• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

FAIR

  • Find Answers
  • Blog
  • Media & Apps
  • Conference
  • Bookstore
  • Archive
  • About
  • Get Involved
  • Search

Joseph Smith

Legal Trials of the Prophet: Joseph Smith’s Life in Court

Start Here

Question
Did Joseph Smith face many lawsuits and criminal charges?
 
Short Answer
Yes. During his lifetime, Joseph Smith was involved in approximately 175 legal proceedings, including civil lawsuits, criminal prosecutions, extradition attempts, bankruptcy proceedings, property disputes, and cases connected to the growth of the Church. According to Joseph Smith Papers research discussed by Joseph I. Bentley, roughly 50 of those cases involved criminal charges that could have threatened Joseph’s liberty or even his life.
Key Takeaways
  • Joseph Smith’s prophetic ministry was marked by continual legal opposition, with approximately 175 legal proceedings documented during his lifetime.
  • Many of the legal cases reflected broader religious, political, and social conflicts rather than ordinary criminal activity.
  • Early court proceedings, including the 1826 “glass looker” hearing and the 1830 New York trials, ended with Joseph Smith being discharged or acquitted according to the evidence presented.
  • Bentley argues that Joseph Smith’s life cannot be fully understood without recognizing how deeply legal conflict shaped his ministry, leadership, and ultimate sacrifice.

Summary

Summary

In “Legal Trials of the Prophet: Joseph Smith’s Life in Court,” Joseph I. Bentley examines the legal history of Joseph Smith’s ministry, arguing that the Prophet’s life cannot be understood apart from the nearly constant legal challenges he faced. Drawing on research from the Joseph Smith Papers Project and decades of legal scholarship, Bentley surveys approximately 175 legal proceedings involving Joseph Smith, including criminal prosecutions, civil lawsuits, extradition attempts, financial disputes, and municipal legal controversies. He demonstrates that these cases consumed enormous amounts of Joseph’s time and resources while often reflecting the growing religious, political, and social tensions surrounding the Restoration.

Chronological Legal Journey

The presentation follows Joseph Smith’s legal journey chronologically, beginning with the 1826 “glass looker” hearing and continuing through the New York trials, the Kirtland Safety Society litigation, the breakdown of law in Missouri, Liberty Jail, the Nauvoo Charter, multiple extradition attempts, and the legal controversy surrounding the Nauvoo Expositor. Bentley highlights how legal institutions sometimes protected Joseph through acquittals and successful habeas corpus proceedings, while at other times failed to restrain mob violence and political hostility.

Law + Faith

Bentley also explores the intersection of law and faith. He shows how Joseph Smith continued to build the Church, receive revelation, and press forward with temple work despite repeated arrests, financial hardship, imprisonment, and threats on his life. The revelations received in Liberty Jail stand as a powerful example of how profound spiritual insight emerged from periods of intense legal persecution.

Ultimately, Bentley concludes that Joseph Smith’s legal experiences were not merely historical footnotes but central to understanding his prophetic mission and martyrdom. By placing the Prophet’s court cases within their historical and legal context, the presentation illustrates both the extraordinary pressures Joseph endured and the resilience with which he continued to lead the Restoration despite persistent opposition.

TL;DR

TL;DR (Too Long; Didn’t Read)

Joseph I. Bentley examines the major legal challenges Joseph Smith faced throughout his life, from his 1826 hearing in New York to the events leading to his martyrdom in 1844. Drawing on research from the Joseph Smith Papers Project, Bentley argues that legal conflict was a constant feature of Joseph’s ministry and often reflected broader religious, political, and social tensions.

The presentation explores early court cases, Missouri persecutions, Liberty Jail, the Nauvoo Charter, extradition attempts, the Nauvoo Expositor, and the final legal events preceding Carthage. Bentley concludes that Joseph Smith’s life cannot be understood without understanding the extraordinary legal pressures he endured.

Note About the Slides in this Presentation

Note on Visuals:

The original slides from Brother Bentley’s presentation were not not good quality. The visuals included here were sharpened using AI. Every effort has been made to accurately reflect the speaker’s intent; however, any errors or oversimplifications are our own.

Download the Paper

Click to Download

 Introduction: Joseph Smith and the Legal Trials of His Life

Well, have you learned enough about Adam? I don’t believe I’ve heard that much in my whole life. And I’m looking forward to reading it again.

But we also need to know more and think more about the spiritual father of our own time. And so I hope you’re not tired of hearing about Joseph Smith. We’ll have some unique aspects here today that we can consider.

But first we look back on last year and we see that it was really quite a time for Joseph. Before 2005, I suspect that Brigham Young was far better known than Joseph Smith, certainly to historians and to those who read western books.

But 2005 changed all of that. Starting with a series of seminars, the Library of Congress being most notable, studies of Joseph went around the world literally. He made the cover of Time and Newsweek magazines. Wonderful books were written during the year.

Claudia Bushman, who’s been here throughout the day, actually was one of those responsible for mounting a heroic bronze statue in a very prominent place in a park in Manhattan, of all places.

So he is now being known for good and evil throughout the world as he never has been before.

Well, from my years of research, as you’ve just heard, I’ve gained a new and deeper appreciation for what he had to endure despite years of unrelenting legal proceedings.

A Life Shadowed by Legal Proceedings

Let’s do this.

Now he, as you know, faced many tribulations throughout his life and, in fact, his ministry was shadowed the entire time through a series of legal proceedings which resulted in his incarceration and ultimately his death.

The team that I’m on with the Joseph Smith Papers, and some of the members are here in our group, have identified approximately 175 lawsuits that he was involved in in one way or another—suits brought against him, or that he had to bring against others, or that he was a witness in some cases, or as judge.

Yes, in Nauvoo he was the presiding judge of the municipal court and was the justice of the peace for the mayor’s court.

So all of these took time and assets and a great deal of attention. Any of you who have ever been involved in a lawsuit, or have friends or family who have been, know that it is draining, totally all-consuming.

Lawyers spend night and day preparing for their cases. And while it was different 150 years ago—you could have a charge brought one day and the case heard the same day or the next day—still, it was a very demanding process.

We’ll focus just a little bit. Now, this is a panoramic survey. Really, we don’t have time to spend a lot of detail on any of these cases.

But there were approximately 50 cases which he had to defend that were brought against him as criminal charges that could have taken his liberty or his life and actually finally did.

Early Warnings and Afflictions

From the very beginning, the Lord warned Joseph when he was called to the ministry that he would need to be patient in his afflictions, for he would have many, and that he should keep the commandments and he would be glorified even if he should be slain.

And finally, “even if they should do unto you as they have done unto me, blessed are you, for you will be crowned with glory.”

Now, that’s quite a way to start your mission.

He said he got used to swimming in deep water, and that was certainly true from the legal aspect.

The 1826 “Glass Looker” Case

The first of the cases brought against Joseph actually started the year before his ministry. You might say his ministry actually began when Moroni visited and then brought the plates.

Here he is at age 20 in 1826. And this is a rather notable case. A lot of print has been spilled on this case, and it’s thought by some even today that it turned out badly for Joseph.

There are three accounts of this case, and two of them were by medical doctors who were bystanders, and one was by the justice himself, the justice of the peace who kept some notes.

His niece inherited those, and they were finally published about 50 years later during the peak of the polygamy persecutions.

This case came in Harmony when he was living in Harmony, Pennsylvania. That’s one of several oxymorons that I’ll mention here.

And earlier someone mentioned the cases, the documents that have been found in a basement in a New York jail.

A justice of the peace named Neely first made a record of People versus Joseph Smith and described him as the “glass looker.”

Now, that was not the criminal charge, but actually it was a form of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor under the statute of the time. It was for falsely pretending to discover lost goods.

Now, in one of the versions, actually the one that the niece inherited from the justice, the way it supposedly comes out is that he was arrested, posted bail, jumped bail, had to be rearrested, brought back, was convicted, and then either exiled or allowed to escape.

Treasure Digging for Spanish Gold

Joseph himself, before we get to Constable DeZeng, kept an account saying that for some period during this winter of 1826, he and his father were hired by Josiah Stowell, who had an old Spanish treasure map and knew that these men were good hard workers, but also heard that Joseph had some supernatural gifts—the ability to discover things that had been lost.

After about a month of working hard looking for this treasure, Joseph, according to his mother’s history, finally discouraged Josiah Stowell and he gave the whole thing up.

While they didn’t discover that buried treasure, he discovered his greatest treasure in life, which was his wife Emma. He was then living with the Hales.

Now, according to Dr. Purple, one of the two medical doctors who also published his version of this, what Constable DeZeng actually meant by what he said here—serving a warrant on Joseph and 12 witnesses and then attending with the prisoner for two days and then 10 miles of travel with a mittimus to take him—wasn’t to take him out of the jurisdiction and exile or expel him, but to take him to the hearing. 1

Now, the result of this, according to Dr. Purple, is that these 12 witnesses testified, including Joseph and his father and Josiah Stowell and several others.

Josiah Stowell’s Testimony

Stowell was the last witness, and he was supposed to clinch the case for the one who brought the charges, a disgruntled nephew who thought that Joseph was cheating his uncle.

But Josiah Stowell turned the tables and came to Joseph’s defense, vindicated him as a hard worker who never did what he wasn’t paid to do.

And so he was discharged according to Dr. Purple.

We think that he was vindicated and discharged. Gordon Madsen has spent a lot of time studying this case, and he has 10 other reasons why he thinks he was acquitted and not convicted.

This was the first case and the closest call, you might say, to a criminal conviction.

The 1830 Arrests Following the First Baptisms

The next year, Joseph received the plates. The ministry begins at age 21, and the next case is the following year.

There is not time to discuss the intricacies of that case, a very interesting case. We know that the first 116 pages were lost. They were taken by Martin Harris to show people that had to be convinced that he was not wasting his time or money.

One of those was his wife, Lucy Harris. And as it turns out, she’s the one who sues Joseph for cheating her husband. But I won’t get into that one.

The Church is now restored in April of 1830, and just two months later—and we have the priesthood restored and the first baptisms, which did not include Emma, as she was still back at Disharmony, or Harmony, Pennsylvania.

And so Joseph goes down to baptize her and the Joseph Knight family and several others in the same area.

So this next case comes when they had just completed the baptisms. The mob, about 50 vigilantes, had torn out a dam where they had performed the baptisms, and they were successful in disrupting the confirmations.

Joseph once said that you might as well baptize a bale of hay as to baptize a person without the confirmation for the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Now a constable came with a writ to arrest Joseph for, again, disorderly conduct, disturbing the peace, and this time it includes setting the countryside in an uproar by preaching the Book of Mormon.

A Courageous Constable

Now the constable was part of a plan to do some harm to Joseph. He was supposed to get Joseph away from his friends and put him in a wagon. Then, as they got out of sight around a bend, he was to slow down. So, those who were lying in wait could come out and ambush him.

But as so often happened, the constable was impressed by Joseph. He actually came to like him and was impressed that he was not at all what he had been told.

So, instead of slowing the wagon down as they came around that bend, he whipped the horses into a faster pace. They were making good time as they ran away from the mob, who were now saddling up and trying to come in hot pursuit.

The wagon loses a wheel just at this moment, though. I’m not making this up.

So Joseph is propping up the wagon while the constable is putting the wheel back on, and here comes the mob riding as fast as they can.

They get back in the wagon. These must have been really good horses because they outran the mob, and they get to the end where the court will be held the next day.

Lack of Formal Courthouses

Back in those days they didn’t have really formal courthouses for the most part. They were held in justice of the peace parlors. Or, if it needed a larger place, then in a tavern or an inn. And that’s where they went this time.

I mentioned that this constable was quite courageous because he not only ran away from the mob, but he told Joseph:

“Now there’s only one bed in this room. You take the bed. I’ll lie here on the floor with my musket beside me, and I’ll prop my feet against the door so they can’t get in and you can try to get a good night’s sleep.”

The First Trial

The court started the next morning at 10:00 a.m. This is about midnight now. Okay, you hadn’t prepared your case. You hardly know what the case is. But Joseph Smith so often relied on others to finance these defenses and to bring these lawsuits.

Two farmer friends of the Knight family, John Reid and James Davidson, who also happened to be lawyers, were impressed into duty.

So at 10:00 the next morning, the court begins. And again, twelve witnesses, similar charges to what he had before. And it had nothing to do with treasure seeking this time. It was just:

  • general disorderly conduct,
  • vagrancy statutes,
  • lack of visible means of support.

This went on till about midnight, and Justice Chamberlain uttered those words that they waited to hear:

“Not guilty.”

Immediately as they walked out the front door of the courthouse—or the little tavern—John Reid, the attorney, said that they were seized by some fiends from hell from the next county over.

So the case is not over. Now it’s time to go to Colesville, Broome County.

The Second Trial in Colesville

Well, this constable is not nearly as considerate as the last one. He actually chained himself to Joseph. He fed him bread and water, and that’s all he had.

And as they tried to rest, whenever Joseph would move, he would jerk him to make sure he wasn’t trying to get away.

Now this time the charges are very similar. Except they added to it “casting out a devil” as a version of disorderly conduct.

Newel Knight was the recipient of that benefit.

And one of the questions that was put to Knight as they had this exchange was:

“Well, Mr. Knight, is it true that the devil was cast out of you?”

And he said, “Well, that’s correct.”

“Well then, did you see the devil?”

“Yes, sir, I did.”

“Well, would you please describe the devil to this court?”

He said, “Well, maybe I could first ask you a question.”

There’s objection, of course, and, “You need to answer the question.”

He says,

“I’ll answer the question if you’ll first answer my question. Do you believe in spiritual things that cannot be seen with a visible eye?”

And he said,

“Well, of course not. I’m a lawyer.”

And so he said,

“Well, then it would do no good to describe the devil to you because it would only be discerned by those who can see things spiritually.”

So they changed the subject and went on with 40 other witnesses.

Josiah Stowell came back, and many others.

Forty Hours of Testimony

And this went on for 18 hours. So it’s now been a total of 40 hours in a period of two days. And again, the result this time from a three-judge panel was “Not guilty.”

So this time the disgruntled participants decided that they needed to administer their own version of rough justice.

So they’re out front fashioning something to apply their own version to Joseph. And the two lawyers, and by now the repentant constable and the judge, hatch a plan.

So what they’ll do: one lawyer will go out front with the constable and detain the mob, while the other lawyer and the judge will go to the back room, open the window, and let Joseph and Oliver out through the woods.

And so they run the rest of the night, arriving home the remaining 15 miles, totally exhausted and ready to get out of New York.

Leaving New York

I guess although Joseph was exonerated in both trials, malicious rumors came to Emma’s parents, and they invited them to leave.

They basically disowned Emma and Joseph, and she never saw her parents again.

So here is where all of this happened. Harmony is the lower dot, and then just across the border is South Bainbridge, and Colesville is right next to it.

Palmyra is upstate, as you know.

The Move to Ohio

I didn’t mean to hit that one quite yet.

So it’s now time to start the westward movement. On New Year’s Day of 1831, the Lord told Joseph it’s time to go to Ohio, and there He will endow him with power and reveal the law of the Lord.

So now we’re in Ohio, and how did things go there?

During the seven years that Joseph and most of the Saints lived in Ohio, things went very well. The lawsuits that they brought and defended were done very successfully, but there were more suits there than anywhere during Joseph’s life.

A total of 66 if you count all the suits against the Kirtland Temple Committee.

Legal Successes in Kirtland

And these are just a few examples, ranging from performing marriages without a license to having to evict an armed mob from the temple.

They were charged with riot and assault. This is Joseph Sr. and some of the other family members, and they were acquitted by a justice of the peace named Oliver CCowdery, which was helpful.

The next week there was an arson of the printing press and the bookbindery next door.

Some mob was brought in, and not all cases were brought successfully. They did not have sufficient evidence to convict those five men.

The Kirtland Safety Society

The most serious case, though—the business disaster of Joseph’s life—involved another oxymoron: the Kirtland Safety Society. 2

This is a copy of the bank note that I have in my possession, March 9, 1837.

Now, this resulted from very difficult times on the western frontier. Credit was tight. Many banks were being formed that could issue their own bank notes so that there was more currency.

And like the others, the Saints got their own bank and got their press and started printing their notes. But unlike the others, they did not get a license. It was denied to them at the very last minute.

So they just stamped “Anti-Banking Safety Society,” and that was not quite sufficient.

A private suit was brought against them for banking without a license.

Six Lawsuits in a Single Day

And before I get to this, I need to tell you about while they were waiting for the case to be heard.

On the 27th of July, six suits were brought the same day against Joseph. And four of the six were actually heard that same day.

Here’s how he described the last thing that happened during the day as they were leaving town, having disposed of five of these:

“At sunset, I got into my son’s carriage to return home. At this moment, the sheriff sprang into our carriage, seized my lines, and served another writ on me, sworn out by a man who just a few weeks previous had brought a new-fashioned cooking stove to Kirtland and wished me to test it for him.”

That man thought that now would be a good time to get paid for it.

“I had to give my watch up to the officer for security, and then we all returned home.”

And as far as we know, he did not go through Painesville again. He found a way to circumvent Painesville, having endured that much harassment.

The Aftermath of the Safety Society Case

Now the next October is when this Safety Society case was heard.

It was apparently resolved against Joseph and some of the other officers, but they appealed the case. And while it was still pending, they moved from Ohio to Missouri.

It finally ended up in a default judgment against the assets of the Church that remained at that time. Through a various sequence of things, that included the Kirtland Temple. And some 25 years later, through this suit, it actually passed hands to the present owners in possession of the temple.

Often a charge that’s made against Joseph and the Saints is that the reason they fled out of Kirtland the way they did was to avoid their debts.

And it’s true that they were huge. $52,000 back then was a huge amount. 3

But Gordon Madsen and Jeff Walker, who work on our team, have determined that over 90% of that was paid, much of it long after they had left Ohio and their beloved temple.

Missouri: From Courts to Mob Rule

So now it’s on to Missouri. And you can see that this is a sweep across six states. How did things go in Missouri? Well, not very well.

We call it mob rule. They called it people in action, popular sovereignty.

The Mormons were very unpopular for a lot of reasons in Missouri.

  • They were considered religious fanatics.
  • They were taking the place over, coming in very large numbers.
  • They felt threatened in every possible way.
  • But the last straw was probably the fact that they were Northerners in a slave state.

The Destruction of the Morning and Evening Star

And in July of 1833, the publisher of the Morning and Evening Star published an issue describing the requirements for bringing freed-state slaves into Missouri.

The Missourians did not take kindly to that. This was an affront to their culture. It was certainly not illegal to bring freed slaves there, but they did not take well to that.

And so they took some matters into their own hands and decided that they would do this to the press and to the entire building. They dragged Bishop Partridge around. They tarred and feathered him, dragged him around the town square.

A Hollow Court Victory

So, the closest that the Church came to any success in court while they were in Missouri the entire time—and they brought many cases.

None were ever brought against them, by the way. There was no need. They simply took things into their own hands.

But the closest the Church came was when Bishop Partridge and W. W. Phelps sued the perpetrators of this civic action. And they went to court. And as usual, the defendants claimed self-defense.

The lawyers properly pointed out that there were two men against about 200. And that’s not much of a self-defense. So the judge had to agree that that’s correct.

And on the merits, then, they were upheld on their arguments. But they were awarded a total of one penny plus a peppercorn, which is the legal equivalent of an insult.

In other words, “We agree with you. You’re right on the law and on the merits, but get out. We don’t like you.”

Expulsion from Missouri

So from Jackson County they were expelled that same year. Actually, they were expelled twice from Missouri:

  • once from Jackson County,
  • and then later from the entire state.

These other locations were all really quite friendly to them.

Clay County, Ray County, Caldwell County was a county formed for themselves. It was a quarantine for the Mormons. Go there and maybe people won’t bother you if you stay put.

But they kept going, and many settled in Daviess County. So that was formed in that territory.

The Road to Liberty Jail

They formed Daviess County. And the real trouble that put Joseph in Liberty Jail (there’s another oxymoron) was Election Day in Daviess County. The first election in Gallatin. We won’t go through all of the details there.

But the short of it was Joseph and about 15 others had heard that after the Election Day riots, some of the Mormons were killed and left to rot, and no one could move the bodies. They would be picked clean by the buzzards.

And they did not take well to that. So they retaliated in a form that was peaceable, all parties thought. And yet they were sued and brought before an old enemy of theirs named Austin A. King from Jackson County.

And this was the beginning, really, of the so-called Mormon War of 1838.

The 1838 Mormon War and the Extermination Order

Through a series of events, this then resulted in the Extermination Order of October 27th. Almost everything really bad after Jackson County happened in a three-month period in 1838.

Here is Governor Boggs’s order to the commander of the Northern Militia after several hearings and false affidavits from disaffected leaders of the Church.

And here’s the famous statement:

“The Mormons must be treated as enemies and exterminated or driven from the state.”

That was rescinded, by the way, in 1976, exactly 30 years ago, by Governor Bond.

Haun’s Mill and the Fall of Far West

Now, just three days later, we had the Haun’s Mill Massacre. Then we had the siege of Far West on Halloween Day, appropriately, just the next day.

It wasn’t enough to have the Haun’s Mill Massacre. Now we need to surround the city and threaten total destruction of the entire city and everyone in it unless peace could be made.

And through various means, Joseph was captured with Hyrum and several of the leaders. They were ordered to be shot the next day.

Their former lawyer, who defended them in some of this action there in Missouri, Alexander Doniphan, was the one commanded to shoot them at the town square at noon the next day.

His answer was:

“What you have ordered is cold-blooded murder, and I will not perform it. And should you do that, I will see you brought before the judgment bar of God. So help me God.”

And so he backed down and remanded everyone over to that same Austin King. He then saw that they had a comfortable lodging in Richmond and then in Liberty.

Liberty Jail

Now, Liberty, of course, was a horrible place. But it was a bigger jail than they had anywhere else in Missouri at that time.

And so that’s where they spent almost six months. The worst six months of Joseph’s life, I would say, the longest time he was incarcerated. The entire First Presidency of the Church was in jail.

And why wasn’t the Twelve in jail? Well, because they were considered irrelevant.

A Prison and a Sacred Place

While Joseph was there, though, in this horrible prison, a dungeon of a prison, he also considered it a sacred place. And some of the most inspiring revelations came while he was there.

He wrote a 16-page letter home that became Sections 121, 122, and 123 of the Doctrine and Covenants.

And if you ever feel sorry for yourself:

  • feel like life is not fair
  • and it’s not treating you right
  • and it should do you better

read any of those sections and you’ll have a second thought.

Many of the lessons Joseph learned endured through the end and sustained him in Illinois.

The Saints Flee Missouri

Now, leadership, such as it was, was being provided by the Twelve. And who was the head of the Twelve after Thomas B. Marsh was gone?

Well, Brigham Young. And he had the experience of the first mass evacuation of the Saints. He was in charge, and they went east.

The thought was always to go west, but circumstances did not allow that. Joseph had talked about it. Brigham had planned for it. It was not to be. They went east, back across the river to Quincy, where again kind people received them.

Joseph Escapes and Rejoins the Saints

Well, now Joseph gets to escape during a change of venue from Liberty up to Boone County.

He finally gets to this new settlement that had been arranged by Brigham and Joseph and several others, this bend in the river.

And we know much about that. It’s not so much legal as physical and spiritual.

Nauvoo and a New Beginning

The next year, 1840, was probably Joseph’s best year of his life. He didn’t have a single lawsuit all year. He was out of jail.

They did not have a lot of success going to D.C. to get some redress from the federal government. But they got the Nauvoo Charter before the end of that year. And this was an amazing thing.

Three other cities had similar charters. But none of them implemented it quite as effectively as Nauvoo did.

They were basically given their own army, a local militia 3,000 strong. The Nauvoo Legion was the terror of southern Illinois. Now, it was never utilized except for ceremonial things, but it was always armed and dangerous, ready for action. Joseph saw to that, and this was well known.

The Power of Habeas Corpus

They were given their own independent judiciary.

And legally speaking, this is probably the most important thing in the city charter. Because they had the power of habeas corpus, which simply means if you’re arrested by somebody that you think is going to kill you or do you some serious harm, you send word.

You have one of your colleagues go to the nearest court that has this power. And that court can issue a writ of habeas corpus, which means stop everything. “Bring the body here”. We want to talk to this prisoner to see if he’s been falsely arrested and see what this is all about.

So, it’s a chance to have a second examination.

And this was used effectively over and over by Joseph, much to the chagrin of the neighbors, and was the main reason they wanted to repeal the Nauvoo Charter.

A City-State on the Mississippi

They were given their own mayor, John C. Bennett. (That’s another story.)

We have a city council. We even had a University of Nauvoo. This was really a very complete program. A little city-state is what we had in Nauvoo.

John C. Bennett and William Law

And legally things went very, very well. Starting with this man, John C. Bennett, who started off quite well. He was given some great promises in Section 124, but all of them were highly conditional.

And as it turns out, he was a saintly scoundrel. He was Joseph’s Judas.

Now, he was companioned with this man, who went to the First Presidency the very same week that John C. Bennett became the mayor. These two were kindred spirits.

And Joseph later, one week before he died, said that “all of our sorrows as a family have arisen through the influence of that one man.”

I had always attributed more to John C. Bennett than I had to William Law.

The man was converted to the gospel by John Taylor, who later said he was one of the most calculating and deceptive, but gracious and courteous, men that you would ever meet.

Internal Corrosion in Nauvoo

So we’ll put him out of the picture for now. Back to better things.

Those two were the start of the internal corrosion that finally brought the end of the Saints, Joseph, and Nauvoo.

But they were successful in electing their own man for governor. A good-looking man, very fair Supreme Court justice, far better than any governor they’d had before, Tom Ford.

Stephen A. Douglas and the First Extradition Case

They also were treated well judicially. Here’s Stephen A. Douglas. He’s the one on your right, not the left. This habeas corpus was not only used in Nauvoo, but it was also effectively applied when they were outside of Nauvoo.

On one occasion, Joseph was seized on the old writs that I told you about when they were still in Missouri. He left under the cover of night and got back across the river. So now they wanted him extradited back to Missouri.

Joseph had good legal counsel that made an effective case before Judge Douglas, and he acquitted Joseph. Joseph thanked him and then later blessed him and prophesied some famous things.

He said:

“Judge, you’re a good man. You’ve been a friend of the Saints. The day will come that you will aspire to the presidency of the United States. But if you should ever lift your hand against me or the Latter-day Saint people, the Almighty, you will feel the weight of the hand of the Almighty upon you, and you will remember this conversation to your final days.”

This was the first extradition case, and it did happen just that way when, in 1860, he ran against Lincoln. He was highly favored. Lincoln was a nobody, and Douglas finished fourth in a field of four.

The Steamboat Case and Joseph’s Bankruptcy

Now, not all the cases turned out well. The one that Elder Oaks and I researched for 10 years, starting when I was a third-year student at the University of Chicago Law School, started off harmlessly enough.

It was a simple business transaction in 1840 at Commerce.

Joseph and Hyrum and two others, including the Presiding Bishop, cosigned as guarantors for a businessman’s obligation to buy a steamboat.

The one who sold the steamboat was Robert E. Lee, who was then in charge of the river engineers to dredge the Mississippi.

With tensions growing over the war with Mexico, Lee was sent east to West Point and to New York Harbor, I should say. And he was told to auction off all of his equipment.

So the Mormons bought it. This was to be the first Mormon enterprise.

Unfortunately, before the note for $5,000 came due the next spring, the steamboat was sunk, and with it sank the fortunes of Joseph Smith financially.

The Bankruptcy Proceedings

About the same time that note came due, a bankruptcy law was passed. The first bankruptcy law in the history of the world where a person could go in and voluntarily rid himself of his own debts. And Joseph was amazed.

But the lawyer said, “It’s true. Everyone’s doing it. All of the people that owe you money are getting discharged. So you need to do this to protect yourself.”

So Joseph and about 26 others went to Springfield and they filed for bankruptcy. And all the others were released. Joseph was the only one that was singled out to not receive a discharge in bankruptcy.

And the reason was this same obligation.

By now, Robert E. Lee is writing letters saying, “I’m a little embarrassed. The note wasn’t paid. I thought it was well secured. The only one left now is Joseph Smith, who is thought to have the most assets. So, hold him back.”

The one who did that was the U.S. Attorney in Illinois, Justin Butterfield.

And I’ll tell you something about the second extradition case in just a minute that involved Butterfield and the judge who had jurisdiction over bankruptcy, Judge Pope, who was thought to be the best federal judge in Illinois.

The Second Extradition Case

That case came up at the end of 1842. All through May of 1842, a fellow named Boggs was shot in Missouri, and Orin Porter Rockwell was seized and put in jail.

They asked him later if he’s the one who shot Boggs, and he said, “He’s still alive. How could I be the one that shot him? He wouldn’t be alive if I had anything to do with it.”

So writs went out at Boggs’s request.

John C. Bennett was involved. Joseph was to be arrested and hauled back to Missouri as an accomplice before the fact, and Rockwell being the one who pulled the trigger.

It was never proved, but he was in hiding most of that year.

And finally, at the end of the year, he and Governor Ford arranged something where he could go before Judge Pope in the second extradition case and be heard.

And his lawyer, as I say, was Justin Butterfield.

Justin Butterfield’s Defense

Now, Butterfield was quite an effective advocate, as we’ll see. Judge Pope was a good, fair judge, and this was the most notorious case up to then in the history of Illinois.

This was the case to send the Mormon prophet back to Missouri, and everyone knew if he went back, he would be killed. So the town turned out for this show. The courtroom was absolutely packed.

And so the judge said, “I’ll invite all the women in the room to come up and sit by me.” So there were chairs up front in this big, beautiful courthouse. And so all the women are up front, including Mary Todd Lincoln.

So Butterfield, in his opening remarks, steps forward and addresses Judge Pope in this way:

“Your Honor, I come before the judge in the presence of these angels to defend the prophet of the Lord,”

which he did.

And that was a very successful case.

The Third Attempted Extradition

Not quite as happy was the third attempted extradition. Boggs was no longer able to do anything. That was decided by Judge Pope. But now they get a reindictment for those old Missouri charges.

And now Governor Ford agrees that Constable Wilson from Carthage can join with Constable Reynolds from Missouri, and they can take care of Joseph in their own way.

So they happened to seize Joseph while he’s out of his safe harbor in Nauvoo, up visiting family in Dixon in July of 1843.

The word came back in a very hurried way that Joseph had been seized and he was being bundled off to Missouri, and he may even be kidnapped and bound and gagged and on the river as they spoke.

So they sent the Maid of Iowa up and down the river to stop all the boats and search them to see if he was already on board.

And others went by land, out scurrying around.

The Nauvoo Legion Responds

But it was Hyrum who got the Nauvoo Legion mobilized, and they came out in force.

And so what we have here is these two constables who have Joseph in their custody, and the constables are in the custody of the Nauvoo Legion.

So the prisoners are prisoners of the prisoners.

And they all go marching back to Nauvoo except Joseph and Emma, who get to have a nice carriage ride. And when they reach Nauvoo, he goes to court. Of course, the habeas corpus does the usual job, and he is exonerated.

So that’s the third attempt. But at this point, things are really boiling over.

This is July 1843. This is when the word goes out that the Mormons are beyond the law. There is no way that you could ever get Joseph to answer for all his crimes and his past misbehavior as long as that city charter is protecting them.

Building the Temple Amid Increasing Opposition

Now, the other side of Joseph’s spiritual life, though, was focused primarily on the temple.

With all of these other escapades going on in the background, and fearing for his own safety and his well-being, he still pressed ahead with all that he had to build the temple.

And this was a five-year process.

He did not see it through to conclusion.

The King Follett Discourse

But his last general conference was the first week in April 1844. And this is when he preached his monumental King Follett Discourse and had so many spiritual experiences.

It was a beautiful, gorgeous spring day. They were out of doors on the banks of the river. The flowers were budding and the birds were singing.

And Joseph called this “the best and most glorious five consecutive days ever enjoyed by this generation.”

But then later, as he passed the temple on his way to Carthage, he said:

“This is the loveliest place and the best people on earth. Little do they know the trials that await them.”

The Nauvoo Expositor and the Road to Carthage

Well, here are the trials.

Just within days, a trio of brothers were excommunicated. Some already were out, actually.

And this was the Laws, two brothers, the Higbees, who were sons of one of Joseph’s dearest friends, Judge Elias Higbee, who was a revered and honorable man, and then two others, the Fosters.

And right now, one of the projects I have with the Joseph Smith Papers team is to trace a series of suits that these and other disaffected members brought against Joseph that whole year of 1844.

The Reformed Church and the Printing Press

But in April, just after general conference, they, now being cut off from the Church, met and organized their own reformed church with William Law as the president, Wilson as a counselor, and the Fosters were apostles—or one of the Higbees, one of the Fosters.

The next thing they did was to acquire a printing press.

And Francis Higbee said, “We’ll do this so that we’ll cause its own destruction. We want the press destroyed because the moment they lay a hand on the press”—this is his quote—”that will mark the downfall of Joseph Smith and all of Nauvoo.”

Very prophetic.

Now, this was the culmination, as I say, of this series of harassing suits. There were a dozen suits in 1844, all for the purpose of hauling Joseph out of Nauvoo to Carthage, where he could be killed in one way or another.

Joseph in Carthage One Month Earlier

So exactly one month to the day before he was killed, he was in Carthage answering some of these suits.

There were two grand jury indictments, and Francis Higbee had two other cases going, and three other disaffected members you wouldn’t even recognize had suits all going against Joseph at the same time.

So here he is at this Hamilton House, and we’ll get back to that in a little minute here. This is the only hotel in town.

The proprietor at first was thought to be unfriendly to the Mormons because, well, this is Carthage and everyone hates the Mormons here, and he had the patronage of his own people as well as those from out of town.

As we’ll see, though, he was a bit of a hero in his own right, Mr. Hamilton.

On the 27th of May, Joseph was there with Hyrum and others answering these charges, and he was warned that there was a conspiracy afoot to kill him.

The next day he would go to court, and either before or during or afterwards, Joseph Jackson was there with his arms and ammunition, and there were others that were prepared to kill him.

So now Samuel Smith, a member of the city council, gets into action with Hyrum, and they gather the friendly troops, well armed, and they escort Joseph to court.

The case is put over for lack of a witness, and they go back peaceably to Nauvoo.

But they learned, and their enemies learned, some key lessons from that experience.

One month later, of course, he’s back here again, and this house became not only an inn but also a mortuary for Joseph and Hyrum.

The Nauvoo Expositor Crisis

Now, I mentioned that the printing press came. And it was for the purpose of printing as many newspapers as necessary to cause its own destruction. And this didn’t take long.

On June 7th, the one and only issue was printed. The publishers were named right in the paper: the two Laws, the two Fosters, the two Higbees.

The editor was Sylvester Emmons, who actually was a non-member, and he was part of the city council. And Charles Ivins, who’s a distant relative of mine. My middle name is Ivins.

In any case, the city council took this very seriously.

  • They called their best legal counsel.
  • They consulted the legal authorities of the time.
  • They reviewed the cases.
  • They reviewed their own statutes, the State of Illinois, the First Amendment, Blackstone on Law from the Laws of England, the common law.

And their advice was that if they did not suppress the Expositor, there would be a riot, and there would be bloodshed, and there would be commotion. The whole town would be in turmoil. They took it very seriously.

And this issue, while we would read it today and say, “Well, this isn’t so bad,” they thought it was. So the best course, they thought, based on their legal advice, was to suppress it as a public nuisance. And this was done four days later, on the 11th of June.

Arrest Warrants and Habeas Corpus

Now, it didn’t take long to get a warrant for the arrest of Joseph and Hyrum and the entire city council. This writ was sworn out by Francis Higbee in Carthage, and a constable from Carthage, who Joseph called a very wrathful person, came.

And he was wrathful because Joseph said, “Well, we’ll go to our favorite court and have a habeas corpus hearing.”

And so that’s what they did, and the usual result occurred.

At this point, the editor of the Warsaw Signal—now we always think of Carthage because that’s where he was killed. But the real trouble came out of Warsaw, and it was largely because of the editor of the Warsaw Signal.

The same day that they had this habeas corpus hearing where everyone was exonerated, he called for the extermination of all Mormon leaders.

So this is bad.

Judge Jesse Thomas and the Final Hearing

The presiding judge of Illinois for that area at the time was a very great man, as Joseph described him, named Jesse Thomas.

And he said, “Now you’ve gone through your habeas corpus motions, and you see where it got you. I strongly urge you to have a full trial on the merits with witnesses, the whole nine yards, before a non-Mormon outside of Nauvoo.”

And he recommended Daniel H. Wells, who was a very prominent jurist and lived just outside of Nauvoo. And so at his rather stately home, a hearing was held.

He later did join the Church and went with the pioneers west and became Brigham Young’s counselor for 30 years.

But at the end of a very long day, the same decision was reached, and the entire city council was exonerated.

Now the Signal calls for the extermination of all Mormons everywhere in Illinois.

Forces Gathering Against Nauvoo

So here are the principal groups that are bringing this about.

It all starts and, in some ways, ultimately finishes with these three sets of brothers and others, the apostate group. Then we’ve got the media under the charge of this friendly fellow, Thomas Sharp, the Warsaw Signal.

What did he have against Joseph and the Mormons?

Well, I’m indebted to Brother Bushman for this little note in his book. We’re not really sure. He has no great history of this. He bought a losing newspaper, and I’m sure he felt that selling papers was his first charge.

And if you turn people against the Mormons and stir things up, that’ll sell a lot of newspapers. It always does.

Bad news will do that.

Joseph Smith and Thomas Sharp

But here’s something that Bushman put in his book. This is Joseph’s letter to him. He first invites Sharp to the groundbreaking of the Nauvoo Temple. They have a grand ceremony. Everybody’s very excited, and Joseph expects a wonderful column in the Warsaw Signal.

There’s Sharp right on the front row, grandstand seats. He’s wined and dined, literally, at the Smith home.

And then he goes back the next day and prints a very tame column.

He says,

“Well, they had a nice event, but I’m going to keep my eyes on those Mormons because they’re talking political things now. And if church and state are combined, I’m going to see that I can do all in my power to prevent that.”

So reading that, Joseph sends him this letter:

“Sir, you will discontinue my paper. Its contents are calculated to pollute me. To patronize your filthy sheet, that tissue of lies, that sink of iniquity, is disgraceful to any moral man. Yours with utter contempt, Joseph Smith.”

“P.S. Please publish the above in your contemptible paper.”

Well, he did.

Now, do you know anyone that ever won a name-calling contest with a newspaper editor?

So Sharp has his own revelation to give, and he says, “Yes, I will reveal that Joseph Smith has failed to pay for his subscription, the last that he has just cancelled.”

And so it went. The war was declared, and that’s Mr. Sharp.

The Final Days

Then, of course, we have the ever-lurking Missouri enemies.

Boggs is still there, and Bennett’s over there, and they’re stirring things up every way they know how, and they’re starting to come across the river.

Several ministers were very unhappy about the loss of some of their adherents to the Mormons. Actually, one of those who was tried for the murder was a very prominent Baptist minister.

Some politicians were also unhappy with the Mormons. Two of those were tried for the murder. They had been losing votes to the Mormons.

And then you had two businessmen who lost money to the Mormons in various ways. I won’t go into that.

So now things are reaching the end. The winding-up scene is near. Missourians are coming across in a big way, bringing arms, ammunition. Several large cannons seem to have been crossing the river. And then attacks are starting on the outlying settlements.

Joseph Appeals to Governor Ford

So now it’s time to get some help. And Joseph does two things.

One is to write a letter to Governor Ford saying, “You’ve never been to Nauvoo. You need to come and see this place for yourself and help me keep the peace.”

The second thing that he did as an interim measure was to declare martial law, which means it’s now under the charge of the Nauvoo Legion. They’ll keep an eye on everything that’s happening.

Everybody goes to bed at an early hour, off the streets, curfews, the whole thing. That turned out to be a very prudent but fateful move on Joseph’s part.

Conclusion

I cannot go there without emotion, and neither can you.

Well, today, as we go back to Nauvoo, we see that there are better times. That gorgeous temple has been rebuilt and was dedicated in 2002.

And we should all join where President Hinckley went back for that, as he has done so many other things, in saying:

“God be thanked for Joseph Smith and the greatest instrument of our restoration.” 4

The martyrs are in a place where “traitors and tyrants now fight them in vain.”5

Thank you.

Search topics

Joseph Smith legal trials; Joseph Smith lawsuits; Joseph Smith court cases; Joseph Smith criminal charges; Joseph Smith Papers Project; Legal Trials of the Prophet; Joseph I Bentley; glass looker trial; 1826 hearing; Josiah Stowell; South Bainbridge trial; Colesville trial; Newel Knight; Kirtland Safety Society; Kirtland legal cases; Missouri Mormon War; Liberty Jail; Missouri Extermination Order; Haun's Mill Massacre; Alexander Doniphan; Nauvoo Charter; habeas corpus Nauvoo; Nauvoo Legion; Stephen A Douglas and Joseph Smith; extradition cases; Judge Pope; Justin Butterfield; Robert E Lee steamboat case; bankruptcy proceedings; Nauvoo Expositor; Warsaw Signal; Thomas Sharp; Daniel H Wells; Jesse Thomas; Carthage Jail; Joseph Smith martyrdom; legal history of the Restoration

CES Letter; Mormon Church history; Mormon legal controversies; Joseph Smith criticism; anti-Mormon claims; Mormon origins criticism; LDS historical evidence; Mormon apologetics; Joseph Smith court records; Mormon persecution; Mormon Missouri conflict; Mormon Extermination Order; Joseph Smith arrest history; Mormon truth claims; Mormon historical documents; LDS Church history evidence; Mormon restoration claims; Mormon leadership controversies; Carthage conspiracy claims; Mormon historical criticism

FAQ / Common Questions

How many lawsuits was Joseph Smith involved in?

According to research cited by Joseph I. Bentley, Joseph Smith was involved in approximately 175 legal proceedings during his lifetime.

Was Joseph Smith ever convicted of a serious crime?

Bentley argues that Joseph Smith was acquitted, discharged, or otherwise cleared in many of the major criminal proceedings brought against him. The presentation discusses several early cases in New York and later extradition attempts that did not result in criminal convictions.

What was the 1826 "glass looker" case?

The 1826 hearing involved allegations related to treasure seeking and claims that Joseph Smith falsely pretended to discover lost goods. Bentley discusses evidence suggesting Joseph was discharged rather than convicted.

What was the Missouri Extermination Order?

Governor Lilburn W. Boggs issued Missouri Executive Order 44 on October 27, 1838, directing that Mormons be treated as enemies and driven from the state or exterminated. The order remained officially in effect until it was rescinded in 1976.

Why was Joseph Smith imprisoned in Liberty Jail?

Following the 1838 Missouri conflict, Joseph Smith and other Church leaders were arrested and held in Liberty Jail for nearly six months while awaiting legal proceedings.

What was the Nauvoo Charter?

The Nauvoo Charter granted the city significant municipal authority, including a local court system and the ability to issue writs of habeas corpus. These powers became a source of controversy among Nauvoo's opponents.

What was the Nauvoo Expositor?

The Nauvoo Expositor was a newspaper published by former Church members in June 1844. Its suppression by order of the Nauvoo City Council became a major factor in the events leading to Joseph Smith's arrest and death.

Why was Joseph Smith taken to Carthage Jail?

After charges connected to the destruction of the Nauvoo Expositor and subsequent accusations of treason, Joseph Smith surrendered to authorities and was confined in Carthage Jail, where he was killed by a mob on June 27, 1844.

Revised or Unaltered? Joseph Smith’s Foundational Stories

Jump to Transcript

Start Here

Question
Did Joseph Smith revise the First Vision story over time?

Short Answer
Critics sometimes claim that Joseph Smith changed his account of the First Vision and the coming forth of the Book of Mormon over time. This presentation argues that the historical evidence instead shows a consistent core narrative from the earliest accounts onward, while later retellings often expanded details or emphasized different aspects for different audiences.
Key Takeaways
  • Early eyewitness reports from Joseph Smith’s family and associates consistently describe an angelic visitation connected to golden plates and divine revelation.
  • Hostile newspaper accounts and critical sources often preserved authentic elements of Joseph Smith’s story even while attempting to reinterpret or ridicule it.
  • The presentation compares the 1832 and 1838 histories and argues that differences between them reflect incomplete narratives and differing purposes rather than fabrication.
  • Accusations involving money digging, folk magic, and Luman Walter are examined in historical context using eyewitness documents.
  • The speaker argues that many claims of “revisionism” are based on selective readings, incomplete documents, hostile reinterpretations, or natural variations in retelling.
  • The talk explores the multiple First Vision accounts and argues that they preserve a stable underlying narrative.
  • Revival activity near Palmyra and throughout western New York is examined as historical context for Joseph Smith’s religious questions.
  • Oliver Cowdery’s early church history writings are presented as evidence that early Church leaders were already familiar with the First Vision narrative.
  • The presentation also analyzes the literary and biblical structure of Joseph Smith’s 1832 First Vision account, including parallels to Acts 26 and Psalm 31.

Summary

Summary

This presentation analyzes accusations that Joseph Smith altered the stories of the Restoration over time, particularly the coming forth of the Book of Mormon and the First Vision. Using early eyewitness accounts, critical sources, newspaper reports, and manuscript comparisons, the speaker argues that Joseph Smith’s central storyline remained remarkably consistent from its earliest tellings. He contends that many alleged “revisions” actually stem from misunderstandings of incomplete documents, selective readings, or hostile reinterpretations created by critics.

A major focus of the talk is Joseph Smith’s 1832 history, including its relationship to later First Vision accounts and Book of Mormon narratives. The speaker proposes that the 1832 account was deliberately constructed using biblical frameworks and literary parallels, particularly from Acts 26 and Psalm 31. He also examines revival activity in the Palmyra region, Oliver Cowdery’s early historical writings, accusations involving money digging and Luman Walter, and the broader question of how historical memory becomes reshaped over time.

TL;DR

TL;DR (Too Long; Didn’t Read)

This talk argues that Joseph Smith’s accounts of the Book of Mormon and the First Vision did not evolve into entirely new stories over time. Instead, the speaker shows that early eyewitnesses, critics, and historical documents consistently preserve the same core narrative elements. The presentation also explores how later critics contributed to confusion through rumor, speculation, and selective interpretation of historical records.

Introduction

Critics of Joseph Smith have long claimed that the stories of the Restoration offered by him were revised over a period of time until they became what is known today as the accepted history of the Church. In my lecture this morning, I would like to examine some aspects of this claim of revisionism from a documentary perspective. 1

I will start by talking about the story of the coming forth of the Book of Mormon and then move into a discussion of the First Vision.

I have a very definite reason for addressing these topics in reverse historical order. This will become apparent as my lecture progresses. Please be aware that in my remarks today I will be utilizing several abbreviations such as:

  • JS1832, which refers to Joseph Smith’s 1832 history, and
  • JS1838, which refers to the manuscript that was published in 1842 and became the official history of the Church.

I will be presenting and summarizing a considerable amount of new research on both the story of the coming forth of the Book of Mormon and that of the First Vision. But it’s not nearly all that I have available at this time. It is my hope that you will find something in this material that will be useful in defending the prophet’s foundational stories from the critics of the Church.

The Earliest Book of Mormon Accounts

If a person wants to determine whether or not a story has changed over time, it is logical to first examine that story in its earliest known form. In the case of the Book of Mormon account, we are fortunate to have records from several eyewitnesses who heard Joseph Smith relate this story for the first time.

These witnesses are his mother, Lucy Mack Smith, his sister Katherine Smith, and his brother William Smith.

These three eyewitnesses agree that Joseph’s story was first told to them during the fall harvest season shortly before Alvin Smith died, thereby giving us a date of 1823. They are also in agreement that the story told to them was that an angel had appeared to Joseph and told him about a golden engraved record hidden in a nearby hill.

Joseph talked to his whole family about this revelation for a considerable length of time. He stated that he was required to wait for a period of four years before he was allowed to retrieve the record.

He also warned his family members that they must not tell others in the community about this ancient artifact.

None of these three eyewitnesses ever mentions that they heard any different story of origin related by Joseph Smith, and none of them ever mentions hearing, even in the community, any earlier version of this story.

Independent Witnesses to the Story

Lorenzo Saunders

It is interesting to note that one of the Smiths’ neighbors named Lorenzo Saunders stated that before Alvin Smith died in November of 1823, Joseph Smith Jr. told the Saunders family that he had seen an angel and was notified about the plates.

Joseph Smith evidently broke his own rule of non-disclosure in this instance, but in the process provided an independent set of witnesses to the elements of his story in 1823.

Harrison Chamberlain

A possible secondhand verification of this circumstance comes from Harrison Chamberlain. He claimed to have heard from people living in the vicinity of Palmyra that in the late fall of 1823, Joseph Smith told his most intimate associates about his vision of an angel and the engraved golden plates buried in a hill which contained revelation from God.

The Knight Family

We know that Joseph’s story about the Book of Mormon remained the same through the year 1826 because during that period he worked in southern New York State for the Knight family.

While he was in their employ, he said that a person had appeared to him in a vision and told him where there was an ancient gold book buried.

Martin Harris and the Golden Plates

Martin Harris is our next eyewitness for the content of Joseph Smith’s story. He said that the first time he heard about the gold Bible was around the 1st of October in the year 1827.

Harris recalled that the day following this, he went into Palmyra and spoke to some of the residents of the village about this matter. They repeated the account of it as given to them by Joseph Smith Sr., and it matched with what Joseph Jr. had said earlier.

Lucy Mack Smith arrived a little bit later at the house of Martin Harris and told him about Joseph bringing the plates to the Smith residence and many other things.

She further informed Martin that Joseph wished to see him. Martin sent his wife and daughter home with Lucy Mack Smith at this time. When they returned, they told Martin that they had both been allowed to lift a very heavy object that was said to be the golden plates.

When Martin Harris went himself to the Smith home in Manchester, New York, Joseph Jr. was away. Martin reports,

“This gave me an opportunity of talking with his wife and family about the plates.”

Harris Interviews the Smith Family

Martin indicates that he desired to get at the truth of the matter.

“I talked with them separately,” he said, “to see if their stories agreed, and I found they did agree.”

“When Joseph came home, I did not wish him to know that I had been speaking with them. So, I took him by the arm and led him away from the rest, and requested him to tell me the story, which he did as follows. He said an angel had appeared to him and told him it was God’s work.”

Joseph talked about the spectacles and said that they had the ability to display a lifelike visual image. 2 He also said the angel told him that the plates must be translated, printed, and sent before the world.

Martin relates,

“While at Mr. Smith’s, I hefted the plates and knew from the heft that they were lead or gold, and I knew that Joseph had not credit enough to buy so much lead.”

We may conclude from all of this documentary evidence that between the initial disclosure of the origin of the Book of Mormon in the fall of 1823 and Joseph bringing the plates into the Smith residence in the fall of 1827, his story did not change.

He consistently told individuals that an angel of God had informed him about a set of golden plates.

Public Speculation and Competing Narratives

Then the historical scene changes dramatically.

It is known from documentary sources that in the year 1827, Joseph Smith started making his story known among the general populace. I have collected several statements by critics — actually, there’s eleven — who say that they heard the story during this year from either Joseph Smith or one of his close associates.

There were, of course, some people who were skeptical about the young man’s claims of new revelation from the Almighty. This is the time period where the public started to speculate heavily about what they thought was really behind Joseph Smith’s story and how they imagined the book idea really originated.

Rumors and Alternative Explanations

By the summer of 1829, when the Book of Mormon was being prepared for the press, the line between history and mythology had been blurring for some time. An issue of the June 1829 Wayne Sentinel newspaper in Palmyra made note of the fact that there had already been much speculation about the Golden Bible floating around the region. 3

Steven S. Harding provides us with a unique and insightful snapshot of what was going on during this precise time period. He visited the Grandin print shop where the book was being published, and there he met Father Smith, the prophet, Oliver Cowdery, and Martin Harris in the morning.

Then in the afternoon, he had a lengthy conversation with his cousin Pomeroy Tucker and Mr. Grandin where he heard some new things about the book that was being produced.

Martin Harris About the Book of Mormon

The things that he heard from these two different groups of men is very instructive. Martin Harris informed Harding that:

  • the plates of the book were found in a hill,
  • an angel of the Lord was involved, and
  • the devil was working to thwart the project.

Tucker About the Book of Mormon

Pomeroy Tucker, on the other hand, told him something quite different. He wanted Harding to believe that Joseph Smith had a connection:

  • with the black art,
  • animal sacrifice, and
  • money digging. 4

Though in later years, Tucker admitted that these stories only qualified as rumors.

When Mr. Grandin was interviewed about the Book of Mormon just two years later than his meeting with Harding, he also seemed to be of the opinion that the golden plates were connected with money-digging lore.

John H. Gilbert, whose picture you see here on the screen, was also a workman in the Grandin print shop during the production of the Book of Mormon. He likewise held to the belief that Joseph Smith was a money digger who was involved in magic practices.

From this documentary evidence, it can be concluded that two different stories of origin were being promulgated in the Grandin building at the same time that the Book of Mormon was being issued from it.

Authentic Accounts Versus Public Speculation

The workmen of the Grandin print shop typeset and proofread the preface page of the Book of Mormon. And so they knew without any ambiguity what the authentic story of its origin was.

They were also aware from this document that there were “many false reports” circulating about the book.

Yet they chose to champion the rumors that were swirling around the region. Their repetition of idle reports, therefore, represents a deliberate revision of Joseph Smith’s own story.

On this next slide, I have highlighted the date, August 1829, so that you can see how the information that I just presented correlates with what I will talk about next.

It is at the very same time that Steven Harding was hearing an alternative storyline in Palmyra that some Latter-day Saints tried to set the record straight.

The report of story elements printed in the 11th of August 1829 issue of the Palmyra Freeman is not perfect, but it is very close to being correct in its elements. After filtering out a little of the biased opinion and incorrect notations, it says this:

“Joseph Smith of Manchester, New York, said he was visited three times by a messenger of the Almighty. Joseph was informed that a golden Bible 5 was deposited in a hill in Manchester. It was an ancient record of divine nature and origin. Joseph went to the place of deposit, dug into the earth a little ways, and found the golden Bible along with a huge pair of spectacles.

“Joseph was instructed not to let any person see the objects on penalty of death. The plates of gold measured 8 inches long and 6 inches wide and were 1/8 of an inch thick. The plates were engraved with hieroglyphics and the spectacles enabled Joseph to interpret the characters on the plates.”

The rest of the information that is on this slide shows a very interesting pattern. The first item tells us that rumors were flying through the countryside. Next, the Saints offer the authentic elements of the story to the public.

Then we find a blatant act of historical revisionism.

Abner Cole and the “Book of Pukei”

Abner Cole wanted to mock the Book of Mormon in his newspaper, The Reflector. He was most probably motivated to do this because he had violated copyright law (by the way, he was an ex-justice of the peace) by printing portions of the Book of Mormon in his paper, and the prophet forced him to stop his illegal activity.

Cole’s mockery text was called the Book of Pukei.

In this production, the editor took authentic elements of the story of the Book of Mormon’s origin and mixed them together with elements of speculation that had been floating around the community.

This is important to understand. He is using authentic elements in that Book of Pukei and he’s mixing them together with the rumors, and something’s going to happen.

Cole utilized the dialogue of one of the characters in his mockery text to call Joseph Smith an ignoramus, a criminal, and a servant of Satan.

It is in this text that Joseph Smith is connected with a man from the Great Sodus Bay called Walters the Magician, which is probably Luman Walter.

Cole claims in the Book of Pukei that the Book of Mormon really came into existence in the following manner.

Walters the Magician Narrative

  • Walters the magician was involved in witchcraft and money digging. Walters was summoned to Manchester, New York, by a group of wicked, idle, and slothful individuals, one of which was Joseph Smith.
  • Walters took the slothful individuals of Manchester out into the woods on nighttime money-digging excursions. They drew a magic circle, sacrificed a rooster, and dug into the ground on many occasions, but never actually found anything.
  • The slothful group of Manchesterites then decided that Walters was a fraud. Walters himself admitted that he was an impostor. And decided to skip town before the strong arm of the law caught up with him.

Remember that Cole is an ex-justice of the peace, and so he is talking through this document. “The strong arm of the law is going to catch up with you impostors.”

  • At this point, the mantle of Walters the Magician falls upon Joseph Smith and the rest of the Manchester rabble rallied around him.
  • And then we have the spirit of the money diggers — who is identified implicitly with Satan in the text — who appears to Joseph and reveals the golden Bible 5 idea to him.

This is what we’re hearing from Abner Cole in the Book of Pukei. If we look again at the chronological data on this slide, we can see a very informative pattern.

From Speculation to “Certainty”

A few months after Abner Cole published his book, he lamented that the published attempts to explain the origin of the Book of Mormon were thus far unsatisfactory and uncertain.

This means two very important things.

  1. Number one, Abner Cole was announcing that he rejected the authentic elements of the Book of Mormon story that had been made known in the Palmyra Freeman during the same time when the book was being published.
  2. Number two, Abner Cole was not claiming that the information put forward in his Book of Pukei was the final word in historical authenticity.

But that acknowledgement did not last long.

In the next item on the slide, we see that shortly thereafter, Cole reprinted the speculatory information on Walters the Magician, but this time he left out all of the authentic elements of the story that had been included in his previous work.

He proclaimed this time around that there was little doubt in the minds of some Palmyra residents that this version of events was the real deal.

Shortly thereafter, there was yet another transformation of the magic theory. In March of 1831, it was being proclaimed in the press that there was no doubt about Cole’s purported connection between Joseph Smith and Walters the Magician.

So, we can see that between June 1829 and March 1831, the progression among outsiders was from uncertain speculation to absolute certainty.

Eyewitnesses Contradict the Walters Narrative

There was only one thing wrong with the Walters the Magician scenario being advocated by Abner Cole. It was the exact opposite of historical reality as reported by eyewitnesses.

Eyewitness – Emer Harris

Emer Harris, the brother of Martin Harris, said that he had personal knowledge of the fact that some people in Palmyra had hired an astrologer to find the plates of the Book of Mormon.

Eyewitnesses from the Smith Family

Lucy Mack Smith recalled that a group of 10 or 12 men sent for a conjurer 6 to come and divine by magic art the place where the record was deposited.

This conjurer did in fact arrive in Palmyra and assembled with the group which had sent for him.

We know this because Father Smith, the prophet’s father, saw them himself meeting together to the east of his farm, and he overheard their plans to try and obtain the golden Bible for themselves.

The prophet’s sister Katherine remembered that when her father heard about the conjurer, an effort was made to go and warn Joseph Smith about this man and the plan that was being used against him.

Eyewitness – Joseph Knight Sr.

Joseph Knight Sr. verifies that “a great rodsman went to the Smith home in Manchester and attempted to locate the hiding place of the golden plates through the use of divining rods.” 7

Eyewitness – Brigham Young

And Brigham Young reported that this fortune teller was named Walters.

President Young related that this man angrily pointed out Joseph Smith among a crowd of people. And with considerable profanity identified Joseph as the one person who could obtain the treasure that was hidden in the hill.

But he acknowledged that he himself was not able to obtain it.

Walters the Magician was not the friend of Joseph Smith. He was his adversary.

The eyewitnesses never connect these two individuals in any type of complicity.

Critical Sources That Preserve the Original Story

Now that I have shown you that some of Joseph Smith’s critics were perfectly willing to intentionally alter his storyline, I would like to demonstrate that some of these critics have, in fact, preserved clear evidence that the prophet did not alter his storyline over time.

I have taken a careful look at the accounts of Mormonism’s detractors who claim that they heard Joseph Smith and his close associates tell the Book of Mormon story between 1827 and 1830.

Once a person understands the full Book of Mormon account that was being repeated by the early Saints, then it is not difficult to pick up the pieces of that pattern as they are scattered throughout the narratives of the critics.

Let me read to you just the pattern that is present in one single source for the year 1827. The source is Willard Chase.

The Willard Chase Account

These are the elements he says he heard from Joseph Smith Sr. and Joseph Smith Jr. in 1827.

Learning About the Plates

  • Joseph Smith Sr. said that some years prior to 1827, a spirit was sent and appeared to his son in a vision and informed him about the existence of a record on golden plates which were deposited inside of a stone box.
  • Joseph Jr. was identified as the person who must obtain the plates, and he was to do so on September 22nd.

Seeing the Plates

  • Joseph went to the place and raised up the stone box lid. There was a large pair of spectacles in with the plates.
  • Joseph removed the golden book. He was worried that someone might discover where he had gotten it. So, he laid down the plates in order to replace the top stone of the box.
  • The book vanished and reappeared inside the box.
  • Joseph attempted to get the book again, but he was struck several times.
  • A man, who was “the spirit of the prophet who wrote the book”, appeared and told Joseph that he had not been obedient.
  • Joseph was told to come to the same spot one year later and bring his older brother. By the end of the year, however, Joseph’s older brother died. Joseph went one year later and was directed by the spirit to return after another year. Joseph went to Harmony, Pennsylvania, and he eloped with Emma Hale.

September 1827

  • In the forepart of September 1827, Joseph Jr. told Willard Chase himself that he expected that he would soon take possession of the gold book, and he asked Chase to make him a chest with a lock on it, stating that he had been commanded to keep the book concealed from the eyes of all others but himself.
  • A few weeks later, Joseph told Chase that early in the morning of the 22nd of September 1827, he took the one-horse wagon of a house guest and together with his wife went to the hill that contained the book.
  • Joseph left his wife in the wagon, retrieved the book, hid it inside of a tree, and went home. He then traveled to Macedon, New York, to work.
  • After 10 days, a rumor arose that someone had gotten the book, and so Joseph’s wife went after him.
  • Joseph went to the place where he had hidden the plates, wrapped them in his frock, and headed toward his family’s home.
  • Joseph was attacked in the woods by two men. He knocked them down, arrived safely at his home, and secured his treasure.
  • Martin Harris gave Joseph Smith $50 to help him in the work of translating the book.

That’s Just One Source

This is just the information from one single 1827 critical source. I have 11 of them just for the year 1827.

And if you read the autobiography of Lucy Mack Smith, you will see that there are many matches with the information that she provides.

I wish I had adequate time to show you those, but we have got a lot more to deal with.

So, let’s move on.

Did the Book of Mormon Story Evolve?

Did the Book of Mormon story evolve? This chart here will help to demonstrate that Joseph Smith’s storyline did not evolve.

This chart here shows you that during this particular year of 1827, we have all of these reminiscences — eleven in all. What I did was I compared those particular reminiscences with JS-1832, and there’s 18 parallels.

And then I did the same exact thing with JS-1838, but there are 26 parallels at that point. So, that tells us that there is something going on as far as revision goes.

If you have a storyline, and it’s being revised over time, you would expect to see less parallels over that period of time – because it would be changing.

But we have just the opposite with this particular circumstance.

And so this is one indication that the storyline is not evolving because we have written information available to us and more matches to the verbal information is found.

Understanding the Limits of JS-1832

The final point that I would like to make in relation to the Book of Mormon storyline is that it is necessary for any person to obtain an accurate understanding of a document before they can draw legitimate conclusions from it.

The prophet’s 1832 history provides us with a prime example of the importance of this principle. This document is the earliest known cohesive account of the coming forth of the Nephite scripture produced by Joseph Smith.

Some critics may think that since it is the earliest document, then any story elements that are not found within it, but which turn up in later narrations, must represent an expansion or an evolution of the storyline.

But in this case, they would be dead wrong.

Using the Critics’ Claims Against Them

What I decided to do in this particular case was take the 1832 history and break it down into its elements. There’s approximately 90 of those elements.

The critics say that what Joseph Smith did was, he evolved his story over time. So what I wanted to do was see, first of all, how complete is that document.

I went and looked at all of the non-LDS sources that I could find to determine how many elements of the story were not in the 1832 document, but which were floating around the community.

I’ve got that paper up here, and it would take a very, very long time to read. It’s 24 pages long, but it ends up that the 1832 document is 50% incomplete.

That’s a lot of information.

And when you go through this particular paper that I’ve done, what I’ve done in addition is I’ve said, “Okay, what about those elements that are not included by Joseph Smith in the 1832 document? Are they included by him and other members of the Church in subsequent histories?”

And the answer is yes.

And so I’ve done an analysis to show that every single one of them that are not in 1832 are in histories by Latter-day Saints at later times.

JS-1832 is Not a Complete Narration

That tells us that those are integral parts of the story. But more than anything else, it tells us that the document itself, JS-1832, cannot be looked upon as being a complete narration of the story.

And so you have to consider that when you’re talking about the evolution of the storyline.

Of course, anti-Mormons want to say, “Well, we’re going to look at 1832, and anything that’s subsequent to it that we don’t see in 1832 must be a revision.”

And so, I want to point out to them that that is not the case.

In fact, we’ll be dealing with that with the First Vision. 8

Recommended Research on Moroni and Revision Claims

But before we do, I would like to point out that there’s two articles that I think are quite excellent that deal with the idea of Joseph Smith’s supposed revision with the Book of Mormon story.

And that is one by Larry Morris — that’s in the FARMS Review — and one by Mark Ashurst-McGee that’s in Mormon Historical Studies.

And what they do is deal with the Moroni story. I think that they are well worth looking into for anybody who’s interested.

Introducing the First Vision Discussion

So, let’s move on now to some information about the First Vision.

What you see on the screen, this is JS-1832. That is Joseph Smith’s first time (that we know of) that he has told the First Vision story in a formal manner.

And it is the only one where he has written it himself.

So what you’re seeing here on screen is Joseph Smith’s handwriting. And if you look at the very bottom there, it ends with the words of Christ talking to him during the First Vision.

JS-1832, as stated before, is only about 50% complete when it comes to the information that has to do with the Book of Mormon. Well, that has some implication for the First Vision material itself.

I have done a preliminary analysis.

In fact, I can just show you one slide here. There’s a preliminary analysis. I just scanned over some documents to find that there are indeed pieces of the First Vision story that are not included in JS-1832 that were known among the non-LDS community beforehand and which show up in JS-1838.

And so they are integral parts of the story.

But it tells us — just these three little items — they tell us that the information on the First Vision in JS-1832 is not complete. But we’re going to get into much more of that.

Let’s go here to this next slide.

Why Joseph Smith Wrote the First Vision Himself

I want you to see this pattern. The red text represents Joseph Smith’s own handwriting.

First of all, at the top we have the scribe Frederick G. Williams. He barely wrote down a paragraph worth of material before he was replaced by the prophet.

This is a very curious fact, especially because right after Joseph Smith finished with the First Vision material, Brother Williams took over again.

This pattern seems to be an indication that the prophet wanted to write down the First Vision story himself.

And so the next question becomes why?

A possible answer to this question presents itself when one considers what happened to Joseph Smith when he tried to share the First Vision story for the first time on an informal verbal basis.

We read in the 1838 history of the Church that when the prophet first started telling others about his theophany, he ran into an immediate snag, and it was a particularly perplexing one.

His story was not only treated with great contempt, but Joseph was told that the experience was all of the devil.

Biblical Frameworks in JS-1832

I believe that Joseph Smith was trying in his initial written account of the First Vision to find a way to counteract these very negative reactions.

And here’s my evidence.

This slide shows that the JS-1832 First Vision recital is built over a continuous framework of biblical passages — roughly 47 in all. They span the entire Bible from Genesis to Revelation.

It appears that Joseph Smith was attempting to bolster the chances of his story being accepted by the world by couching it in language that would resonate in a positive manner with the masses.

Joseph Drew Specific Parallels to Help Listeners Understand

But look more closely at this slide. In the area where the actual theophany takes place, which is between the brackets, you will notice that Joseph Smith has incorporated three very relevant Bible stories into the telling of his tale.

Three stories that have to do with the appearance of heavenly beings.

  1. The first is the story of the angels who visited the shepherds amidst a heavenly light and announced the coming of the Christ.
  2. The second has to do with the appearance of the Savior to the apostle Paul when the light shone around him.
  3. And the third is about the apostle Stephen seeing both the Father and the Son.

Comparing Joseph Smith to Paul

But before we move on to the next slide, I will remind you what the prophet said about the rejection he experienced when he first announced his vision.

He said, “I felt like the apostle Paul because they wouldn’t believe my vision either.”

And so when Joseph Smith incorporates Acts 26 into his framework, the parallels are so exacting that when Paul speaks in his text in Acts 26, Joseph speaks in his text.

When Jesus addresses Paul in the Bible passage, Jesus addresses Joseph in JS-1832, and then it switches back again.

It is a very, very exacting set of parallels.

Psalm 31 and the Personal Nature of the Account

But this is what really caught my attention.

This is Psalm 31. On the left-hand side is the text of JS-1832.

It appears that Joseph Smith utilized a large-scale framework of Psalm 31. The parallels in here are very exacting.

I’ve also been able to see in this that there are some elements of Psalm 31 that he incorporated into JS-1838.

Psalm 31 as a Vehicle for Joseph to Tell His Story

Psalm 31 is a deeply personal psalm. If you read it, you can see that there is a lot of heartfelt dialogue going on.

That is something that people have noticed about JS-1832. Joseph Smith’s 1832 account of the First Vision is very personal.

But this next slide shows us that there’s much, much, much more to this particular document.

This is a document that’s created by Joseph Smith when he is 26 years old.

If you look at the top of the page, you will see a set of props and a set of themes. The dividing line that goes through that slide shows you the place where he stops and prays.

All of the parallels underneath are an exact match.

Joseph Smith has constructed this document very, very, very carefully. This is not a retelling of a story. This is a very complex document.

I don’t think I have seen it all yet. These are things I have seen in the last two weeks. I have seen a few more things since. I am coming to the conclusion that this document needs to be studied a lot more. A lot more.

The reason why it didn’t become published is very interesting to me. In fact, the whole nature of the document — I have a theory which I will work on. But this document is so extremely interesting because it’s so complex. Joseph Smith is trying to do something very deliberate, and I think that it calls for much further study.

Opposites and Contrasts in the Narrative

Here is another set of parallels. These are opposites.

In this particular set, we learn what happens to Joseph Smith before and after. I’ll just read off what it says.

  • The world’s in darkness, and then Joseph is surrounded by light.
  • Joseph’s mind was exceedingly distressed, but afterwards he’s filled with love.
  • Some people said there was no God, and Joseph saw Him.
  • When Joseph saw the Lord Himself, mankind was not coming to the Lord, but the Lord was with Joseph afterward.
  • Joseph felt grief before, but he felt joy after.
  • Joseph had belief before, but afterward he could find none who would believe.

As you can tell by now, this is an intricate text, and again, I would say that it calls for further study.

The Presence of God the Father in JS-1832

This brings us to the most frequent anti-Mormon criticism about JS-1832. That God the Father is obviously not mentioned as making an appearance to Joseph Smith in this First Vision account.

I would like to suggest, however, that all this time we as Latter-day Saints have not recognized that God the Father’s appearance is in fact referred to right in this document.

But all this time, we’ve been looking in the wrong place.

In the introductory remarks of JS-1832, Joseph Smith outlined precisely how he was about to proceed in the narration of his history.

The Testimony From on High

He mentioned that in the very first incident associated with his marvelous experience in the Restoration, he received “the testimony from on high”.

Because of the formatting of the introductory paragraph and the structure of the text which follows it, it can be concluded with a marked degree of certainty that this testimony was connected with the First Vision.

The question to ask then is what was “the testimony from on high”? Joseph Smith answers this question in another one of his recitals, which is November of 1835. There he states that one of the two personages who appeared to him testified that Jesus Christ was the Son of God.

In JS-1838 (which is the First Vision narrative now published in the Pearl of Great Price) 9 we learn that one of the personages testified to Joseph Smith using the following words: “This is my beloved Son.”

We may comfortably conclude from this documentary evidence that the testimony from on high of JS-1832 is equivalent to the phrase spoken by God the Father in JS-1838.

Therefore, we may safely say that when Joseph Smith wrote the 1832 account of the First Vision, the appearance of God the Father was definitely in his mind because he obliquely refers to it.

It seems that he did not make an explicit mention of this part of the story simply because of what I have shown you before.

He had chosen to use the Apostle Paul’s experience as the main framework for that portion of his narrative – and Paul only saw Jesus Christ.

Responding to Revisionism Claims

I would now like to offer some brief insights on a few other anti-Mormon arguments that are commonly used against the First Vision, specifically those that are connected with accusations of revisionism. 1

The first anti-Mormon claim that I would like to draw your attention to is what I call a “real whopper”.

Revisionism Claim: Joseph Joined a Church After 1820

It says that Joseph Smith joined not just one church after God supposedly commanded him not to in 1820. (Thus demonstrating that his meeting with the Lord never really happened.) But he joined three different churches before he formally organized the LDS faith in 1830.

The basic problem with this particular argument is that there have been no authentic documents ever produced confirming that Joseph Smith actually became an acknowledged member of either the Baptist, the Methodist, or the Presbyterian denominations.

Every one of the claims of joining other faiths is made extremely late in the historical record.

But I have gathered together a few very early documents that say just the opposite. I’ll just read through a few of them briefly.

Here it is.

  • In November 1830, four LDS men from New York teach that at the time the angel appeared to Joseph Smith (September 1823). He made no pretensions to religion of any kind.
  • 1831 — this is February — the editor of the Palmyra newspaper claims that he had been credibly informed and is quite certain that the prophet never made any serious pretensions to religion until the Book of Mormon.
  • 1832, March. A couple of young Mormon men teach the citizens in the courthouse:

“Joseph Smith, who was then an inhabitant of the state of New York, town of Manchester, having repented of his sins, but not attached himself to any party of Christians owing to the numerous divisions among them, and being in doubt what his duty was, he had recourse to prayer.”

(By the way, that particular document has First Vision elements in it before JS-1832 is created. And I don’t have time to deal with that, but I want to make you aware of it.)

Revisionism Through Memory and Retelling

That happens to be a really good example of somebody who has gone ahead and revised. They have taken elements of the First Vision story and elements of the coming forth of the Book of Mormon story.

In that particular article, they melded them together, and they admitted how it happened too.

They said that they were talking from memory and they weren’t quite sure.

And so when you’re dealing with the accusations of revisionism, you want to be very careful about understanding the documents that people are using to claim revisionism. 1

The ‘Angel’ Argument

Here is another one of the little irksome arguments that the prophet is having used against his First Vision story.

The argument goes that Joseph Smith initially said that his First Vision visitants were angels, and they use this particular document as the evidence.

Here you’ve got the diary, 14th of November 1835. It says,

“The time I received the first visitation of angels, which was when I was about 14 years old.”

And people say, “Well look, he’s saying that his visitation was of angels when he was 14 years old,” and they try to use that against Joseph Smith.

But only five days previous in his same diary — if people would just read the book — they would see that Joseph Smith is giving us a really interesting insight into his First Vision experience.

He says,

“When I was about 14 years old, I had a visitation of two personages and I saw many angels.”

So when Joseph Smith says on the 14th of November, “My first visitation of angels was when I was 14 years old,” he’s not kidding.

He saw many angels the first time in the Sacred Grove. Moroni is not the first angel that Joseph Smith sees.

Early References to the First Vision

The next argument that I would like to deal with briefly has to do with the idea that Joseph Smith was making up the First Vision story throughout the 1830s, and that’s why nobody hears about it in public either among members of the Church or among the general populace.

This particular slide argues pretty persuasively otherwise.

In fact, if you look at the far left-hand side of the slide, you’ll see that in approximately 1829, or somewhere before December of 1829, we have a possible statement by somebody whose name is Green.

And what he says is that Joseph Smith was preaching in Victor, New York, that he had been met by God. And in fact, the title that this person uses is “the Almighty.”

What he does is he is met by God and his experience is like what happened to Paul on the road to Damascus.

So there we have a connection with — this is a vision of theophany — but most important, look there at the bottom. It says that he was converted to true doctrine.

So this is an idea that’s floating around in 1829.

Now, I’ve got another instance that I am leaning heavily towards that has to do with 1829 and Joseph Smith talking about the First Vision, but I haven’t quite developed that enough to my satisfaction.

So, I’ll leave that out for now.

Edward Stevenson & Joseph Curtis

But you can see that all the way through that particular time period — this is all just 1830s — people who are anti-Mormons like to pick on Edward Stevenson.

They say, “Oh well, Edward Stevenson’s memory — oh, his reminiscence is so far gone in the very last part of the 19th century. So he’s probably just misremembering.”

I saw that in a book just published recently by somebody who has been to this conference.

But you have a second witness, and that is Joseph Curtis. He was there too.

But other than that, we have all these other people who are hearing the First Vision story being related. And these are people who are not members of the Church as well as members of the Church.

And I’ll be giving a little appeal for this information at the end of my talk. Let’s go to the next slide.

Oliver Cowdery and the “Missing” First Vision

This other claim is quite fascinating. It also has to do with a little bit of what we talked about before.

In the 1830s — we’re talking about 1834, 35, and 36 — Oliver Cowdery prints the history of the Church for the first time. That particular document has got a gaping hole in it. He does not talk about the First Vision. At least that’s what some anti-Mormons want you to believe.

But if you look at the document very carefully, you can see what Oliver Cowdery does.

He starts talking about the First Vision narrative. He starts talking about the revivals, and then something happens. This is what I want to point out with this slide.

The Redirection Theory

I’ll just summarize what’s on the slide.

Richard L. Anderson also noted this Theory

In fact, I have to mention this because Dr. Anderson told me not to. I had done an independent analysis myself, and I had come to the conclusion that Oliver Cowdery was using JS-1832 to create his history of the Church in 1834.

And I was so excited about this. I had written it up in detail. I went to Dr. Richard Anderson’s office and said, “Look at this. This is so interesting.”

“Oh yeah. I knew that back in 1969.”

And he actually did publish a few sentences on the idea that if you would look at the two, you would find a connection. But he didn’t write it up in detail.

And so I’m going to publish it in detail because I think it’s so important.

Oliver Cowdery had Source Documents

The point is that Oliver Cowdery did know the First Vision story because he says, “I was not only having the prophet as an assistant in creating my history, but I also had authentic documents at my disposal.”

In fact, he says, “They’re in my possession.”

And so the “authentic documents” that he is talking about is most probably JS-1832. When you see the parallels, they’re unmistakable.

So Oliver Cowdery knows about the First Vision. He does not include it in OCJS-1834. And I think that this is the reason why. I’ll call it the redirection theory.

What happens is he starts into the First Vision narrative. It’s very clear parallels to what Joseph Smith says later. And then he receives a letter from William W. Phelps.

William W. Phelps says, “I want to hear about the Book of Mormon story.” And he specifically mentions the year 1823.

And then lo and behold, in the next piece of the church history that’s printed, Oliver Cowdery says, “I got your letter. I don’t want to talk about the revival anymore. I’m going to change the date to 1823.”

And then he tells the Book of Mormon story. I think that that is something that should also be looked into.

Joseph Smith and the Revivals

The next thing that I would like to talk about is Joseph Smith and the revivals. This is a big thing with anti-Mormons.

I would like to point out — and several people have done this before — but I would like to go into a little bit more detail about the spatial terms in JS-1838.

Joseph Smith says the revival activity, as far as I interpret the document, is happening in three different zones.

And that is: the place where we lived, so the general vicinity of Palmyra; that region of country; and the whole district of country.

I interpret that as three different places, and I’ll show you why I think that way.

Revival Activity in Joseph Smith’s Region

Here on this next slide, we have a whole lot of confirmed revival activity going around Joseph Smith’s area in 1819 and 1820.

An awful lot of it.

In fact, if you look down there on the bottom right-hand corner of this slide, you’ll see that it says that there are several hundred people being converted in that particular region.

This is the Finger Lakes region. And I would say that you could safely compare that to Joseph’s “region of country.”

It’s nearby. This is not a lot of space.

I think that the farthest I decided to go on this was approximately 60 miles out. In fact, Rochester is approximately 24 miles. Out there at Marcellus, it’s getting around the 60-mile range.

I didn’t include Ithaca because it ran out on the bottom of the slide.

And I’m not done yet. I’ve got a whole bunch of other revivals that I have collected that I haven’t put on there because I have not yet looked at the documents myself and confirmed them in my own mind.

But safely, as preliminary information, this is revival activity going around the Smith cabin around this general time period.

Newspaper Reports and the Third Zone

There are some other things about revivals that I want to point out, and I think that this is something that’s connected with Joseph Smith’s narrative in JS-1838.

We know that Joseph Smith is reading the newspaper. He’s picking it up. In fact, I’m pretty sure he’s reading it, but he’s picking it up every single week. At least we’ve got a non-LDS eyewitness saying so.

This particular newspaper has a whole bunch of information in it during the year 1820 about revivals.

Look at where it starts. It starts in June on the left-hand side. So, we’re starting around the summertime.

But going to the end of the year, Joseph Smith’s newspaper is telling him about five straight months worth of revival information.

All three denominations mentioned by Joseph Smith in JS-1838 are being represented, and great multitudes are being converted.

This is occurring in the third zone.

So that slide that I showed you before had to do with zone number two. Zone number three has got a whole lot more conversion activity going on.

And so I would think that it would be a wise thing to consider that when Joseph Smith is talking in JS-1838 about all this revival and conversion activity, that some of it’s possibly coming from his newspaper.

It doesn’t necessarily say that he is an eyewitness to all of the activity that he is describing. And so that’s something that we should look into.

Lucy Mack Smith and Revival Activity

The last one that I’d like to talk about today has to do with another argument that is used a lot by anti-Mormons that has to do with revival activity.

Again, they try to use Lucy Mack Smith’s autobiography against him by saying,

“Look, Lucy Mack Smith says in her own autobiography that after Alvin Smith dies, there is a revival of religion in the area.”

I want you to see the comparisons on this chart very carefully. On the left-hand side, you’ll see that this is the crossed-out portion of the autobiography. But look at the match. What does that tell you about this revival activity? On the left-hand side, it says that there is a direct connection between the revival of religion in that neighborhood and Alvin Smith’s death.

And there’s a whole big block of text that is marked out in that document.

So, she says that:

We had all this grief in our hearts. We went to this revival so that we could have relief for our overcharged grief or our overcharged feelings. We could not be comforted.

We went there to this revival to be comforted.

The point I want to make is that there is a definite connection in this text. I think it should be explored. I think that we should consider what it is exactly that Lucy Mack Smith is saying because this other information should cause us to say, “Wait a minute.”

Lucy Mack Smith and Church Affiliation

And that is this. What anti-Mormons want you to think is that Lucy Mack Smith said that she joined a church during this so-called revival period. And I say, where does it say that? And when did it occur?

We know from historical documents — this is verified — there is a Palmyra revival going on in 1823 and 1824. But I want to point out to you when it occurs. In fact, if you want to get into this really good, go get what George Lane said about this revival activity in Palmyra. When does he say it really got going?

It’s not in the spring of 1824. It’s December. So Lucy Mack Smith is possibly talking about something that is separate by a large amount of time.

Next question you should ask yourself is here we’ve got Lucy Mack Smith talking about this group that gets together. Well, what is this group that’s getting together in her autobiography? What was the point of the group? It was that they wanted to bring all denominations together.

Well, who was in charge of this group? One guy. And he’s not identified, and his affiliation with a religion is not identified.

And here is the other thing that you have to consider, and that is that in Lucy Mack Smith’s autobiography, she says herself that she was a baptized person, but she did not formally join herself to any denomination until when? She says right in her autobiography it was when her son Alvin attained his 22nd year. And guess when that was? 11th of February 1820.

So here we have some clues to look at.

Questions About the Timing of Revival Activity

In fact, I’m working on some of this material right now.

If we take that literally — February of 1820 — and we’re talking about revivals. There’s a paper that’s floating around the community right now that has to do with revivals. They’re trying to push the date towards summer of 1820.

But you’ve got Lucy Mack Smith with an indication that she possibly joined the church of her choice in February of 1820. Another question arises from that. And that is, “well, when in the world is the revival activity occurring that Joseph Smith is talking about in JS-1838?”

A clue seems to come from William Smith. He talks about the fact that in that particular time period the revival activity was taking place in schoolhouses and private dwellings. And my first question was why? Why isn’t it out in the woods at the Methodist campground?

The possibility is that we are talking about cold weather revivals. In fact, in this paper that’s floating around right now, it is acknowledged that revivals are going on during the wintertime, during the cold months. In fact, I have two instances that I know of where there are verified revivals going on in Palmyra in wintertime.

So, it’s a definite possibility. I am starting to wonder when exactly is the revival activity that Joseph Smith is talking about in JS-1838, even though he went into the woods in the spring of 1820.

Dating the First Vision

And I’ve got to tell you this before I stop.  Because this is my goal marker boundaries:

  • I’m trying to stick with revival activity at the beginning of 1820 because of reasons from the text.

But my outside boundary is different than another paper that’s floating around. Because I’m talking about what Orson Pratt said.

  • Orson Pratt had access to Joseph Smith.
  • Orson Pratt was the first person to publish the First Vision story.
  • Orson Pratt said that the First Vision took place when Joseph Smith was 14 years and 4 months old. About that time.

That gives us a date of approximately 23rd of April 1820. So, we don’t know.

I do know that the revival activity described by Joseph Smith takes a period of time. We don’t know how much time he spent considering things. But we do know that before that midpoint. Mid-spring is 5th of May 1820.  Orson Pratt points us towards around 23rd of April.

So those are the goalposts. I hope that particular piece of information could be explored also further.

There’s a lot that we still don’t know about the First Vision. In fact, I have 65 computer files on my computer right now of material. I have just been looking at it in my spare time. And seeing that there’s a lot more to this story that could and should be explored.

Final Appeal and Invitation to Study

But before I stop, I would like to make an appeal and an announcement.

An Appeal

If there is anybody who ever sees anywhere:

  • in family histories,
  • in journals,
  • in diaries

that:

  1. talk about Joseph Smith reciting the First Vision
  2. especially if it’s during his lifetime

I would like to hear from you. Please contact me at my publisher. 10 I want to fill in the gaps.

An Announcement

I have created a 70-page timeline. It has to do with First Vision recitals from the beginning all the way up through canonization. 11 But it’s that particular early time period that I’m interested in.

There’s a man sitting right in front of me. He pointed out a tiny little piece of information that is brand new to me. He showed me that Joseph Smith is reciting the First Vision story. In Nauvoo during times that we don’t expect. And so I’m very interested in gathering more material. If you ever hear or see those things, let me know.

The final thing I’d like to say is that:

  • If you want to learn more about the First Vision, I would encourage you to read.
  • If you want to learn more about the coming forth of the Book of Mormon. I would encourage you to read.

On this website here, josephsmithstudies.com, I have provided bibliographies. (No commentary, because I’m sure you couldn’t care less what I think.) I have pointed out and connected a whole lot of material. They are

  • linked articles
  • that will take you straight to material that you can read. 12

An Invitation to Study

I would encourage you to continue to study the Restoration in detail. And I thank you for your time today.

Search topics

Joseph Smith First Vision; multiple First Vision accounts; JS-1832; JS-1838; Book of Mormon origins; Martin Harris; Lucy Mack Smith; Oliver Cowdery; Moroni appearances; Palmyra revival; revival activity in 1820; religious excitement in western New York; restoration narratives; eyewitness accounts.

Anti-Mormon revisionism claims; historical revisionism; documentary evidence; Orson Pratt First Vision; William Smith revival accounts; Acts 26 parallels; Psalm 31 in JS-1832; theophany; seer stones; interpreters; golden plates; translation of the Book of Mormon; Grandin print shop; Willard Chase; early Restoration history; historical memory; Palmyra newspapers; folk magic in early America.

CES Letter; Mormon Church history; Mormon Church criticism; Mormon apologetics; Mormonism and folk magic; Mormon money digging; LDS First Vision; Book of Mormon criticism; Mormon origins; Mormon historical controversy; Mormon restoration claims; Mormon scripture origins.

LDS Church history evidence; Joseph Smith criticism; anti-Mormon claims; Mormon truth claims; Mormon historical documents; Mormon eyewitnesses; LDS apologetics; Mormon religious experience.

Joseph Smith: The Profile of a Prophet

July 15, 2011 by Stephen Smoot

The following PDF attachment is an exploration into Joseph Smith meeting the criteria of an authentic prophet. It was originally part of my review of Joel Kramer’s anti-Mormon DVD The Bible vs. Joseph Smith. Upon the wise suggestion of Greg Smith, a fellow FAIR volunteer, I excised this portion of my review and rewrote parts of it to stand alone as a separate article. As you may discover upon reading, this article does have a sort of devotional flavor to it. But I hope that the main point behind this article is easily recognizable.

With that in mind, I offer for the reader’s consideration Joseph Smith: The Profile of a Prophet for those interested. Feel free to download and keep a copy if you wish.

Joseph Smith: The Profile of a Prophet

Filed Under: Apologetics, LDS History Tagged With: Hugh B. Brown, Joseph Smith, prophet

A Note on the First Visions of Paul and Joseph Smith

July 11, 2011 by Stephen Smoot

Luke reports three accounts of Paul’s conversion on the road to Damascus in the book of Acts. The first is in Acts 9:1-9. The second appears in Acts 22:6-11. And the third is recorded in Acts 26:12-20. Below are these three accounts reprinted as they appear in the King James Version:

Acts 9:1-9

1And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest,

2And desired of him letters to Damascus to the synagogues, that if he found any of this way, whether they were men or women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem.

3And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven:

4And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?

5And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.

6And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do.

7And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.

8And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus.

9And he was three days without sight, and neither did eat nor drink.

Acts 22:6-11

6And it came to pass, that, as I made my journey, and was come nigh unto Damascus about noon, suddenly there shone from heaven a great light round about me.

7And I fell unto the ground, and heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?

8And I answered, Who art thou, Lord? And he said unto me, I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest.

9And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me.

10And I said, What shall I do, Lord? And the Lord said unto me, Arise, and go into Damascus; and there it shall be told thee of all things which are appointed for thee to do.

11And when I could not see for the glory of that light, being led by the hand of them that were with me, I came into Damascus.

Acts 26:12-20

12Whereupon as I went to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief priests,

13At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with me.

14And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.

15And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest.

16But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee;

17Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,

18To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.

19Whereupon, O king Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision:

20But shewed first unto them of Damascus, and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the coasts of Judæa, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance.

Notice how Luke attributes additional words to the Lord Jesus to Paul in his third account than in his first two. In the first account, Jesus tells Paul to “arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do” (Acts 9:6). In the second report, Luke describes Jesus telling Paul to “arise, and go into Damascus; and there it shall be told thee of all things which are appointed for thee to do” (Acts 22:10). But notice in the third account how Luke quotes Jesus as saying much more to Paul than in the previous two accounts:

And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest. But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I  have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee; Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of  Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me (Acts 26:15-18).

This added information in the third report from Luke is understandable, considering the context. In Acts 26 Paul is relating to Agrippa the reason behind his imprisonment and the ruckus he had created with the Jews at the Temple. Luke reports that Paul got into hot water with his pious Jewish peers for not only preaching against the Law of Moses but also for allegedly bringing “Greeks also into the temple, and pollut[ing] this holy place” (Acts 21:28). So grievous was Paul’s perceived profaning of the temple that his zealous would-be executioners immediately took him outside the precincts of the temple to summarily dispatch him (Acts 21:30-31). Fortunately for Paul the clatter alerted the Roman authorities, who took him into their custody before he could be killed (Acts 21:32-40).

As such, Paul had a lot of explaining to do on his part. Why was he so hated amongst his Jewish peers to the point of blood lust? Furthermore, as a Jew what business did he have associating with Gentiles? Paul gives Agrippa the answer, as reported by Luke: Jesus had specifically charged Paul to witness unto the Gentiles, and to win them over from their Satanic paganism to forgiveness and sanctification through Christ. Hence, we can infer, Paul gave this additional detail to Agrippa because of its expediency and relevance to his defense before the Gentile king. It certainly would have done Paul no good to relate this revolutionary (not to mention blasphemous) information to his Jewish enemies in Acts 22. As a matter of fact, these same Jewish foes patiently listened to Paul’s story until he described a hitherto unrecorded vision in the Jerusalem temple wherein he was commissioned by the Lord to depart unto the Gentiles. Upon hearing this unbearably shocking detail they cut him off and were driven to madness as they demanded his life (Acts 22:17-22). Furthermore, Luke had no need to provide this information in Acts 9 since he has yet to detail the ministry of the Apostles to the Gentiles beginning in Acts 10. It would throw off the development of the narrative history for Luke to provide a full account of the Lord’s words to Paul before the reader even knows what is going on with the Gentiles in the first place. But, once Luke has firmly established Paul’s role as the apostle to the Gentiles, and given the immediate context of Paul’s account to Agrippa, it makes perfect sense why he would omit this information until the third account in Acts 26.

What does all this have to do with Joseph Smith’s own theophany in 1820? Critics of Joseph Smith are eager to point out that his first recorded account of his vision written in 1832 is not as detailed as his accounts written in subsequent years, especially his 1838 account that was later canonized in the Pearl of Great Price. Surely, these critics contend, Joseph Smith was evolving his story over time to suit his purposes. His story becomes grander and more spectacular with each telling, in what can only be Joseph’s desperate attempt to bolster his prophetic legitimacy in the face of widespread apostasy and doubt within the Church.

However, this argument is unwarranted, and is especially dangerous for sectarian critics of Joseph Smith. I shall allow the esteemed Professor Richard L. Anderson to explain, since he has done a better job in succinctly demonstrating the sectarians’ dilemma than I could ever hope to:

Critics love to dwell on supposed inconsistencies in Joseph Smith’s spontaneous accounts of his first vision. But people normally give shorter and longer accounts of a vivid experience that is retold more than once. Joseph Smith was cautious about public explanations of his sacred experiences until the Church grew strong and could properly publicize what God had given him. Thus his most detailed first-vision account came after several others–at the time that he began his formal history that he saw as one of the key responsibilities of his life (see JS-H 1:1 2, 17 20). In Paul’s case there is the parallel. His most detailed account of Christ’s call is the last recorded mention of several. Thus before Agrippa, Paul related how the glorified Savior first prophesied his work among the gentiles; this was told only then because Paul was speaking before a gentile audience (see Acts 26:16 – 18). Paul and Joseph Smith had reasons for delaying full details of their visions until the proper time and place.[1]

Thus, for me at least, when faced with anti-Mormon allegations against the authenticity of Joseph Smith’s First Vision, the phrase “he who lives in a glass house shouldn’t throw stones” comes to mind.

Notes:

[1]: Richard L. Anderson, Parallel Prophets: Paul and Joseph Smith.

Filed Under: Apologetics, Joseph Smith, LDS History Tagged With: First Vision, Joseph Smith, New Testament, Paul

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3

Primary Sidebar

Faithful Study Resources for Come, Follow Me

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address:

Subscribe to Podcast

Podcast icon
Subscribe to podcast in iTunes
Subscribe to podcast elsewhere
Listen with FAIR app
Android app on Google Play Download on the App Store

Pages

  • Blog Guidelines

FAIR Latest

  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR – 2 Samuel 11–12; 1 Kings 3; 6–9; 11 – Part 2 – Autumn Dickson
  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR – 2 Samuel 11–12; 1 Kings 3; 6–9; 11 – Jennifer Roach Lees
  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR – 2 Samuel 11–12; 1 Kings 3; 6–9; 11 – Part 1 – Autumn Dickson
  • No One Walks Alone 
  • Come, Follow Me with FAIR – 1 Samuel 17–18; 24–26; 2 Samuel 5–7 – Part 2 – Autumn Dickson

Blog Categories

Recent Comments

  • Jack Quain on Come, Follow Me with FAIR – 2 Samuel 11–12; 1 Kings 3; 6–9; 11 – Part 2 – Autumn Dickson
  • Trevor Holyoak on Tithing—Putting God First 
  • Marisol on Tithing—Putting God First 
  • Kaylyn Dastrup on Come, Follow Me with FAIR – 1 Samuel 8–10; 13; 15–16 – Part 1 – Autumn Dickson
  • Guerry Green on Come, Follow Me with FAIR – Exodus 7–13 – Part 1 – Autumn Dickson

Archives

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • iTunes
  • YouTube
Android app on Google Play Download on the App Store

Footer

FairMormon Logo

FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Donate to FAIR

We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.

Donate Now

Site Footer