abraham, This is the first-formed Adam who is in such glory, and he looks at the world, since everyone has come from him.”102

In a recent study of the Testament of Abraham Phillip Munoa demonstrates that the enthroned figures of Abel and Adam portrayed in this text are influenced by the descriptions in Daniel chapter 7 and that Adam in the Testament of Abraham should be understood to represent the ancient of days, agreeing with Joseph Smith’s teaching that Adam was the “Ancient of Days” (D&C 27:11; 116:1).

In this text we also see Adam not only glorified in his post-mortal state, but having a throne and sitting at the gate or entrance to Paradise.

According to Heber C. Kimball, the Prophet spoke of a vision in which he saw Adam acting as a gate keeper at one of the heavenly gates. “He saw Adam open the gate of the Celestial City and admit the people one by one. He then saw Father Adam conduct them to the throne one by one, when they were crowned Kings and Priests of God.”103

According to Kimball,

He (Joseph) saw until they had accomplished their work, and arrived at the gate of the celestial city; there Father Adam stood and opened the gate to them, and as they entered he embraced them one by one and kissed them. He then led them to the throne of God, and then the Savior embraced each one of them and kissed them, and crowned each one of them in the presence of God. He saw that they all had beautiful heads of hair and all looked alike. The impression of the vision left on Brother Joseph’s mind was of so acute a nature, that he never could refrain from weeping while rehearsing it.104

Concluding Personal Reflections

Critics of Latter-day Saint Scripture and teachings have generally paid very little attention to the Book of Moses. Those who have condescended to comment on it have generally dismissed it as a shallow plagiarism of New Testament doctrines and themes if they do not ignore it altogether.105

Such dismissals show an unawareness on the part of these commentators of the often striking convergences between the Latter-day Saint scripture and the ancient world.106

Critics, skeptics and the disaffected have in my view greatly underestimated the revelations of Joseph Smith. Unfortunately, so have many members of the Church of Jesus Christ.

I submit to you that the Latter-day revelations of ancient texts through the Prophet Joseph Smith are a treasure that we Latter-day Saints have yet to fully value and cherish.

From the perspective of a believer we may survey the past as a series of dispensations. Each one gone before like a beautiful chandelier was once filled with wonderful light but is now broken and scattered.

As we survey the past with its cycle of previous restorations and apostasies the careful observer may often detect broken pieces, imperfect, incomplete, but sometimes very beautiful in reflecting partial light and truth.

Some may view those pieces as lucky coincidence or ignore them altogether, and they are certainly free to do so.

Latter-day Saints may be justified in seeing such ancient convergences as reflecting, broken, but sometimes beautiful parts of a much larger and older story, now more fully illuminated by the Restoration.

 

Search topics

Adam in ancient texts; Adam and Eve traditions; Book of Moses; premortal Adam; pre-existence of Adam; Adam and the divine council; Job 15 and the first man; sons of God; Adam in the Garden of Eden; Fall of Adam and Eve; agency and opposition; angelic messengers to Adam; three heavenly messengers; testing true and false messengers; Adam and sacrifice; Adam and repentance; baptism of Adam; Adam and sacred ordinances; Mandaean Adam traditions; Manichaean Adam traditions; Armenian Adam and Eve literature; Life of Adam and Eve; Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan; Testament of Adam; Apocalypse of Adam; Adam as king and priest; Adam as Ancient of Days; Adam's heavenly ascent; exaltation and deification of Adam; restoration of Adam to heavenly glory

Joseph Smith and ancient texts; Joseph Smith Book of Moses; Book of Moses historicity; Pearl of Great Price criticism; Book of Moses criticism; Joseph Smith plagiarism claims; Joseph Smith translation claims; ancient parallels to Latter-day Saint scripture; Mormon Adam beliefs; Mormon temple parallels; Mormon Church temple ordinances; Latter-day Saint teachings about deification; Latter-day Saint teachings about Adam; evidence for Joseph Smith revelations

Frequently Asked

What do ancient texts say about Adam that parallels Latter-day Saint scripture?

Ancient texts from several religious traditions portray Adam as more than simply the first mortal man. They describe themes including Adam’s existence before mortality, heavenly knowledge, instruction by angels, opposition from deceptive messengers, sacrifice, repentance, baptism, sacred ordinances, and eventual restoration to heavenly glory. Matt Roper argues that these traditions contain notable parallels with teachings about Adam found in the Book of Moses and other Latter-day Saint scripture.

Why does Matt Roper compare these traditions with the Book of Moses?

Roper argues that ancient Adam traditions provide historical and religious context for teachings revealed through Joseph Smith. He sees the parallels not as identical traditions preserved intact, but as fragmented remnants that can illuminate themes found more fully in Restoration scripture.

Was Adam baptized according to ancient traditions?

The Bible does not describe Adam’s baptism, but Roper cites ancient traditions that do. He particularly discusses Mandaean texts in which a heavenly messenger teaches and baptizes Adam, comparing these accounts with Moses 6, where Adam is baptized by water and receives the Holy Ghost.

Do ancient texts describe angels teaching Adam and Eve?

Yes. Roper cites several ancient traditions in which heavenly messengers instruct Adam and Eve after the Fall. The teachings include practical instruction, repentance, baptism, sacred rituals, heavenly knowledge, and preparation for returning to God’s presence.

Do ancient traditions portray Adam as exalted after death?

Several texts discussed by Roper portray Adam as restored to heavenly glory. Some describe him enthroned, possessing divine authority, surpassing other righteous figures in glory, or standing near the entrance to Paradise. Roper compares these traditions with Latter-day Saint teachings concerning Adam’s exalted role and identity as the Ancient of Days.

“A Most Remarkable Book”: Supplementary Reading

October 7, 2011 by Stephen Smoot

A Most Remarkable Book – Trailer

This week FAIR has released a new DVD exploring the issues surrounding the Book of Abraham. “A Most Remarkable Book: Evidence for the Divine Authenticity of the Book of Abraham” puts forth answers to various criticisms directed against the Book of Abraham, as well as provides evidence favorable to the Book of Abraham’s ancient authenticity.
[Read more…] about “A Most Remarkable Book”: Supplementary Reading

Filed Under: Anti-Mormon critics, Apologetics, Book of Abraham Tagged With: bibliography, Book of Abraham, critics, DVD, Joseph Smith Papyri, Pearl of Great Price

Nephi and Goliath: A Reappraisal of the Use of the Old Testament in First Nephi

Start Here

Question
Did Nephi intentionally model parts of First Nephi on Old Testament narratives?

Short Answer
In this 2001 FAIR Conference presentation, Ben McGuire argues that Nephi deliberately drew upon Old Testament literary patterns when writing his record. He suggests that the account of obtaining the brass plates (1 Nephi 3–4) contains intentional parallels to both the story of David and Goliath and the Exodus narrative, inviting readers to recognize these scriptural connections.
Key Takeaways
  • McGuire argues that Nephi consciously used Old Testament literary patterns rather than accidentally echoing biblical stories.
  • The account of Nephi and Laban contains a sequence of parallels to David and Goliath, including:
    • A powerful adversary feared by others.
    • A faithful hero willing to act.
    • Divine deliverance into the hero’s hands.
    • The enemy being slain with his own sword.
  • Nephi’s narrative also reflects Exodus themes, portraying Lehi’s family as a covenant people journeying toward a promised land.
  • These parallels suggest that Nephi expected readers familiar with scripture to recognize and interpret these connections.
  • McGuire proposes that Nephi’s use of biblical patterns reinforces both his prophetic authority and his legitimacy as a ruler.
  • While literary parallels do not by themselves prove historicity, McGuire argues they demonstrate sophisticated scriptural awareness and intentional composition within the Book of Mormon text.

Summary

Summary

Ben McGuire explores how Nephi’s account of obtaining the brass plates may have been deliberately modeled after the biblical story of David and Goliath. By comparing narrative structure, language, and recurring themes, he identifies numerous parallels between the two stories, including the introduction of a powerful adversary, expressions of fear by others, divine deliverance, and the hero’s use of the enemy’s own sword.

The presentation also broadens the discussion to include Exodus imagery throughout First Nephi. McGuire argues that Nephi understood his family’s journey as part of a larger scriptural pattern and intentionally incorporated Old Testament motifs into his writings. These literary connections, he suggests, help explain Nephi’s emphasis on prophetic legitimacy, covenant identity, and kingship, while offering readers a deeper appreciation for the Book of Mormon’s engagement with biblical traditions.

TL;DR

TL;DR (Too Long; Didn’t Read)

Ben McGuire argues that Nephi intentionally patterned portions of First Nephi after Old Testament narratives, particularly David and Goliath and the Exodus. By comparing the account of obtaining the brass plates with biblical stories, McGuire identifies literary parallels that suggest Nephi expected readers to recognize and interpret these scriptural connections. The presentation explores how these patterns reinforce Nephi’s prophetic authority, kingship claims, and theological message.

Note About the Slides in this Presentation

Note on Visuals:

The original slides from Ben McGuire’s presentation were not available. The visuals included here were created with every effort to accurately reflect the speaker’s intent. However, any errors or oversimplifications are our own.

Download Ben McGuire's Paper

Download PDF

Introduction

Well, it’s a pleasure to be here. I’m actually a little bit nervous. There’s something different about talking in front of lots of people than there is about carefully crafting a response on the internet.

I actually started my foray into apologetics five or six years ago on the AOL discussion boards. 1

I don’t know how many of you participate in that. And I have done some stuff on the FAIR message boards. But not too much in the last year or so. I’ve been involved in a lot of other things which have taken a great deal of my time.

I kind of like to think of myself, not so much as going out finding lots of answers, but I do like to point out what I call “stupidity”. And sometimes people take offense. I’m not always wanting to jump into a discussion and pick a side. But when somebody comes up and says something that clearly is definitely wrong, I like to jump in.

Where This Topic Started

What I want to talk about today is some stuff that I’ve been working on for probably about two years now. And it came about in a funny kind of way. My dad and I were discussing some questions that he had about the death of Laban; in 1 Nephi, when Nephi kills him. Part of that was also because my mother is a big fan of Rene Girard. I don’t know how many of you have heard of him. He’s a philosopher who talks a lot about violence and social structures.

But my dad was asking me (about) when Nephi’s got Laban’s armor on. Nobody ever questions the fact that there probably should be a lot of blood because, you know, he’s just had his head chopped off. And then Nephi takes his armor off and puts it on.

So I got to thinking about it and I came up with just some unique ideas. And this has changed a lot. In my 50 minutes today I’m not going to have time to even get close to finishing all my notes in detail.

So for those of you who find this interesting, you know, I’ll put in a plug right now. You want to sign a sheet back there to receive your conference proceedings because the full paper will be in there.

Literary Forms in the Book of Mormon

Let me dig in. This is going to be something new for some of you. And if you do have questions, I don’t really have a problem with you getting up, even in the middle of my presentation, and asking them. A lot of times I’m going to make some leaps perhaps. So if you can’t follow it and you have some questions, just let me know.

This paper is about some of the literary forms of the Book of Mormon and about the Book of Mormon as literature. So I’m going to be talking about it in two perspectives. I don’t want you to take this to say that I don’t believe there isn’t a lot of historical detail and fact in the Book of Mormon. What I’m going to tell you is that these facts are being presented in a very specific way.

A number of years ago—well over the last, say, 20 years—we’ve got a number of new people writing about the literary aspects of the Book of Mormon. One of the big things that’s been a fun topic to read is this idea that we’re seeing all these very detailed parallels between the Exodus pattern in the Book of Mormon and the Exodus of ancient Israel out of Egypt.

As a base—and I’m not going to get too much into the works—I’m using as a foundation for this some of the writings of

  • S. Kent Brown,
  • George Tate,
  • Terry Szink, and
  • Noel Reynolds,

for those of you who read some of those. If you haven’t, look up some of their essays and stuff on the authorship of the Book of Mormon. They’re very fascinating.

The Exodus Pattern and Nephi

To begin with, Brown published an article entitled The Exodus Pattern of the Book of Mormon. In it he makes the following comment. He says:

“There is no fair statement indicating that the members of Lehi’s immediate family understood that their departure from Jerusalem was a reenactment of Israel’s flight for freedom. It is necessary, therefore, to sift through the evidence piece by piece.”

And a little bit later he continues and says:

“It was not Nephi or Jacob, members of Lehi’s immediate family, who made this connection explicitly, it was others who came 500 years later.”

I’m not sure whether he still stands by this viewpoint.

And I’m certain that he’s correct that the Exodus itself, that Lehi takes from Jerusalem, is not a conscious reenactment. However, I believe that his other assumption is incorrect.

My Goals for this Presentation

This first part of this paper is going to demonstrate that:

  1. Not only was Nephi aware of the parallels that existed between his exodus and that of Moses and the Israelites, but that
  2. He intentionally patterns his writings on the Old Testament text.

And this isn’t to say that he makes an explicit reference, because he doesn’t. But rather, that he expects us as his audience to draw these connections. Part of this is due to the fact of the revelation that he’s received about the nature of the Book of Mormon coming forth in the last days. And there can be no doubt that for us to see this connection was in his mind when he wrote it.

Tate similarly makes the determination that Nephi comes to realization on the Exodus pattern. He wrote this in his article, The Typology of the Exodus Pattern in the Book of Mormon:

“But at this point he cannot have known how apt the allusion really is. This is Nephi before he has the text in hand as a means of glossing his experience, before he realizes in what detail his own family will replicate the Exodus. As his awareness grows, he alludes with increasing frequency to the Exodus.”

And to that I respond that by focusing exclusively on these Exodus narratives in the Book of Mormon, Tate leaves behind a number of other indicators which demonstrate conclusively that there is not a growing awareness.

Extra-Exodus Parallels

In fact, Nephi begins his record by pulling heavily from the Old Testament as if he is assuming his work and the Old Testament will be read side by side. Because of this there are a number of earlier parallels in the Nephi material which Tate does not identify, particularly because they do not deal with the Exodus at all.

And once we see them for what they are in these passages, we see that Nephi was consistently relying on the brass plates.

The Brass Plates and Literary Dependence

I also want to make a quick mention of Szink’s work. He wrote To the Land of Promise, and it was really one of the first studies on the literary issues of the Book of Mormon that delved into language as an issue. Particularly, he talks about the use of the term murmuring and how the many times it is used in First and Second Nephi go back to the way that the Israelites murmured for Moses while traveling from Egypt to their promised land.

I’ve had to make a couple of the same assumptions that Szink makes when he does this. And clearly my paper here is not extensive enough—large enough in scope—to defend these assumptions. And I’ll mention this again in just a minute. But regardless, Szink adds to this growing evidence of text reliance.

One of the things, though, that he deals with is he speaks a lot of this verse in First Nephi 6:3–4. And he does it when he writes this. He says:

“The result does not represent a day-to-day or even a year-to-year account, but rather a highlight of main events with special emphasis on the things of God and a desire to persuade men to come to the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob and be saved.”

Kingship and the Message of the Book of Mormon

One of the things that I’m going to point out is that for Nephi, there is no distinction between this concept that Jesus is the Christ and this concept that Nephi is a king and than Lehi is a prophet. All these things are represented as the same truth.

And so following Noel Reynolds in his Political Nephi, Nehi’s text has a number of very political elements and secular elements that don’t reflect the ministry at all, but instead deal with these issues of kingship and the right rule. He ties these together in such a way that the gospel then becomes the same message.

In fact, Noel Reynolds wrote this. He said:

“The two messages of the book are tied in such a way that whoever accepts the teachings of Christ accepts that Nephi was a legitimate ruler, and vice versa. Nephi carefully constructed what he wrote to convince his own later generations the Lord had selected him over his older brothers to be Lehi’s successor. Thus one interesting way to read the account is as a political tract produced to show that his rule was authoritative. What we tend to read as a story of flight from Jerusalem is really a carefully designed account showing to the successors why the religious faith of Christ and their political tradition—the kingship of Nephi—are both truly legitimate.”

And I think that some of the ideas I’m going to share may validate Brother Reynolds’ approach.

An Assumption About the King James Bible

Now before I jump into the text here in the Book of Mormon, I wanted to explore that one assumption that I mentioned is beyond the scope of this paper to defend.

Although I think that as this growing body of literature develops over the literary nature of the Book of Mormon, it’s going to have to be dealt with, and it will be invaluable to us when it does.

And that is just this: we all recognize that the language of the King James Version of the Bible is used extensively throughout the Book of Mormon.

The assumption that I make is that when the Book of Mormon uses similar phrases to the King James language of the Bible, that these passages are based on a language which is similar or identical in their original texts.

Now I admit that this assumption is pivotal to my work, but more than that it’s also very difficult if not impossible to prove conclusively simply because we don’t have the original text of the Book of Mormon to deal with.

The Four Elements of Scripture

I’m going to put some of the scripture references here. If you can’t read them, I’m sorry. I’m going to give you the references so that way you can look them up. The first one’s in 1 Nephi 5:11 through 1 Nephi 6:6.

And actually, we’re just going to read 5:11 to 5:14.

This deals with Nephi’s concept of history in terms of scriptural writings, and he tells us this. And you’re going to see as we continue that he’s very consistent in this viewpoint.

They get the brass plates back and Lehi goes through and reads them. And Lehi comes back and he tells his family what he found in them, and he covers four distinct areas.

The first, he says—and we’re going to start reading here in verse 11:

“And he beheld that it contained the five books of Moses, which gave an account of the creation of the world, and also of Adam and Eve, who were our first parents; and also a record of the Jews from the beginning even down to the commencement of the reign of Zedekiah, king of Judah; and also the prophecies of the holy prophets from the beginning even down to the commencement of the reign of Zedekiah; and also many prophecies which have been spoken by the mouth of Jeremiah.

And it came to pass that my father Lehi also found upon the plates of brass a genealogy of his fathers; wherefore he knew that he was a descendant of Joseph; yea, that Joseph who was the son of Jacob, who was sold into Egypt and who was preserved by the hand of the Lord, that he might preserve his father Jacob and all his household from perishing with famine.”

The Four Elements Explained

So now we’re going to notice that there are really four main elements that he discusses here.

  1. The first one is a creation account.
  2. The second one is a record of the people, which is a history—and more particularly a history of kings and the reign of people.
  3. The third part is a record of the prophecies, or as Nephi calls them in his own work, ‘the ministries’.
  4. And then fourth, we have a genealogy.

Nephi’s Own Record

Now it’s validated, this viewpoint, where Nephi discusses his own writings, which he clearly understands are going to be read as scripture.

All four of these parts are not included in the small plates of Nephi. And Nephi states specifically that he’s going to choose to include some of these components and not others.

Now let’s go ahead and move on. This is 1 Nephi 6:1.

And Nephi says this:

“And now I, Nephi, do not give the genealogy of my fathers in this part of my record; neither at any time shall I give it after upon these plates which I am writing, for it is given in the record which has been kept by my father; wherefore, I do not write it in this work.”

The Small Plates and the Large Plates

The Purpose of the Small Plates

The next one here is in 1 Nephi 9:2–4 and 10:1, and on this I’ll skip to the relevant verses there.

2 And now, as I have spoken concerning these plates, behold they are not the plates upon which I make a full account of the history of my people; for the plates upon which I make a full account of my people I have given the name of Nephi; wherefore, they are called the plates of Nephi, after mine own name; and these plates also are called the plates of Nephi.

3 Nevertheless, I have received a commandment of the Lord that I should make these plates, for the special purpose that there should be an account engraven of the ministry of my people.

4 Upon the other plates should be engraven an account of the reign of the kings, and the wars and contentions of my people; wherefore these plates are for the more part of the ministry; and the other plates are for the more part of the reign of the kings and the wars and contentions of my people.

1 And now I, Nephi, proceed to give an account upon these plates of my proceedings, and my reign and ministry; wherefore, to proceed with mine account, I must speak somewhat of the things of my father, and also of my brethren.

And then again in 1 Nephi 19:1–5:

1 And it came to pass that the Lord commanded me, wherefore I did make plates of ore that I might engraven upon them the record of my people. And upon the plates which I made I did engraven the record of my father, and also our journeyings in the wilderness, and the prophecies of my father; and also many of mine own prophecies have I engraven upon them.

2 And I knew not at the time when I made them that I should be commanded of the Lord to make these plates; wherefore, the record of my father, and the genealogy of his fathers, and the more part of all our proceedings in the wilderness are engraven upon those first plates of which I have spoken; wherefore, the things which transpired before I made these plates are, of a truth, more particularly made mention upon the first plates.

3 And after I had made these plates by way of commandment, I, Nephi, received a commandment that the ministry and the prophecies, the more plain and precious parts of them, should be written upon these plates; and that the things which were written should be kept for the instruction of my people, who should possess the land, and also for other wise purposes, which purposes are known unto the Lord.

The Purpose of the Large Plates

And then:

4 Wherefore, I, Nephi, did make a record upon the other plates, which gives an account, or which gives a greater account of the wars and contentions and destructions of my people.

Then finally in 2 Nephi 5:33 he goes over that again:

33 And if my people desire to know the more particular part of the history of my people they must search mine other plates.

Now if you take a look at this, with the exception of the first item in my list of four things—which is the creation account—the other three items are discussed a number of times relative to whether to include or exclude them in this record.

The Four Categories Revisited

The creation is a little different. It is referred to a number of times, and we are told that this narrative was included in the brass plates, that it was also recorded in the writings of the Jaredites and the twenty-four gold plates found by the people of King Limhi.

Nephi does not include it specifically, nor does any other writer in the Book of Mormon, but it is mentioned numerous times.

The second item, the history, Nephi tells us is recorded for the most part on his larger plates, but some parts are included in the small plates—specifically items that deal with the reign of Nephi, when he says that he wants to include things about his reign.

And I’m going to be getting into this quite a bit more in a few minutes because it has special relevance to the major passage that I’m presenting.

The third item listed is the ministry and revelations of the prophets, and this takes special consideration as the primary purpose of the small plates. This was by direct commandment and revelation.

And then finally, the fourth item: genealogy. He tells us consistently that he’s not going to include it because it’s already contained in the other scriptural records that are available to him.

Nephi’s Writings Alongside the Old Testament

I believe that clearly this is, in the case of the large plates, the objective: to make them “like unto the engravings which are on the plates of brass”. He’s kind of following the same pattern.

And here what I think you find is that on the small plates particularly, the historical pieces of information that he provides us to some extent deal with his reign and his ministry. And this is very significant.

I think it’s also true that Nephi, after his vision that he has very early in his life, sees his writings as being read alongside the writings which make up the Old Testament.

Nephi receives specific revelations to that effect, in 1 Nephi 13:41, where Nephi is told:

41 And they must come according to the words which shall be established by the mouth of the Lamb; and the words of the Lamb shall be made known in the records of thy seed, as well as in the records of the twelve apostles of the Lamb; wherefore they both shall be established in one; for there is one God and one Shepherd over all the earth.

And then a little later he says of John the Revelator:

21 Behold, he shall see and write the remainder of these things; yea, and also many things which have been.

Then, he also refers to the Old Testament that we have as being similar to the arrangement of the brass plates. As you recall, he also says “except that there are not so many”.

I think this idea—that the Book of Mormon writings that Nephi is preparing would stand alongside scripture—certainly affected their contents.

Nephi and the Old Testament

Now the historical narratives within the books of First and Second Nephi, I believe, contain elements which deal with these two themes that he discusses: his reign and his ministry, as I pointed out.

My objective is to show that the narratives presented by Nephi are often rooted in the stories of the Old Testament as found in the brass plates.

  1. We can identify specific parallels of the biblical texts.
  2. We have to use our traditional Bible to an extent because we don’t have a copy of the brass plates.
  3. We can then see that Nephi borrowed extensively, which would only be natural – but only from texts within his possession.

Introducing “Nephi and Goliath”

By now you’re probably wondering why I titled this paper Nephi and Goliath.

And my objective here is to show that Nephi, in writing this literary unit—that is, the story of his encounter with Laban and killing Laban—was actually patterned in very detailed fashion on the story of David killing Goliath in the Old Testament.

I’m going to start by using the story in the Book of Mormon as a primary source material, along with the King James Version. And I want to show that:

  • the form of the story,
  • the language,
  • the events that occur, and
  • the fact that these parallels occur in chronological order—

I’m going to build a case that there’s a great deal of literary reliance between the two texts.

Introducing the Parallel: Nephi and Goliath

And then when I get done, I want to point out some interesting details in relation to the text that Nephi used. Assuming that he’s using the brass plates, how it’s different from the traditional text that we have, and how this reflects back on the authenticity of the Book of Mormon.

Now, my paper here—I’ve actually got the entire stories printed out. So you’ll have to come and look at it. We’re not going to have time to read through it all, but I’m going to provide a summary of two stories.

Nephi Arranging the Narrative How He Wants Us to See It

Nephi and his brothers, of course, are sent back to Jerusalem to get these brass plates. The first couple of attempts fail. That’s very interesting. You know, sometimes we look at this and we get this perception the way that Nephi wants us to see it.

For all we know, the first time back they might have gone and taken Laban out to the bar and sat down, given him a few earrings and then asked, you know, for brass plates: “Hey, can you help us out here?”

So really we are going to get very much a first-person perspective—or a third-person perspective—depending on which part of the story we’re dealing with.

But after the first couple of attempts fail, including trying to trade all their wealth for the brass plates, we get to the point where Laman and Lemuel are basically beating their brothers into submission.

And then the angel shows up and tells them that God’s going to take care of it all. Then after the angel disappears, Laman and Lemuel begin their normal murmuring cycle. And Nephi says, “Well, let’s go do it.”

So Nephi heads back on his own, and he finds, of course, Laban laying there on the ground, passed out. (Nephi) chops off his head, takes his armor, and goes and retrieves the brass plates using Laban’s identity.

The Story of David and Goliath

We’re all probably also familiar with the story of David and Goliath, which is a pretty lengthy thing. We have this Goliath of Gath that gets up every morning and they’re in the middle of this war. He comes out to the field of battle and says, “If you send somebody out to fight me one-on-one, let’s decide this battle and we’ll be all set. Whoever wins, they’ll win the war.”

Of course everybody’s terrified of Goliath, who is a giant of a man, clearly very well trained in military arts.

“All of Israel” they say, “is afraid.” David shows up and says, “I’ll go and face down the Philistine.” He ends up going out there and killing him.

Now what we’re going to do is I’m going to be putting up here on the overhead projection a series of scriptural passages I’m going to talk about, and these are going to be my sequence of parallels. So we’ll quickly flip to the next one.

Parallel #1: The Mighty Man

The first parallel I want to talk about is the very beginning. I want to say that Nephi’s use of this Old Testament storyline begins in 1 Samuel 17.

In verses 4–11 (1 Samuel 17) talks really about the military might of Goliath. And I’m going to read it. I’m going to be skipping verses 8, 9 and 10.

“And there went out a champion out of the camp of the Philistines, named Goliath of Gath, whose height was six cubits and a span. And he had a helmet of brass upon his head, and he was armed with a coat of mail; and the weight of the coat was five thousand shekels of brass. And he had greaves of brass upon his legs, and a target of brass between his shoulders.

And the staff of his spear was like a weaver’s beam; and his spear’s head weighed six hundred shekels of iron: and one bearing a shield went before him.”

“When Saul and all Israel heard the words of the Philistine, they were dismayed, and greatly afraid.”

Then I’m putting that against 1 Nephi 3:31, the last verse of chapter 3:

“And after the angel had departed, Laman began to murmur, saying: How is it possible that the Lord will deliver Laban into our hands? Behold, he is a mighty man, and he can command fifty; yea, even he can slay fifty; then why not us?”

For lack of a better term, I’m going to use Nephi’s term here throughout the rest of this storyline. I call this the introduction of the mighty man.

In the Old Testament story, it’s Goliath. In 1 Nephi, it’s Laban.

Of course, we have the second set of cast members. In the Old Testament, we have Saul and all Israel. In the Book of Mormon, we have Laman and Lemuel.

And I think there’s a distinct parallel Nephi will continue to reinforce later on. We have this concept of faithless Israel, and we see it on both sides.

We have, on one hand, the Israelites who are ready to run at the drop of a hat. And here’s Laman and Lemuel, who don’t really want to be there in the first place, who are convinced that they’re all going to end up dead if they continue to pursue this course of action.

It’s also worthy of note that both of these mighty men are described in terms of military might and prowess:

  • Laban in terms of how many men he commands in the field;
  • Goliath in terms of his equipment. And it’s been pointed out often that this detailed description of his armor and weaponry really just serves to show that he was an experienced warrior.

Parallel #2: The Hero Appears

Let’s go ahead and continue now and we’re going to move to 1 Samuel 17:32 and 1 Nephi 4:1.

And David said to Saul:

“Let no man’s heart fail because of him; thy servant will go and fight with this Philistine.”

And then Nephi says:

“And it came to pass that I spake unto my brethren, saying: Let us go up again unto Jerusalem, and let us be faithful in keeping the commandments of the Lord; for behold he is mightier than all the earth, then why not mightier than Laban and his fifty, yea, or even than his tens of thousands?”

Now, this is the introduction of the hero.

David, of course, is the hero in the Old Testament text, while Nephi fills that role in his own account. And in his first appearance, the hero goes to faithless Israel and encourages them in their task, saying that there’s nothing to fear. The hero is willing to challenge the mighty man.

Parallel #3: Miracles as the Basis of Faith

Now let’s go ahead. Both heroes then cite, as the basis for their faith in their course of action, two miracles.

David cites two instances from his own life. Nephi cites one from the history of Israel and one from his own life.

Both of these miracles are significant from the hero’s point of view.

In both cases, the hero concludes by remarking that just as God performed these two miracles, God will then deliver them from the hands of the mighty man.

Miracles Revealed in the Narrative

So we read now from the Old Testament.

34 And David said unto Saul, Thy servant kept his father’s sheep, and there came a lion, and a bear, and took a lamb out of the flock:

35 And I went out after him, and smote him, and delivered it out of his mouth: and when he arose against me, I caught him by his beard, and smote him, and slew him.

36 Thy servant slew both the lion and the bear: and this uncircumcised Philistine shall be as one of them, seeing he hath defied the armies of the living God.

37 David said moreover, The Lord that delivered me out of the paw of the lion, and out of the paw of the bear, he will deliver me out of the hand of this Philistine. And Saul said unto David, Go, and the Lord be with thee.

And this is what Nephi says to his brothers. He says:

2 Therefore let us go up; let us be strong like unto Moses; for he truly spake unto the waters of the Red Sea and they divided hither and thither, and our fathers came through, out of captivity, on dry ground, and the armies of Pharaoh did follow and were drowned in the waters of the Red Sea.

3 Now behold ye know that this is true; and ye also know that an angel hath spoken unto you; wherefore can ye doubt? Let us go up; the Lord is able to deliver us, even as our fathers, and to destroy Laban, even as the Egyptians.

Now, David’s two miracles were being saved from two animals bent on killing him. Likewise he claims God would treat Goliath as merely one of these animals.

The two miracles for Nephi are:

  1. first, the destruction of the Egyptians when Moses parts the Red Sea; and
  2. second, the visitation of an angel. An angel, among other things, mentions that they will overcome Laban.

We’ll come back to the angel in a little bit, as he plays a larger role in explaining why Nephi includes this particular episode.

Exodus Imagery

The part you see is also significant as it serves to show God destroying the enemies of Israel while they’re leaving for their promised land. It’s coming back to the same Exodus topic that Nephi continues to use over and over again, particularly the further we go into the text.

And the other thing that we see is that the brothers have just mentioned Laban and his tens of thousands.

This is being subtly compared to by Nephi as the armies of the Egyptians. So now Laban becomes representative not necessarily only of the Philistines, but also this concept of the Egyptians and their armies chasing after Israel in the wilderness.

The idea that Laban is an obstacle that stands between Israel and their promised land—between Nephi and Lehi and their promised land—is quite clear. And just as in the Exodus, Nephi is claiming that God will fight the battles.

Parallel #4: God Delivers the Mighty Man

Now next we have remarks where the hero comes according to the will of God and that God delivers into the hero’s hands the mighty man.

So let’s move ahead. (I think this is the previous one. So let’s jump one more.)

Now I’m going to read through the First Samuel account, then we’ll jump into the First Nephi one. This is 1 Samuel 17:45–47.

45 Then said David to the Philistine, Thou comest to me with a sword, and with a spear, and with a shield: but I come to thee in the name of the Lord of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, whom thou hast defied.

46 This day will the Lord deliver thee into mine hand; and I will smite thee, and take thine head from thee; and I will give the carcases of the host of the Philistines this day unto the fowls of the air, and to the wild beasts of the earth; that all the earth may know that there is a God in Israel.

47 And all this assembly shall know that the Lord saveth not with sword and spear: for the battle is the Lord’s, and he will give you into our hands.

And then in 1 Nephi—this is from chapter 4, verses 6–12 and 17:

6 And I was led by the Spirit, not knowing beforehand the things which I should do.

7 Nevertheless I went forth, and as I came near unto the house of Laban I beheld a man, and he had fallen to the earth before me, for he was drunken with wine.

8 And when I came to him I found that it was Laban.

9 And I beheld his sword, and I drew it forth from the sheath thereof; and the hilt thereof was of pure gold, and the workmanship thereof was exceedingly fine, and I saw that the blade thereof was of the most precious steel.

10 And it came to pass that I was constrained by the Spirit that I should kill Laban; but I said in my heart: Never at any time have I shed the blood of man. And I shrunk and would that I might not slay him.

11 And the Spirit said unto me again: Behold the Lord hath delivered him into thy hands. Yea, and I also knew that he had sought to take away mine own life; yea, and he would not hearken unto the commandments of the Lord; and he also had taken away our property.

12 And it came to pass that the Spirit said unto me again: Slay him, for the Lord hath delivered him into thy hands;

17 And again, I knew that the Lord had delivered Laban into my hands for this cause—that I might obtain the records according to his commandments.

Now, I find this especially significant.

Delivering the ‘Mighty’ Into the Hands of the Hero

This type of language is not uncommon in the Old Testament. It’s used rather regularly, actually. However, this is the only place in the Book of Mormon where this concept occurs.

Whenever we use this idea of deliverance in the Book of Mormon, it’s always that you’re being delivered from evil, or delivered from the grave, or from the hands of your enemy.

Here, in both stories, we have God delivering the mighty man into the hands of the hero.

It is possible, of course, that the phrasing in First Nephi is based somewhat in Exodus 21:13, especially given the context.

Exodus 21:13 deals with accidental death—the laws regarding revenge in dealing with accidental death, as you recall. It actually says:

“And if a man lie not in wait, but God deliver him into his hands; then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee.”

There is some appropriateness to this context here.

However, I believe that just as Szink pointed out phraseology and other parts of the Book of Mormon show this literary dependence on the Old Testament, that here it has a stronger argument and textual basis, especially given this list of parallel similarities.

Parallel #5: The Mighty Man Defies God

Lastly, in that last section—which we won’t have up, and I probably can’t go back to, but that’s okay—

You’ll notice that in both cases we have this concept that the mighty man has defied the will of God.

We have, in the one case, Goliath, who is standing in defiance of the armies of the God of Israel. And in First Nephi’s account, there in verse 11, it says that Laban “would not hearken unto the commandments of the Lord.”

So we also have this recognition that the mighty man is not a man of righteousness. There’s some deserving – this is divine retribution for his activities in his life.

Okay, we’re going to continue on to the last step here.

Parallel #6: The Hero Kills the Mighty Man with His Own Sword

First Samuel 17:51:

“Therefore David ran, and stood upon the Philistine, and took his sword, and drew it out of the sheath thereof, and slew him, and cut off his head therewith.”

And in 1 Nephi 4:18:

“Therefore I did obey the voice of the Spirit, and took Laban by the hair of the head, and I smote off his head with his own sword.”

These parallels in those two verses have been widely recognized. And a really neat additional comment is that the hero kills the mighty man with his own sword. He decapitates him in both cases.

Why Does Nephi Include This Story?

Now, the next direction I want to take this is this question of why Nephi includes this in the Book of Mormon. It seems kind of an odd scene.

This deals largely with Nephi’s authority as ruler and king of the Nephite peoples. And as was pointed out earlier—and any other groups that they’re with—clearly there’s something to be said for putting yourself in the role of King David as the preeminent king of all Israel, going through the same steps.

First, he’s chosen by a heavenly messenger in much the same way. You know, who cares about your brothers? You’re the chosen guy.

And then he’s following through in some of these similar actions.

The Question of Kingship

And I especially wanted to point out that, as recorded in 2 Nephi 5 (2 Nephi 5:1-5, 34), this whole issue of who has the right to rule is critical to Nephi at this point in time.

In verse 34 there he says:

“And it sufficeth me to say that forty years had passed away, and we had already had wars and contentions with our brethren.”

Over this right of rulership.

The third point I want to make here is that, following the second aspect of this inclusion, we realize that the story, rather than dealing with the ministry, deals with this reign and kingship.

I wanted to add this point: the stories of David and Solomon and other early Israelite leaders were well known to the Lehite peoples as part of the brass plates.

And I think this is significant. They often use examples. I mean, there’s that famous thing in Jacob where they’re dealing with the whole polygamy issue, where they justify it based on the activities of Solomon and David.

They are aware of the lives of these men, and so we can assume they have some familiarity.

Early and Late Sources in David and Goliath

Now let’s jump to something really fascinating here.

If we take a look at some of the higher criticism of the story of David and Goliath in the Old Testament, I believe it’s fair to say there is a scholarly consensus that there are, in fact, two different source materials: an early source and a later source.

The composite early source consists of:

  • 1 Samuel 16:14–23
  • 1 Samuel 17:1–11
  • 1 Samuel 17:32–40
  • 1 Samuel 17:42–48a
  • 1 Samuel 17:49
  • 1 Samuel 17:51–54

With the later source containing all the rest of the material.

This identification actually was not very difficult for scholars because the Septuagint actually omits most of that material, representing the former tradition.

If we go back to my list of sources that I use for the parallels, what you’re going to notice is that Nephi quotes chapter 17:4–11, which is the first part there.

He then jumps immediately to a parallel in 17:32, and then 17:34–37, and so on and so forth. And what you’ll notice is that every one of the references that he parallels is from that early source material. In fact, he doesn’t seem to recognize that any of the later source material exists, which is highly fascinating.

Structural Similarities Between the Texts

I put this here because I wanted to put something into perspective. And that is this. On the left side is the David and Goliath story of the Old Testament once the later source material is removed.

And you’ll notice that the stuff in the Book of Mormon is very similar in structure, both in length and item following item. He actually seems to be following this story in a very detailed fashion, as if he’s got one open in front of him while he’s writing the other.

And following that, going back to what I told you about Brother Brown, when he said that he sees this increasing frequency of parallels in the Exodus material, I believe it’s because Nephi is borrowing from other sources.

It gets into the Exodus as they really get into their journey. Before that, he doesn’t. I have a lot more material here that deals with some of the earlier stuff, and so I’m going to cover just one or two points. And then for the rest of it you’ll have to go out and buy the proceedings of this conference.

The Caiaphas Parallel

Going back to this, it does a couple of interesting things though.

One of the things I want to point out is this: there’s a long-standing anachronism claim in the Book of Mormon where we have this quote, apparently by Nephi when he’s getting ready to kill Laban:

“It is better that one man should perish than that a nation should dwindle and perish in unbelief.”

We’re all familiar with that.

And then that same passage is more or less quoted verbatim by Caiaphas regarding Jesus Christ in the New Testament.

If Nephi is borrowing here from an Old Testament tradition of David and Goliath, it stands to reason that there is the possibility that, in fact, Caiaphas is also borrowing from a tradition of David and Goliath in an environment in which a quote like this stands to make absolute sense.

How many people expected David to go out there and kill Goliath?

There was only one, as I recall, and that was David himself.

And so, in a sense, Israel is sending out one man to perish that the nation would not.

It’s an interesting tie-in.

Additional Implications of Textual Reliance

Second—and this is something else that’s interesting here, and I’m just going to make an aside. Here we have another evidence that the brass plates were slightly different.

Moses speaks, of course, to the Red Sea, he parts it. In the Old Testament, he doesn’t speak at all; he just waves his arms and the water goes through.

The point is that if we can assume textual reliance here, we can probably assume it elsewhere.

Lehi and the Call of Moses

So, we go back to the beginning of Lehi’s calling. I call this literary section “the call of Moses and the trip to Sinai” at the very beginning of First Nephi chapters 1 and 2.

It’s kind of funny. There’s this footnote in First Nephi dealing with a pillar of fire that comes before Lehi on a rock. Do you remember that? This pillar shows up on a rock. We have this little footnote at the bottom. It was added some years ago in our scriptures. It points us back to the pillar of fire that led the Israelites out of Egypt.

Well, the truth is that, according to my understanding, Lehi is in fact going through the same process that Moses went through when he became a prophet.

Remember, this goes back to recognizing Nephi and Lehi as legitimate prophets. He’s following the steps of Moses. And so this pillar of fire is actually the burning bush.

Numbers 12 and Prophetic Legitimacy

Now what’s interesting about this is that Nephi seems to be basing this part of the text on a passage in Numbers 12:6.

At one moment we have Moses, whose wife has passed, and he goes out and marries a new wife. It’s this Ethiopian woman, and his family—his brother and sister—immediately get all upset and offended at what he’s done.

And they come out and they say, “Well, clearly he’s not a prophet anymore. We’re all prophets, too. We can lead the people.”

And the Lord calls all three of them out from the tribes of Israel and chooses out Miriam and Aaron and says to them this. This is Numbers 12:6:

“Hear now my words: If there be a prophet among you, I the Lord will make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a dream.”

The Relevance of Lehi’s Vision

Of course, in First Nephi we have this passage, right?

Lehi goes home after seeing a pillar of fire on a rock. It says:

“And it came to pass that as he prayed unto the Lord, there came a pillar of fire and dwelt upon a rock before him; and he saw and heard much; and because of the things which he saw and heard he did quake and tremble exceedingly.”

He goes home and throws himself on his bed. And it says:

“And thus being overcome with the Spirit, he was carried away in a vision, even that he saw the heavens open, and he thought he saw God sitting upon his throne, surrounded with numberless concourses of angels in the attitude of singing and praising their God.”

Then I’m going to jump forward to 1 Nephi 2:1:

“For behold, it came to pass that the Lord spake unto my father, yea, even in a dream, and said unto him: Blessed art thou, Lehi, because of the things which thou hast done; and because thou hast been faithful and declared unto this people the things which I commanded thee, behold, they seek to take away thy life.”

Nephi here is following some very distinct Old Testament patterns to prove the legitimacy of his father’s prophetic calling.

The Three-Day Journey into the Wilderness

The last thing I want to mention just briefly is this—and this is kind of funny because this has come up a couple of times in this conference—and that is this three-day trip that they take into the wilderness.

It’s interesting. Eugene England—the quote that I had here—says this:

The route and times were quite specific, even somewhat mysteriously so: (and he quotes:) “He came down by the borders which are nearer the Red Sea and he traveled in the wilderness in the borders which are nearer the Red Sea; and he did travel in the wilderness with his family, which consisted of my mother, Sariah, and my elder brothers.” and then “when he had traveled three days in the wilderness, he pitched his tent in a valley by the side of a river of water …”.

This literal interpretation of three days has long been accepted and understood in LDS circles as being a helpful tidbit in determining the geography of Lehi’s trek to the coast of the sea, where they then sail to the New World.

Instead of viewing this as a literal approach, what I like to look at is this three-day trip in Exodus 3:18 where, after Moses has been called as a prophet, his first command is to go back to Egypt, to the Israelites, and then to tell Pharaoh:

“The Lord God of the Hebrews hath met with us: and now let us go, we beseech thee, three days’ journey into the wilderness, that we may sacrifice to the Lord our God.”

Now, this is mentioned over and over again in the next several chapters in the Old Testament.

Egypt to Marah

This three-day journey actually occurred. It was a trip between Egypt and Marah, which is interesting—the fact that they have this body of water there, by which the place is named because the water was bitter. So they called the place bitterness.

And there were a number of other issues there.

Among them was the fact that when Pharaoh says, “Why do you have to go so far?” Moses responds, “Well, if we stay here and offer burnt offerings—which are an abomination to you Egyptians—you’ll kill us all because we’re inside your cultic holiness area.”

The same could be true of Lehi and Nephi.

For them to go out and offer burnt offerings and renew this new covenant they’re making with the Lord in downtown Jerusalem would certainly cause some significant difficulties for them.

Other Types Nephi Draws On

I’m going to close since I’ve pretty much expended my time.

The truth is I haven’t had enough time to take these ideas to a logical conclusion. And I think we can find dozens of additional details and parallels. It could be that these things all fall into that nebulous category of “typing” the Book of Mormon.

I think, however, that when Nephi tells us that he likens all scriptures unto himself, he actually is doing that. Not only with the scriptures he’s reading, but the scriptures he’s writing.

And we can find these parallels. We have several very distinct Noah parallels as he builds his boat.

There’s even more with the story of Joseph going into Egypt. We have the binding in the wilderness, the slaying of beasts. We have this whole concept of Nephi as an interpreter of dreams, which is very interesting.

He starts with his father’s dream. It’s just bits and pieces. “Whoops, we’re all done with this. Now, let’s talk about this.” And the first thing that happens: his brothers come up and say to him, “What’s the meaning of this?” And he explains it to them.

Concluding Reflections

I think perhaps that it may be difficult to reconstruct various textual reliance between the brass plates and the Book of Mormon. Because we don’t really have the brass plates to compare.

But the Book of Mormon can give us additional insight into the scriptures they carried with them. We can see that not only do they have more in some areas and less in others. But it can also give us a better understanding of the Bible. And where it’s at in terms of how it’s been preserved in that picture.

I’d like to close just by stating that this apologetics work that I’ve been involved in through FAIR has been a great source of joy and personal satisfaction. In dealing with the gospel in new ways and learning new ideas and ways of looking at things.

And I think that this is the type of stuff that we as Saints need to be doing. Building our own personal testimonies of the gospel and answering these questions for ourselves.

And I’ll close in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

Question and Answer Session

We do have time for maybe one or two questions. If you want to ask me, then we’ll take our break.

Question: What About Blood on Laban’s Armor?

Question

Earlier you alluded to the fact that, yeah, there’d be blood all over Laban’s armor and so forth. But you never did explain that.

Answer

My personal ideas about that are quite a bit off the beaten track.

Based on the fact that he’s writing the story to prove a point. That means that he probably got some of the details out of chronological order as they actually occurred historically.

And that maybe it’s much more likely that

  1. Nephi finds Laban laying there, passed out drunk in the middle of the road,
  2. takes off his armor,
  3. gets ready to go back to the brass plates
  4. and that’s when the Spirit says, “No, wait a minute—you better go back and finish the job here.”

So I believe that that’s not really an issue. It only becomes an issue because these parts of the stories are right next to each other when in fact it’s not necessarily a chronological series.

That’s my own personal feeling. I’ll stop there.

Question: If Nephi Is Alluding to David and Goliath, Why Does He Do It This Way?

Question

If Nephi is alluding to the story of David and Goliath, why [indistinguishable]?

Answer

Well, it’s a good question.

I think that for starters, Nephi says that they’ve got the brass plates. The only time he ever really directly uses them is when he quotes all this Isaiah material.

And that’s another oddity. You would think that he and his descendants would have the brass plates right there. He wouldn’t need to put it all down.

I think there’s two reasons why he doesn’t directly allude to it.

Nephi’s Audience is Not 100% Israelites

One of them goes back to one of the other papers that was presented at this conference. Nephi’s audience is not 100% Israelites at the time that he’s writing.

  • There’s been some cultural merging.
  • There’s a larger group of people that they’re dealing with.
  • There’s no way that just Nephi and his family could split into two groups. Large enough to have had a number of wars and contentions over this rulership issue.

So I think rather than:

  • going back and
  • having to retell the story to everybody and
  • then saying, “And just like David and Goliath.”

He’s putting his story out in a way that shows that there’s some stuff going on here.

Some of the group is going to immediately recognize these parallels, and some isn’t. It just depends on who you’re talking to.

The Brass Plates as a Type for the Spoils of Egypt

Another interesting thing that I didn’t bring up, that I think might also go along with this. Is this whole concept of the brass plates being worth more than all of their wealth.

Going back to the Exodus. It’s quite possible that Nephi saw his taking the brass plates as the spoiling of Egypt.

When they leave Egypt they take all this wealth with them. Though he’s leaving Jerusalem, he’s taking something that’s worth far more than anything he had. But he doesn’t see it as stealing. He’s taking the stuff that the Lord wants him to take.

Thank you.

FAQ / Common Questions

What is the main argument of this presentation?

Ben McGuire argues that Nephi intentionally incorporated Old Testament literary patterns into his record, especially parallels to David and Goliath and the Exodus.

Why does McGuire compare Nephi and Laban to David and Goliath?

He identifies a sequence of narrative similarities, including a powerful enemy, a faithful hero, divine deliverance, and the use of the enemy’s own sword.

Does the presentation claim Nephi copied the Bible?

No. McGuire argues that Nephi consciously drew upon scriptural traditions preserved on the brass plates and expected readers to recognize those connections.

How does the Exodus relate to First Nephi?

McGuire suggests that Lehi’s departure from Jerusalem and journey into the wilderness mirrors Israel’s Exodus from Egypt and that Nephi intentionally emphasizes these parallels.

Why is the brass plates narrative important?

According to McGuire, it serves multiple purposes: preserving sacred records, establishing Nephi’s legitimacy as a leader, and connecting his story to familiar scriptural patterns.

Search topics

Nephi and Goliath; Ben McGuire FAIR Conference 2001; First Nephi literary analysis; David and Goliath parallels; Nephi and Laban comparison; brass plates narrative; Old Testament in the Book of Mormon; Exodus typology in First Nephi; Lehi exodus from Jerusalem; literary patterns in scripture; Book of Mormon narrative structure; Nephi as king and prophet; brass plates traditions; biblical typology; scriptural allusions in the Book of Mormon; Nephi's authorship; prophetic legitimacy in First Nephi; kingship in the Book of Mormon; Davidic themes in Nephite writings; Lehi prophetic call; Book of Mormon literary studies; covenant themes in First Nephi; Moses and Nephi parallels; scriptural interpretation; Book of Mormon and Old Testament connections

CES Letter; Book of Mormon criticism; Book of Mormon historicity; Mormon apologetics; LDS apologetics; Mormon scripture origins; Book of Mormon evidence; Mormon truth claims; Mormon Church criticism; Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon; Book of Mormon authorship; Book of Mormon literary complexity; criticism of Nephi and Laban; Mormon historical claims; LDS faith questions; evidence for the Book of Mormon; Mormon intellectual tradition; Book of Mormon scholarship; anti-Mormon claims; Restoration truth claims

Best of FAIR 6: Adam in Ancient Texts and the Restoration

June 29, 2011 by SteveDensleyJr

https://media.blubrry.com/mormonfaircast/www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Adam-in-Ancient-Texts-and-the-Restor.mp3

Podcast: Download (32.0MB)

Subscribe: RSS

In the address from the 2006 FAIR Conference, Matthew Roper states: “Critics of Latter-day Saint Scripture and teachings have generally paid very little attention to the Book of Moses. Those who have condescended to comment on it have generally dismissed it as a shallow plagiarism of New Testament doctrines and themes if they do not ignore it altogether. Such dismissals show an unawareness on the part of these commentators of the often striking convergences between the Latter-day Saint scripture and the ancient world. Critics, skeptics and the disaffected have in my view greatly underestimated the revelations of Joseph Smith. Unfortunately, so have many members of the Church of Jesus Christ.”

The full text of this address can be found at here.

Matthew Roper (MS from Brigham Young University), is a resident scholar at the Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship at Brigham Young University.

Filed Under: Book of Moses, Podcast, Temples

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Faithful Study Resources for Come, Follow Me

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address:

Subscribe to Podcast

Podcast icon
Subscribe to podcast in iTunes
Subscribe to podcast elsewhere
Listen with FAIR app
Android app on Google Play Download on the App Store

Pages

  • Blog Guidelines

FAIR Latest

  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR – Isaiah 1–12 – Part 1 – Autumn Dickson
  • Because of Jesus Christ
  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR – Proverbs 1–4; 15–16; 22; 31; Ecclesiastes 1–3; 11–12 – Part 2 – Autumn Dickson
  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR – Proverbs 1–4; 15–16; 22; 31; Ecclesiastes 1–3; 11–12 – Jennifer Roach Lees
  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR – Proverbs 1–4; 15–16; 22; 31; Ecclesiastes 1–3; 11–12 – Part 1 – Autumn Dickson

Blog Categories

Recent Comments

  • Willie Louise Truitt on The Joy of a Covenant Relationship with God
  • Katrina on In memory of Chandler “Chuck” Hendry
  • Nancy Farmer on Come, Follow Me with FAIR – Psalms 49–51; 61–66; 69–72; 77–78; 85–86 – Part 1 – Autumn Dickson
  • Nicko De Leon on In memory of Chandler “Chuck” Hendry
  • Becky Matson on In memory of Chandler “Chuck” Hendry

Archives

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • iTunes
  • YouTube
Android app on Google Play Download on the App Store

Footer

FairMormon Logo

FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Donate to FAIR

We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.

Donate Now

Site Footer

The use of the temple in past and current logos and the name "Mormon" are licensed for use by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.